Tom returns to his hometown on the tenth anniversary of the Valentine's night massacre that claimed the lives of 22 people. Instead of a homecoming, Tom finds himself suspected of committing the murders, and it seems like his old flame is the only one that believes he's innocent.
A psychotic serial slasher starts a bloodthirsty murder rampage at Cherry Falls high school that only kills the local high school virgins. This leads to the local teenage population organising a sex party in order to lose their virginity and thus no longer be targets...Written by
L.H. Wong <firstname.lastname@example.org>
When the murderer is hacking down the front door with an ax, the door and its hinges change. In one shot the hinges are on the left (front view) and the door closes. The murderer then manages to hack through the door and the door swings open with hinges on both sides, opening like a swinging door from a western movie. See more »
She thinks fellatio is a character in Shakespeare.
See more »
The closing credits roll down instead of up. See more »
The movie had to be re-cut five times in order to achieve an R-rating. Most significant cuts include:
graphic sexual activity during the climactic orgy sequence;
The death of a character named Annette The originally scripted scene showed her having her throat slowly pushed onto a pane of glass. The scene was filmed and very brutal, done all in one graphic cut. However, she shot was later replaced with her character's head split open in the front door. That scene was still trimmed heavily. In unrated versions the top of her head erupts and a splash of blood flies across the doorjamb.
Rod's death had more blood.
Timmy's death was an on screen kill that featured gruesome spurting blood.
A character's death at the climatic orgy was nixed for time and MPAA constraints. A male character's throat was slashed open.
There must be something about the way they executed this stupid and so-tired plot - nut case stalks high school virgins, sparking consideration of "protective measures" - because there was no other reason for me to periodically check in on this trash. I don't know, maybe there's a certain quiet campiness to the acting. Otherwise, from the tacky title to the plot and dialogue to the actual (in)action there's really nothing here.
17 of 35 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this