Kyatapirâ (2010) Poster

(2010)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A Nutshell Rerview: Caterpillar
DICK STEEL26 March 2010
Directed by Koji Wakamatsu, Caterpillar takes a clear and hard anti-war stance with its explicit warnings, vivid images of brutality and questioning of just what war means and will result in. Complete with archived documentary film reels that come from both news and propaganda, it tells the story of the effects of war through a husband and wife, where the former has returned from his tour of duty serving in the Emperor's Asia Pacific mission, complete with 3 highly decorated medals, a major tribute printed in the newspaper, but with the price of having lost all limbs, now left with just a torso and a head.

The film poses a few questions very early on about war itself. What good are commendations and medals when one is left limbless and at the mercy of others to feed, clothe, bathe you, and just about every other basic human function requires care given, as part of karmic retribution for having to survive a battle when countless of others get killed under one's hands. It's the ultimate torture for someone who once dish out punishment against helpless civilian victims, now unable to function normally, not even speak to express desires.

How can someone be hailed as a war hero, when being a hero in this sense meant the killing of others, like the twist in the adage that states not to die for your country, but to make the other poor bastard die for his instead. And if put under the context of the Japanese invasion of Asia as the film portrayed, how does rampaging, pillaging, raping and killing bring one honour or glory, especially in the senselessness of war that cannot be justified, what more being hailed as a god by many others, balanced by the ultimate mockery of sorts by being put on a pedestal like a caged animal in a zoo, since Tadashi Kurokawa (Keigo Kasuya) becomes the poster boy for his dedication and sacrifice in the name of the throne.

Tadashi aside, the film also takes on another more important and engrossing perspective through that of Tadashi's wife Shigeko (Shinobu Terajima, who got the Silver Bear for Best Actress at last month's Berlin Film Festival), initially shocked by the image of a husband who's more than a cripple, being maimed both physically and emotionally, and to balance that expectation set by society of the dutiful wife who will stand by her husband no matter the costs, and live the vows of being there for better or for worse. Keigo Kasuya may have the more technically challenging role of expressing himself through his eyes only, but Shinobu Terajima brings forth her character's development superbly, as one initially very reluctant and fearful of other's perception, to one who learns how to capitalize the turning of tables to dish out revenge long overdue, especially when she holds the upper hand in rewarding good behaviour brownie points to a sex-addicted husband (yeah, he can still function below the waist). In many ways, it's a close examination of the live of the Japanese woman during war, and societal pressures put on them at the time.

