6.5/10
5,212
57 user 41 critic

FairyTale: A True Story (1997)

Trailer
1:33 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Prime Video

ON DISC
In 1917, two children take a photograph, which is soon believed by some to be the first scientific evidence of the existence of fairies.

Director:

Charles Sturridge

Writers:

Albert Ash (story), Tom McLoughlin (story) | 2 more credits »
Reviews
1 win & 3 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Harvey Keitel ... Harry Houdini
Jason Salkey ... James Collins
Peter O'Toole ... Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Lara Morgan Lara Morgan ... Jean Doyle
Adam Franks Adam Franks ... Adrian Doyle
Guy Witcher ... Denis Doyle
Joseph May ... Houdini's Assistant
John Bradley John Bradley ... Portly Gentleman
Anna Chancellor ... Peter Pan
Florence Hoath Florence Hoath ... Elsie Wright
Phoebe Nicholls ... Polly Wright
Leonard Kavanagh Leonard Kavanagh ... Stage Manager
Elizabeth Earl Elizabeth Earl ... Frances Griffiths
Paul McGann ... Arthur Wright
Anton Lesser ... Wounded Corporal
Edit

Storyline

Based on factual accounts, this is the story of two young girls that, somehow, have the ability to take pictures of winged beings... which certainly causes quite a stir throughout England during the time of the first World War. Everyone, except the girls who think it's quite normal, are excited about this "photographic proof" that fairies exist... even the great Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Harry Houdini pay the girls a visit. Written by BOB STEBBINS <stebinsbob@aol.com>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Believe.


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG for brief mild language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Details

Country:

UK | USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

24 October 1997 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Fairy Tale: A True Story See more »

Edit

Box Office

Opening Weekend USA:

$3,515,323, 26 October 1997, Wide Release

Gross USA:

$14,036,249, 11 January 1998
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The last film of Don Henderson. See more »

Quotes

Harry Houdini: Never try to fool children. They expect nothing and therefore see everything.
See more »

Connections

Version of Photographing Fairies (1997) See more »

Soundtracks

The Coming Of The Queen
Composed by Zbigniew Preisner
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

What's next? "Tinkerbell: A True Story"?
26 September 2003 | by billyfishSee all my reviews

Let me start by saying I liked this movie. It has wonderful cinematography, an interesting story line, and a competent cast which evokes the period in question (WWI England). I probably wouldn't have watched it having seen the title, but while surfing the satellite channels, I came upon a scene with Peter O'Toole and Harvey Keitel, and I was transfixed.

It's true that the story was inspired by a true story. I deliberately say "inspired" rather than "based" since the filmmakers did not base much of anything on reality. It's true that two girls (16 and 10, not the younger ages depicted in the movie) revealed photographs they had taken of "fairies" in the woods, and it's also true that Arthur Conan Doyle ate it up like Orson Welles at a smorgasbord. That's where the true part of the movie begins and ends.

Really, the filmmakers should be ashamed of themselves for adding "A True Story" to the title. They graphically and unequivocally showcase the fairies/gnomes/little people flying, scrambling, and cavorting in the woods -- if this is "true," why not come out with their own set of "Cottingley photos"? The movie is very entertaining, it's a well-done fantasy and has a magical air to it, but please! Please don't call it a true story! It's an insult to the movie audience.

Leaving out that the girls themselves, in later years, admitted the photos were faked, and leaving out that the poses of the "fairies" are identical to those in an illustration in a book of poems and stories that the girls no doubt possessed, one can tell instantly that the photos are fakes, and in my mind, not even clever ones. Conan Doyle was so gullible that he is on record disbelieving American "psychics" the Fox sisters when they themselves admitted their antics were all a hoax! He maintained that the spirits were acting through the sisters, even if they didn't believe so and were deliberately faking their seances! So let's not attach too much importance to Doyle believing in these fairy pictures. And Houdini is thrown in there for no good reason, simply because the writers discovered that he and Doyle were friends.

Still, as I say, it's an engaging movie, well acted and filmed. I would have much preferred the director had left out the fairy scenes. Without those, they could have kept the true story aspect in all honesty, leaving the audience to decide whether the girls were charlatans or not. Leaving "A True Story" in the title is not only dishonest and misleading, it detracts from what otherwise is a very compelling and entertaining tale of two little girls and a wartime public, some of whom were desperate enough to believe in fairies!


3 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 57 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending TV Series With Prime Video

Explore popular and recently added TV series available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial



Recently Viewed