Here's our roundup of the best new series of the year so far, and where to watch them.
Related lists from IMDb editors
Related lists from IMDb users
Title: Eyes Wide Shut (1999)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Tom Cruise | ... | Dr. William Harford | |
| Nicole Kidman | ... | Alice Harford | |
| Madison Eginton | ... | Helena Harford | |
 |
Jackie Sawiris | ... | Roz |
| Sydney Pollack | ... | Victor Ziegler | |
|
|
Leslie Lowe | ... | Illona |
|
|
Peter Benson | ... | Bandleader |
| Todd Field | ... | Nick Nightingale | |
| Michael Doven | ... | Ziegler's Secretary | |
| Sky du Mont | ... | Sandor Szavost (as Sky Dumont) | |
|
|
Louise J. Taylor | ... | Gayle (as Louise Taylor) |
|
|
Stewart Thorndike | ... | Nuala |
|
|
Randall Paul | ... | Harris |
| Julienne Davis | ... | Mandy | |
|
|
Lisa Leone | ... | Lisa |
2001: A Space Odyssey and Eyes Wide Shut are just the beginning of Stanley Kubrick's legacy. Are you up to speed on the film icon's style?
After his wife, Alice, tells him about her sexual fantasies, William Harford sets out for a night of sexual adventure. After several less than successful encounters, he meets an old friend, Nick Nightingale--now a musician--who tells him of strange sex parties where he is required to play the piano blindfolded. All the men at the party are costumed and wear masks while the women are all young and beautiful. Harford manages to find an appropriate costume and heads out to the party. Once there, however, he is warned by someone who recognizes him, despite the mask, that he is in great danger. He manages to extricate himself, but the threats prove to be quite real and sinister. Written by garykmcd
Eyes Wide Shut is ill-suited for the summer movie corridor. It has no explosions, no running, shouting, or a single gunshot. What it has are long scenes in which characters talk to one another. Slowly and carefully. The problem is that the film is marketed as having white-hot sex scenes and plenty of gratuitous nudity, while it has neither. There is plenty of naked flesh, don't get me wrong, but in exactly the opposite way that the ads make it appear. This is not a movie about being sexy and naked -- it's a movie about how flesh is just another part of being human, so what is all the fuss about? The marketing campaign is misleading, and led to disappointment in the audience that I saw the movie with, who were just looking for some skin.
The tension in the plot and the issues that the film discusses aren't telegraphed to the audience, they're hinted at in the dialog. There is no neat resolution at the end, life simply goes on. You may watch the whole film and think "that wasn't about anything!" Then think about what you've seen and realize it has a great deal to say.
The film is a meditation on sexuality and how it relates to marriage, death, and money. It's a fascinating commentary on modern life, and a rare movie that dares to examine sex as impassionately as any other issue.
The directing and cinematography alone would be worth the price of admission without the social commentary. The sets are an integral part of the movie; they breathe and glow and live. Kubrick was a master director, and he uses long shots and dissolves to great effect. Cruise and Kidman are at their best, and the supporting cast is also strong. It's Kubrick's magic work with the camera that holds the film together.
All in all, definitely worth seeing for the un-uptight. It's possible to watch this film and actually think about it for hours afterward. That's something you won't get with the Wild, Wild West.