Like the insect, Tadashi spends much of his life eating, sleeping, and requesting for plenty of sex, that it becomes nothing more than a routine cycle to feel alive, until guilt pours over him when given a chance to reflect, and us as the audience as well, the atrocities committed by troops. The other interesting aspect of the film is how Wakamatsu includes elements of how simple living Japanese folk practise for that eventuality of an air strike and invasion of enemies troops on their soil, with civil defense type drills like bayonet fighting and fire fighting being pretty much the standard lessons learnt by the villagers. Bookend by archive footage and the telling of stark statistics of WWII, Caterpillar will stick to you long after the credits roll, and it certainly doesn't detract from its intended hard messages and fluff into a narrative butterfly.
30 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quite good
zetes19 May 2013
Though he's not credited, this film seems to be based on a story by Edogawa Rampo, which has previously been adapted in the anthology film Rampo Noir. This film transports the story to the WWII era. Keigo Kasuya returns home from the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1940 a quadruple amputee - no arms, no legs - without the ability to speak. His wife (Shinobu Terajima) is reviled, but soon falls back into her position as loyal spouse. The film examines the patriotic fervor of the times - Kasuya is declared a "war god" and is worshiped by the locals. Privately, the couple's life is Hell. A power struggle arises between them, and Terajima - who before the war was a victim of abuse by her husband - realizes she has power that she didn't have before. The political aspects of the film are the most interesting part. The focus on sex - which was the main focus of Rampo's story - gets a tad boring after a while. Both leads are fantastic, particularly Terajima, who obviously has a lot more to do. The film could stand to look better - it was filmed digitally and transferred to film, and is very murky. All in all, it's quite good.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Another provocative opus from Director Wakamatsu
najania12 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
In premise, "Caterpillar" (the English translation of the title of a short story by masterful mystery author Edogawa Ranpo on which the movie draws heavily) may call to mind Trumbo's "Johnny Got His Gun", but whereas the latter dwells entirely on the slug of a man left from the battlefield, the former actually focuses on the wife who must care for and cater to a deified deformity of a husband. Director Wakamatsu walks the viewer through the war with newsreel footage and announcements from the "Daihonei" Imperial Headquarters, which duped the public into thinking their forces were winning victory after victory. There is also the text of the article prohibiting capture or surrender from the "Senjinkun" (Combatants' Code), which was distributed to all soldiers in early 1941 under the name of Hideki Tojo, and was a key factor behind the suicidal attacks and just plain suicides (voluntary or compelled) by Japanese soldiers throughout the war. Kurokawa (the husband) comes back limbless and mute, but there is nothing wrong with him downstairs, as his hapless wife soon discovers. There ensues a kind of sexual warfare between the two, portraits of the emperor and empress solemnly gazing down at the lurid scenes all the while, that lasts as long as the war. I took Kurokawa's attempted suicide as an attempt to end his personal torment, not as a sign of repentance for his own crimes per se. No one saves or is saved in this flick.

After the intense fixation on the couple and the rural home front, the A-blasts and war's end seem to break the spell, and the film embraces a more general anti-war sentiment. I felt this diluted the impact, but audiences (especially those in Japan) will do well to ponder the figure of 20 million on the screen at the film's end for the estimated WWII death toll in Asia alone.

Shinobu Terajima turns in a bravura performance as the wife (though she looked laughably incongruous standing in a rice paddy, farming implement in unaccustomed hand, her fair and flawless complexion shining under the sun - far cry from a sun-beaten peasant- woman!), and Shin Onishi, a creditable one in a difficult role.

Wakamatsu again showed courage in making this film, as he did with "United Red Army". I guess this is why mention of his name often elicits groans in Japan. He must be doing something right.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Traditional horror with zero supernatural elements; war is more terrible than fake gore.
suite9216 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The film is full of flashbacks, and one of the early ones was of Kyuzo and all the village dressing up for his departure from the village into the military.

Most of the film takes place after Kyuzo is a veteran of the war between China and Japan around the time of World War II. He lost both legs and both arms in combat, his head is about 40% burned, and he is deaf. His speech is adversely affected by the lack of hearing.

His wife Shigeko is horrified with this from the start. She tries to strangle him, but does not have the strength. The villagers honor Kyuzo and his achievements, such as they were, in China. They encourage Shigeko strongly to take care of the hero, the War God.

Shigeko learns to deal with his eating, waste, bathing, and sexual functions. She takes care of him, which is an large daily effort, an enormous effort over an interval of years. She also works in the rice fields with the other villagers during the day.

He tries to learn to write/draw with his mouth and pencil, starting with 'I want to do it.'

She parades him around the village dress in uniform and medals. Sometimes she leaves him in the cart to watch her work in the rice fields.

About half way through the film, she really gets into being the put-upon wife, and insists on his performing his responsibilities as well. She gets lots of attention for this, and he gets a taste of all the work (done by others) that he generates. Also, she becomes very conscious of the fact that he can no longer beat her. After some time in this steady state, Kyuzo starts having bad memories of what he did in China. Plus his obligations as War God never seem to go away.

By 1945, the war started to come to Japanese soil. The radio in Japan reports something entirely different. Shigeko starts getting inwardly discouraged with the horrible things that have happened. Kyuzo has more flashbacks of his bad deeds in China.

