4.4/10
265
6 user 5 critic

Harvest (1998)

R | | Drama | 12 March 1999 (USA)
A DEA agent and a local sheriff have to wrestle with their consciences as they start raids on local farmers, who have started growing marijuana simply to keep their farms operational. Story... See full summary »

Director:

Stuart Burkin

Writers:

Jim Biederman (screenplay), Stuart Burkin (screenplay) | 1 more credit »
Reviews

On Disc

at Amazon

1 win & 1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Arthur J. Nascarella ... DEA Agent (as Arthur Nascarella)
Stephen Earnhart Stephen Earnhart ... DEA Agent
Evan Handler ... Ray Baker
Wil Horneff ... Andy Yates
John Slattery ... Sheriff Bill Johnson
Jeffrey DeMunn ... Jake Yates (as Jeffrey De Munn)
Lisa Emery ... Alice Yates
Michael P. Moran Michael P. Moran ... Henry Upton
Frederick Weller ... Bucky Upton (as Fred Weller)
Pat Jordan Pat Jordan ... Molly - Day Waitress
James Van Der Beek ... James Peterson (as James Van Derbeek)
Kris Park ... Phil Jones
Anthony Ruivivar ... Roberto Fuentes
Paula Garcés ... Mina Fuentes (as Paula Garces)
Roy Barnitt Roy Barnitt ... Big John
Edit

Storyline

A DEA agent and a local sheriff have to wrestle with their consciences as they start raids on local farmers, who have started growing marijuana simply to keep their farms operational. Story focuses on a young man, who accidentally discovers that his straight-laced parents are involved in the marijuana cultivation. Written by John Sacksteder <jsackste@bellsouth.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for drug content and language
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Goldheart Pictures

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

12 March 1999 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Cash Crop See more »

Filming Locations:

Oxford, Pennsylvania, USA

Company Credits

Production Co:

Goldheart Pictures See more »
Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

Color
See full technical specs »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Not a bad film at all
7 July 2001 | by xhari_nairxSee all my reviews

I got to see this film because my friend wanted to see Dawson Creek stoned. She got what she wanted, the dude was in the movie for about two scenes he was high as a kite. But the movie isn't about that and it's not a stoner comedy as the ads make it out to be. This actually turned out to be the best movie that friend rented in a while, though that's not saying much. It's a drama about small town farmers who decide to grow marijuana to survive in troubled times. The best part of the film was the storylines involving the farmers themselves and the local Sherriff and DEA agent. Those storylines are realistic and provide interesting motivations and insights about marijuana production and the role of law enforcement. These farmers are not bad people and, while they may be a little naive, they are simply trying to survive when they're only other option would be losing their farms. While the DEA agent offers by the books interpretation of what they do, the Sherriff is conflicted because he knows why they are doing it and he wonders if a big pot bust would be bad for the small town's psyche.

The film bogs down with the story of the farmer's son, an innocent and earnest Will Horneff. This isn't a pro-legalization film, if anything the Horneff character is the moral voice of the film. His character is angry about his parents growing weed not because he's afraid of their well-being with the DEA sniffing around, but because he believes it's simply a bad thing to do, even though he hangs around kids who smoke it all the time. His intolerance grows as it get's closer to home. Even though much of the film tries (and succeeds) to be even-handed about the issue, in the end it has a pretty clear anti-weed stance. All the characters who do smoke weed are jerks. The dealers are jerks, even the sexist brother of the cute candy-striper. The only characters involved with it with any redeeming value in the film are the farmers, and of course, they are just doing it to survive. This is somewhat disappointing, whether or not it was a case of the film-makers not havingenough guts to remain neutral or it was the film-makers asserting their point of view. The film is strongest when it is neutral, but the fact that in the end the film isn't neutral doesn't kill it.


6 of 6 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 6 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending TV Series With Prime Video

Explore popular and recently added TV series available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial



Recently Viewed