CIA analyst Jack Ryan must stop the plans of a Neo Nazis faction that threatens to induce a catastrophic conflict between the United States and Russia's newly elected president by detonating a nuclear weapon at a football game in Baltimore.
Communist Radicals hijack Air Force One with The U.S. President and his family on board. The Vice President negotiates from Washington D.C., while the President, a Veteran, fights to rescue the hostages on board.
When the president of Russia suddenly dies, a man whose politics are virtually unknown succeeds him. The change in political leaders sparks paranoia among American CIA officials, so CIA director Bill Cabot recruits a young analyst to supply insight and advice on the situation. Then the unthinkable happens: a nuclear bomb explodes in a U.S. city, and America is quick to blame the Russians.Written by
Sujit R. Varma
The shot of the crippled aircraft carrier, was originally intended to be an establishing shot before the attack. This explains why there is no crew visible, despite the fact that crew and pilots were seen racing for the fighters a few moments before. See more »
When the "Baltimore Forum" is shown in initial aerial shot, it is located on O'Donnell Street (just off I-95), therefore the Presidential motor adding is traveling in the correct direction to that location. Also, it is shown as a domed stadium, thus the lighting of the footage of the game is appropriate. The aerial shot of Baltimore shows M&T Bank Stadium (as well as Oriole Park at Camden a Yards), technically not the same stadium as where the game is being played as established by the earlier shot of the "Baltimore Forum". See more »
In 1973, Egypt and Syria launched a surprise attack against Israel. By Day Two, Israeli ground forces appeared on the verge of defeat. In the event that their ground forces were overrun, an Israeli A-4 jet took off on patrol with one nuclear bomb.
See more »
Very entertaining. Why do reviewers always have to compare to the book?
As usual, I am very glad I saw the movie BEFORE I read the reviews on this site. Why do soooo many reviewers here have to compare the movie to the book? A book allows 300-400 pages (or more) to develop plots and characters. We are reviewing movies on IMDb, not books. I guess reviewers here want to appear erudite by scraping up details from the book that get omitted or distorted on the screen. I am a very active reader, but I simply cannot read every book that makes it to the movie theatres. Writing a book (a fairly isolated event) is a significantly different event than producing a movie which involves countless people and issues: screenwriters, actors, writers, directors, production people, locations, etc., etc. Making all these book to movie comparisons isn't fair to the movie or the book. Many times I just want to watch a movie and judge it on its merits alone - as a movie, period. I did not read this book, but I watched the movie and found it very entertaining and extremely absorbing.
36 of 48 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this