Toward the end of the war, she needs satisfaction, but he has trouble even being aroused, since he's too obsessed with the bad memories. She slings back in his face the horrible things he said to her before he left for war. At one point, just seeing the flame in their evening lantern brings back the memories of rotten things he did, and how he lost his limbs. This is when she sings a song about a caterpillar, which is what her husband reminds her of.

-----Scores-----

Cinematography: 7/10 Archival footage was in out of focus sepia; in other words, it sucked rocks.

Sound: 8/10 OK, but not great.

Acting: 9/10 Fine.

Screenplay: 8/10 The story hangs together well. More cohesion about the flashbacks would have been nice.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a powerful anti-war movie
tploomis18 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The husband returns to his Japanese mountain village from the Sino-Japanese war without arms, legs, ability to talk or hear much, apparently brain-damaged, and badly scarred on the face and scalp. The horror of this person's existence is amplified by the contrast with the patriotic and disconnected propaganda from the Japanese government and media that the village folk all seem to swallow without question. He is proclaimed a living War God with medals and a framed laudatory news article that hang on the wall. The village people line the streets to welcome home the living War God, cheering and marching in copy of military march, and the living War God is delivered to his unbelieving wife. Taking care of this lump of flesh will be her task from here on. She tries. She puts the food in one end, sometimes sacrificing her own food to meet her husband's demands, and wipes up the other end. He eats, sleeps, eliminates, and demands sex. This goes on and on, and one can imagine the wife's life of drudgery in an endless cycle stretching into the distant future.

Her husband has never been a nice person. He beat her on a daily basis before marching off to do his patriotic duty in war, and now that he is back, he continues to demand from her. At first food and sex, which he demands through grunts and facial expressions, are gratifying to him, but as time goes on, these lose all their appeal. As a soldier he had raped a woman in China, and the memory of this comes back to haunt him and interfere with any pleasure from sex. His wife puts him in a cart and parades him around the village, the limbless living War God on display.

The wife is dutiful but increasingly angry and despairing, and the tour of the village with her husband in the cart becomes a kind of revenge for her. Eventually in private she is mashing raw eggs into his mouth and slapping him. All the while she is looked up to in the village for her patriotic sacrifice.

This movie is a grim commentary on the discrepancy between patriotic imaginings of war and the actual brutality of war and its tragic consequences. The movie ponders the consequences of societal pressure to do one's duty on the battlefield and in marriage.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
very impressive
kristbauer22 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
A soldier from the Chinese-Japanese war returns to his home village. Being completely disabled (no limbs, facial burns, impaired hearing and speech), his survival seems a miracle and he soon is being proclaimed to be a "god of war". His wife, suffering from the burden of care and his unfaded crudeness towards her, becomes to understand the absurdity of the war and war propaganda, but brings herself to enjoy the compliments from the villagers about how well she cares for the "god of war" and clings to singing propaganda songs to calm down herself.

Repeated power failures and the dimming of his room with only the flame of a petrol lamp left make the soldier recall the memories of him raping and slaughtering a Chinese woman in a burning house. Unable to articulate himself he is haunted and overwhelmed by his fault and eventually commits suicide.

The story tells us that war does not create heroes but only victims, in the first as well as the last front line -the wife at home. The movie doesn't need sentimentalism or any bloody reflections of the war - except for the repetitive showing of the soldier's crime. In fact, most of the acting is set in the house of the couple. The film conveys its message very subtle but thus even more mind shattering: I remember the scene where the body stump of the man is seated in typical Japanese tradition in the middle of the room, slightly lifted on a pillow, and circumvented by war insignia and a newspaper article about the "lord of the war". Sitting in this honorable position, you couldn't think of a better picture to show the absurdity and pitifulness of his existence as " god of war".

