After ten years of doing nothing, Orel and Gringe are in their mid 30s and they struggle to finish their first rap album. Their texts are mostly sex jokes and booze stories and reflect the ... See full summary »
In the Kingdom of Bubunne, women are in power while men wear veils and do domestic tasks. Jacky, a lovely young man who dreams of marrying the 'Colonelle' has to struggle like a Cinderella to realize his dreams.
In this off beat account of King Arthur's quest for the Grail, virtually every journey, battle or adventure is stopped dead in its tracks by the knights of the round table's most worldly ... See full summary »
A young woman arrives in Paris where she finds a job as a waitress in bar next on Avenue Montaigne that caters to the surrounding theaters and the wealthy inhabitants of the area. She will meet a pianist, a famous actress and a great art collector, and become acquainted with the "luxurious" world her grandmother has told her about since her childhood.
Cécile de France,
Parisian friends (two brothers and their one-time girl friends) fly to Corsica for a mountain trek guided by the married lover of one of the women. Cora, nearly 30, goes because her psychic... See full summary »
El Paris, a town located somewhere uncertain, but in our time. Quasimodo is hunchbacked, bald, deaf. He takes size 47 in shoes and is contented. However, 20 years ago, his destiny was stolen from him: his parents, finding him too ugly, entrusted him to the fundamentalist arch-deacon of the town, Frollo and had him replaced by a Cuban girl, Esméralda. Now terror reigns in El Paris: a serial killer is lurking, 18 women have been killed. The head of police, Phoebus, erotomaniac and incompetent, leads the investigation in his beautiful, shiny 4-wheel drive. Quasimodo is the prime suspect, although he is innocent. Frollo has only one aim: to find out the truth (or is he?). Esméralda has only one aim: to compensate Quasimodo. Quasimodo has only one aim: to ring the bells on time. Phoebus has only one aim: to polish his car.Written by
L.H. Wong <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This is definitely an uneven movie. At the one hand I liked the concept of the movie and it also was quite funny and original to watch, while at others the movie was being incredibly lame and even somewhat annoying.
It was definitely fun and interesting to see a modern take on the 'The Hunchback of Notre-Dame' story, that very loosely still follows the Victor Hugo novel. The movie came up with some good original and fun stuff at times but it at the same time also made some very odd choices. For instance what was with the whole weird sexual type of relationship between Quasimodo and Frollo? It are these sort of odd decisions that also makes this a really bad movie to watch at times and makes you go; WHY?!
The casting was not that great either. Both Patrick Timsit (who also directed the movie) and Mélanie Thierry, as Quasimodo and Esméralda, mostly annoyed me, though on the other hand Richard Berry as Frollo was quite good and enjoyable. It's of course not just due to the casting or actors but also the script and dialog itself aren't always that great or clever, so sometimes some of the characters seem lacking.
A bit of a fun fact about this movie; even though it's a French production with of course some very French characters in it and a classic French story, the movie got entirely shot in Portugal. It was probably because filming in Paris can be a real pain and probably is very expensive as well. They most likely also couldn't get permission to film in- and outside of the Notre Dame, so they did a search for a church that looked similar enough and that's how they eventually ended up in Portugal. Most of the people watching this movie probably won't even notice but I have to say that while watching this movie I never got a French vibe from its atmosphere and environments. And I now finally learned why that was the case.
I still laughed and thought it was a funny movie for most of the time, so despite all the criticism I can still somewhat recommend it, though obviously not wholeheartedly.
0 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this