I strongly recommend this movie. The acting is great. It has deserved many people watching it.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Powerful Performance from Shinobu Terajima
pdmc-234605 February 2017
Koji Wakamatsu's anti-war film Catepillar (2010) is notable for it's strong anti-nationalism stance and Shinobu Terajima's powerful performance as a long suffering wife dealt a poor hand in life (one in which she won an acting award at the Berlin Film Festival). Her husband is returned from war, as a "God of War" with decorations, without limbs, the ability to speak or hear. Her role as a good wife of a soldier of the Emperor's is to take good care of him-a thankless task for a man who only eats, sleeps, and demands sex from his wife. Furthermore, we learn that he was an abusive husband and has committed atrocities in the war in China. Wakamatsu is a member of that older generation and has an ax to grind-one that the nationalists of today wouldn't be so happy about either. It's a difficult film to watch, but perhaps necessary since most of the new generations are unaware or unbelieving of the atrocities committed at war by the Japanese in the name of the emperor due to whitewashing to history textbooks in schools.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Adaptation snub?
axe_hallorann18 May 2011
I wonder why the short story of the same name is never given credit. Especially since it was written by Edugawa Rampo*, the "father of Japanese mystery". Is this blatant plagiarism or is the story so famous that it needs no reference? The film is intermediate in its adaptation, keeping the general premise of a limbless veteran and his tormented wife. The Rampo text is much darker and depicts the wife as relishing in sexually teasing her "lump of flesh". The film version adds visualizations of the "caterpillar's" war crimes in China during WWII; memories of which haunt the miserable creature. Unfortunately, the film tends to dwell on the tedium of their lives (eating, sleeping, "sex") and not the psychological/physical abuse that the wife perversely doles out.

*Edugawa Rampo is a phonetical pronunciation of Edgar Allen Poe in Japanese: "Edugaw-Aram-Po"
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Kyatapirâ
gcuadros30 March 2022
9/10. Powerful movie about the horrific impact of the Pacific War and World War II as a whole, particularly on the Japanese home front and the brutality of atrocities committed by the Japanese military during the war.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A story of love, hate and nationalism
borgolarici20 May 2021
What happens when the war ends and you're not one of those lucky survivors who came out of it mostly unscathed? When the belief system you built your entire life upon crumbles?

A violent, limbless veteran and his almost equally broken wife, are an example of what could happen. And it's not a nice thing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hard To Imagine All Of This Occured Not Too Long Ago.
DarkSpotOn2 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Imagine the movie Antichrist just in a war manner, that's what this movie kinda is. A grieving couple together struggling. The movie is a history lesson about what occurred during the wars, there's actual war footage in this film briefly.

As stated grieving couple: Husband came from the war, without his hands, and legs, and is paralyzed and can not speak at all. Nobody knows that the real reason why he is paralyzed is because of his rape of a Chinese woman, and the flames burned them both. Everyone is treating him as a God, cuz he fought the war. While his wife is trying to provide the best she can for him. Both of them spiral into madness. They argue constantly. The husband has always been abusive we learn that in the end.

The movie is very slow. There's not a lot of stuff going on. It's the couple not being able to work stuff out after the husband got back the way he did.

There isn't a lot of depth in these characters. I think what could have benefited the movie if he had 20 minutes of a backstory, to maybe get our characters to be developed a bit more.

The only negative i can give this movie is its length. The movie keeps hitting the same points over and over again, the movie could have been probably 20 minutes shorter. But that won't kill the movie to you.

I never was bored during the movie, but it is a slow-paced film. Pretty much the movie is divided in three segments: The beginning, the middle and the ending. Crazy how during the two segments everyone worked so hard, you had everyone outside, and then when they lost, nobody was outside, except maybe two people. And obviously, after the Japanese lost the main character ends it all because he wasted his whole life on ultimate failure.

I LOVED the two movies about Japan in World War 2 that's Man Behind the Sun and Grave of the Fireflies. Go check this out of curiosity and if you liked slower movies, they just showcase grief like AntiChrist.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed