Wolf (1994) Poster

(1994)

User Reviews

Review this title
184 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Nicholson is a wolf... no surprise
Rammstein-24 December 2000
I like this film. It is different as a horror movie, because it really isn't a horror movie - and yet here we have a man turning into a wolf, he starts killing people at night, and we have the rabid horror music stalking our ears when the wolf is on the prowl.

I like the characters, I like the slow pace and the calm moments and I especially like Jack Nicholson when Randall's senses start to come alive. He is extremely well cast for this film, I don't think many others would actually convey the animal inside like he does. Pfieffer's character is, although formulaic, a relief among all the hard-assed men of this film. The ending is a bit silly, but nonetheless odd and intriguing.

Yep.I like this movie. It's fun to watch and it's great to see Nicholson act like the animal we all really think he is but don't dare to find out.
63 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Brilliant visuals and excellent acting create a very underrated film.
PyrolyticCarbon8 November 1999
I saw this film when it first appeared in the cinema and I can remember my disappointment at the wolf scenes. Now, five years on, I realise what a gem this film is.

The cinematography is very well done, providing slick shots throughout which still hold their own against current films. The acting is very good with James Spader oozing sleaziness with every single look, Michelle Pfieffer playing a hardened woman, and Jack Nicholson being, well, Jack Nicholson, but hairier.

The opening sequence grabs you straight away, stock shocks, but they work fantastically, from then on I found myself impressed on just about every following scene.

Nicholson is very good at underplaying the beginning of his transformation as he starts to discover his newly heightened senses, but he comes into his own when his powers bring him new found confidence and self assurance.

Some of the wolf effects are a little cheesy, and the appearance of David Schwimmer playing a cop caused me to flash into Friends mode - he even has a friends-like line, could he _be_ anymore Ross like? Aside from these little niggles the film has an excellent love story with fantastic interaction between Nicholson and Pfieffer with some wry dialog. It's got great lighting and very good cinematography throw in a superb Morricone soundtrack and a cool ending and you've got a great film.
47 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wolfman Jack?
bsmith555228 October 2002
"Wolf" is not your average blood and guts horror flick. Rather it is a high budget drama with horror overtones with a top notch cast skillfully directed by Mike Nichols.

Jack Nicholson stars as Will Randall a meek book editor whose life suddenly is thrown into turmoil when he is bitten by a wolf while driving home from a business meeting. Suddenly he begins to feel younger and more energetic and to have keener senses of smell, sight and hearing. But to his horror, he begins to experience memory black outs during which several tragic events occur. He gradually comes to realize that he is taking on the characteristics of a wolf.

At the office, Randall has just been fired from his job by owner Raymond Alden (Christopher Plummer) and his place taken by the arrogant brown nosing Stewart Swinton (James Spader). Randall also learns that Swinton has been having an affair with his wife (Kate Nelligan). At that time he meets Alden's beautiful but self-centered daughter Laura (Michelle Pfeiffer) and naturally they become involved (Who wouldn't howl at the moon after spending the night with Michelle Pfeiffer?).

When Randall's wife is murdered, he begins to fear the worst so he turns to Laura for help in helping him to subdue his urges. But is he guilty murder? We have to wait to find out what's really going on until the last part of the film.

The performances by all cast members are top notch. Nicholson as usual stands out as the tragic, doomed Randall. Pfeiffer (who is a much better actress than she is given credit for) is excellent as Laura. Plummer is suitably oily and manipulative as Alden and Spader is really good as the over ambitious Swinton. Look for David Hyde Pierce in a small role as Randall's assistant and look real close for David Schwimmer as one of the cops who tries to arrest Randall at the zoo.

An off beat but different sort of horror film.
36 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jack Nicholson gets bitten by a wolf, and gets even.
mack317517 May 2002
A cool new take on a werewolf story. Will Randall(Jack Nicholson)is your every day nice guy, who does'nt seem throw many punches, his best friend and coworker Stuart Swinton(James Spader) steals his job Has Senior Publisher, and his wife Charlotte(Kate Nelligan) is cheating on him. But something interesting happens to him. While driving home after a business trip, he accidently hits a wolf, and when he gets out of his car and tries to touch it, the wolf bites on the hand. Suddenly Wills senses start working in overdrive, He starts seeing farther then normal,and hearing farther also. And he starts able to smell things other people can't. He starts feeling great enough to fight back, And he will now start throwing punches. But happens when Will's Wolf instincts start taking over? One of the best werewolf movies in a long time. Jack Nicholson was great, really to perfect for this role. A different take on the werewolf story. Its a howling classic.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hollywood rendition about mythical werewolf with all-star-cast and grand production design
ma-cortes23 December 2013
Grisly horror , thrills and chills in this enjoyable terror film starred by an excellent protagonist trio, Jack Nicholson , Michelle Pfeiffer and James Spader . Wolf is a creepy terror movie that have you breathless . Publisher Will Randall (Jack Nicholson) suffers a car accident when is attacked by a wolf as he has turned into a werewolf . Randall is developing an extraordinary force and to be aware himself there happened more than a crash and has a horrible curse who cannot to control . Will becomes a werewolf at each full moon and has to fight to keep his job against his competitor colleague (James Spader) . Then he undergoes a dental and hirsute transformation at the night and going on a murderous rampage every time the moon is full. He increases strength , heightened senses and unnatural sexual impulse and he sprouts hair and pointy ears . Inside every man there are two people-one good, one beast . Meanwhile , Randall is accused for his wife's (Kate Nelligan) death and fall in love with the gorgeous daughter (Michelle Pfeiffer , though Mia Farrow was slated to play her and Sharon Stone turned down the female lead) of his shrewd boss (Christopher Pummer) .

This exciting chiller displays thriller , drama , action , suspense, terror , werewolves fights , a love story with mysterious touches and turns out quite entertaining . It's some different but with clear references to former films dealing with werewolves . Good performances from Jack Nicholson as a notorious publisher who is bitten by a werewolf and becomes one himself and the beautiful Michelle Pfeiffer along with James Spader . This was the second movie that Jack Nicholson and Michelle Pfeiffer made together after The witches of Eastwick (1987) and their first since Jack played the Joker in Batman (1989) and Michelle played Catwoman in Batman returns (1992). Very good support cast plenty of familiar faces such as Richard Jenkins as Detective Bridger , Eileen Atkins as Mary ,David Hyde Pierce as Roy , Om Puri as Dr. Vijay , Ron Rifkin as Doctor , Prunella Scales as Maude , Brian Markinson as Detective Wade and special mention to veteran Christopher Plummer . The transformation of man into werewolf is complex and made by expert make-up artist Rick Baker , creator in ¨The Wolfman¨ , ¨Men in black¨ , ¨Grinch¨ , ¨Gorillas in the mist¨ and many others . The notorious screenwriters Wesley Strick and Jim Harrison provide a well-knit plot with mystery and horror , giving full rein to Mike Nichols natural talent for the genre . Jack Nicholson had been trying to get this film made with his friend, writer Jim Harrison, for 12 years . Colorful and evocative cinematography by the Italian Giuseppe Rotunno . Rousing musical score by the great Ennio Morricone who composes a sensitive as well as thrilling soundtrack ; however John Williams was originally attached to compose the music for this film .

This big budget motion picture was well directed by Mike Nichols (The graduate , Catch 22, Silkwood , Working girl , Regarding Henry , Closer) , though release was delayed for 6 to 8 months to re-shoot the entire third act . It's a nice terror flick and and turns out to be an acceptable attempt to cash in the werewolf sub-genre . Rating : 6,5 Good . Better than average and worthwhile watching .
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pass the wolfbane.
rmax30482319 March 2006
Well, Jack Nicholson is no Lawrence Talbot. In a way that's too bad because the original wolfman was trashy fun. This one is more ambitious and expensive, and it kind of loses its way.

The first half is a treat, and is witty too. Nicholson plays his schleppy character, someone without daring or imagination. It's no wonder that his wife is bored with him and his boss is firing him. Not that he's doing a bad job as editor-in-chief of a prominent New York publisher, just that he shows no guts.

After being bitten by a wolf one night, he begins to notice slight changes in his appearance and his character. (He checks it out with a doctor but otherwise treats these changes kind of nonchalantly, if you ask me.) For one thing, he sleeps most of the day and works best at night. His sexual appetite returns and he begins to get frisky around his wife again. It would be interesting to know a little bit more about the details of THAT. He can smell alcohol on someone's breath from several feet away. He can hear conversations on the other side of a window across a wide hallway. He walks more quickly, speaks more forcefully, and is overall more animated, so to speak. He even gets a neat-looking growth of new hair across his balding forehead, and he as he pauses to look admiringly at himself in the mirror, patting his belly with satisfaction, beaming at his new hair, he remarks, "And by the way, I'm not only the president of the Men's Hair Club. I'm also a member." His level of aggression rises too. He outwits the nefarious subordinate (James Spader) who's been plotting to replace him, and he blackmails his boss into rehiring him and giving him even more authority. And after sloughing off his unfaithful wife, he meets and mates with the boss's lovely daughter (Michelle Pfeiffer), who looks half feral on her own.

The scheming and exploration of Nicholson's new personality are the best-written part of the movie. The rest of it gets kind of screwy, as if the writers had begun to run out of steam. Nobody seems able to determine what kind of movie this is supposed to be. Nicholson's wolfiness turns dangerous. He may have ripped the throat out of his errant wife during a gibbous moon. We KNOW he's chased down a deer and eaten the thing alive because he wakes up covered with blood, in an unpleasant scene.

After he bites Spader, Spader begins to turn into a werewolf too, only uglier and meaner than Nicholson's werewolf. The two werewolves get into a dogfight over Pfeiffer and Spader is about to win when Pfeiffer appears on the scene and shoots him and kills him. (Where'd she get the silver bullets from -- the Lone Ranger?) Nicholson has now turned permanent werewolf and after a few friendly growls of thanks in Pfeiffer's direction he hustles off alone to join the rest of the werewolves in the forest. Somebody -- I forget who -- has also bitten Pfeiffer, which is understandable, and then she begins to morph into a wolf and leaves to join Nicholson in the woods where, presumably, they will live happily ever after and produce litter after litter of pups doggy-style.

I can't help it if the second half of the movie sounds a little nutty. It has suddenly turned into a half-hearted horror movie with slashing fangs, a woman threatened with rape, Nicholson shaking frantically at the bars of his cage, a dead body in a pool, and similar inanities.

None of the performances are at fault. Nicholson is pretty convincing as he gradually morphs. And Spader is great as the loyal friend who turns out to be a backstabbing phony. Too bad their efforts are put into a scenario that devolves into something that makes less sense than Lawrence Talbot's predicament.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wolf Power
sol121821 July 2009
**SPOILERS** After hitting a wolf, the first one seen in the wild in the state of Vermont since 1900, with his car on his way driving home to New York City publishing house vice president a concerned Will Randell, Jack Nicholson, tries to see what he could do to help the injured canine. All of a sudden the what at first look like a dead wolf came alive and viciously bit Will on his right hand.

It's later at his job that Will begins to act and even look a bit strange with what is obviously the results of the wolf bite he received. Being ultra sensitive to smells and sounds with his eyesight now improved to a super sharp 20/10 vision the mild mannered Will also becomes violently aggressive, like the alpha-wolf who bit him, in what he wants on and off the job. This all doesn't go too well with Will's co-worker and rival for his job as vice president of his book publishing firm Stewart Swinton, James Spader. Swinton has for some time tried to get Will's job by working behind his back in getting his boss Raymond Alden, Christopher Plumer, to transfer him out to the firms Eastern European-a dead end job- branch! Beside that Swinton is also having an affair with Will's cheating wife Charlotte, Kate Nellign, who's looking to improve her lifestyle by hooking with the the young and aggressive up and coming star of firm.

Will who was more or less willing to go along with him being transfered to Eastern Europe now becomes more then ever determined to not only stay on his job in NYC but get back at both Swinton and his boss Raymond Alder for trying to screw him out of it!

Making a shambles of Alder and Swinton's plans for him Will also gets romantically involved with Alden's strong willed and beautiful daughter Laura, Michelle Pfeiffer, who had never gave him as much as a second look. It's in Will's not being intimidated by her it's my way or the highway father that strangely attracts Laura to him as well as his new found free spirit and love for the great outdoors. It's also Will's confrontation with that back-stabbing yuppie Swinton, in the firms mans washroom, that has Swinton soon take up the same wolf-like characteristics that he has. This leads to Swinton changing for the wimpish and gutless conniver that he is to a man of animal-like strength and murderous ferocity that he's soon to become. This sudden change in Swinton leads to the inevitable life and death confrontation that he has with Will at the climax of the film "Wolf".

***SPOILER ALERT*** In "Wolf" the wolfish Jack Nicholson does one of the best interpretation of a wolf-man since Lon Cheney Jr did back in 1941. In fact Nicholson does it with a fraction of the makeup-job, as well as with no computer-enhanced special effects that Cheney did it with in his staring in the classic horror film of the 1940's "the Wolfman". In the end not only Will but Laura give up on civilization and end up in the wilds of upper New York State that now seem more at home to them then where they used to reside: The Big Apple. As for Swinton his reckless attempt to both murder Will and rape Laura backfired on him with him making it possible, by his vicious attack on Laura, for the two to get out of town and live together in the wilds that they now call home.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Didn't do much for me, a bit of a wasted opportunity.
poolandrews30 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Wolf starts as New York book editor Will Randall (Jack Nicholson) is driving through New England when he run into a wolf, he gets out to see if the wolf is still alive & it is because it bites him on the hand & then runs off into the woods. Soon after Will starts to notice changes, the area around his hand wound starts to grow hair & his senses suddenly become exceptional including not needing glasses to see anymore. The publishing company he works for is being taken over by Raymond Alden (Christopher Plummer) & he is fired to be replaced by his protégé Stweart Swinton (James Spader) but the usually mild mannered & meek Randall suddenly develops an aggressiveness as he fights to regain his old job...

Directed by Mike Nichols the main question I ask myself after watching Wolf a few hours ago is 'why?'. The script by Jim Harrison & Wesley Strick is a strange mixture of horror film, black comedy, drama & romance which don't really come together that well. There's the plot where Randall is bitten by a wolf & starts to turn into a Werewolf himself, there's the plot about Randall losing his job& using his new found aggression to get it back, there's the cheesy romance between Nicholson & Pfeiffer's character's as well as some emotional turmoil revolving around Randall's wife having an affair. At times it felt like I was watching three different films but starring the same people. According to the IMDb's 'Trivia' section the release of Wolf was delayed by about 6 to 8 months so the entire third of it could be completely re-shot & I am convinced this is true as it explains perfectly why none of the story threads & plot lines come together that well & it just fizzles out into a standard 'bad guy gets killed & the hero & his girl live happily ever after' type ending which I imagine the studio heads at Columbia Pictures insisted on, it would be very interesting to find out just what the original 40 odd minute final third was & what happened in it although I doubt we ever will. At over 2 hours in length Wolf is far too long, it's a tad dull as well as there's not much wolf action in it. I suppose the moral of the film is that we all have a bit of animal survival of the fittest type aggression in us & we shouldn't be afraid to use it to our benefit, & why not! Still, at over 2 hours this bored me & not enough happened.

Director Nichols doesn't do anything special here & the film is rather bland, lifeless & dull. There's no style here, there's nothing scary, there's no tension & the tacked on re-filmed twist ending is rather predictable. As already noted by many it's ironic that some of the best special make-up effects guy's in the business at that time worked on Wolf including Rick Baker who did the groundbreaking effects on An American Werewolf in London (1981) & George Lucas' special effects company ILM yet they were brought in to created obviously very low key effects that the likes of Ed Wood or Al Adamson would have done due to lack of budget. For instance when Nicholson turns into the wolf all the effect consists of is large bushy sideburns, contact lenses & plastic fangs. It's all rather underwhelming & uninspiring. Forget about any gore as there isn't any & there's no nudity either.

Apparently this had a budget of about $70,000,000 which I find astonishing, Nicholson was paid a nice tidy $13,000,000 & I suppose 40 odd minutes were junked & totally re-shot but even so 70 big ones sounds like a lot of money to me considering what ends up on screen. This has a decent cast including Nicholson, Michelle Pfeiffer & James Spader while British viewers may notice Prunella Scales from Fawlty Towers (1975 - 1979) in a small role.

Wolf is an inexplicably big budget horror film without much horror, it's plot is loose & doesn't really come together in any satisfying way at the end. I was disappointed. But I'll get over it so don't worry. Watch a decent Werewolf film like An American Werewolf in London again instead.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unapologetic and serious modern monster movie
pyrocitor17 August 2007
Ever since the 1940s, filmmakers attempting to make a new monster film, in the vein of the classics Dracula or The Wolf Man are often saddled with the contempt or disbelief provoked in response by contemporary audiences, leaving the end result either comedic or a camp attempt at a thriller incapable of being taken seriously or enjoyed by anyone other than caffeine riddled thirteen year olds. After numerous of said attempts, it was refreshing, to say the least, to experience a film which would normally fall under the aforementioned category, but which took its subject matter in a straightforward and serious fashion, helmed by a quality filmmaker and with a strong enough cast to properly sell some of the less credible aspects of the production. The result was Wolf, a modern werewolf film not intended as a joke or cinematic money grabber, but instead an intelligent look at the themes which thrilled 1940s audiences in a contemporary context.

Director Mike Nichols should be commended for instilling his subject matter with enough dramatic intensity to appeal to an adult demographic, without forgetting the primary intent of such a film - to thrill and chill its audiences in turn. But rather than milking the audience's emotions with a series of oh so trite horror clichés, Nichols is willing to forgo outright shock value screams for a continual chilling sensation - a more subtle and ultimately more eerie touch many modern hackneyed attempts at horror could learn volumes from. Adding to Wolf's credibility is some creative and intriguing camera work, although the continued use of slow motion during dramatic points does begin to appear hokey after a while, despite working brilliantly at other points.

The quality of the film is also strongly aided by a strong script, brilliantly paced between frights and character development; also a rarity considering the genre, and with just enough fleeting moments of perfectly placed comedic relief. The ever reliable Ennio Morricone contributes a wonderful score, a sublime tribute to the horror films of old without ever seeming clichéd. The filmmakers should also be commended enormously for resisting the temptation to overload the werewolf character with special effects, and take the classic makeup route instead. In an industry inundated with computer altered special effects, there is something very laudable about seeing an actual actor covered in prosthetic hair giving an actual performance, rather than a CGI created monstrosity. Whether intended as a tribute to the original Wolf Man (the facial hair designs are unmistakably familiar to Lon Chaney Jr.'s infamous antihero) or simply taking inspiration from it, the makeup works enormously well, and gives a welcome dose of nostalgia in a modern incarnation of the genre.

The casting of Jack Nicholson as a modern day werewolf may have immediately come across as a very mixed blessing, inciting excitement that such an iconic actor was taking a shot at a part which seemed tailor made for him, and fear that Nicholson might simply coast by on the premise, and indulge in his tendency to drift over the top to the point of pantomime, effectively ruining the intent of the film. Thankfully, Nicholson also had the credulity to take his subject matter seriously, and emerge with a perfectly tuned performance. Nicholson channels his legendary charisma into an entirely credible character, riddled with pathos and dark menace, easily dispelling fears that his facial prosthetics might come across as laughable, and emerging with a surprisingly powerful and very serious performance. Michelle Pfeiffer gives a tremendously charismatic and entirely believable performance as Nicholson's surprisingly well written love interest - rather than being reduced to screaming and floundering around, Pfeiffer injects her character with real human emotions, taking what could have been a routine romantic lead and nearly stealing the film in one of the most impressive performances in her career. James Spader makes a deliciously slimy antagonist, and classy support is provided from Kate Nelligan, Richard Jenkins and Christopher Plummer.

What might have degraded into cheap watered down horror trash culminated as an intelligent, mature and unapologetic modern monster thriller, made all the stronger by its firm, capable direction, intelligent and wonderfully paced script, with excellent performances from Nicholson and Pfeiffer. Wolf makes a wonderful modern take on the Wolf Man classic right down to the facial prosthetics, and is easily worth seeing for any fans of the genre in the mood for a horror film which refuses to patronise its audience - a very refreshing change.

-8/10
57 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated! Truly underrated!
SerpicoJones9 October 2010
First time I saw Wolf more than ten years ago. I barely remembered anything more than Jack Nicholson's supercool performance. So, it was nice rediscover.

If you take Wolf as a serious horror film you probably get huge disappointment. But if you take it more like a satire about back- stabbing-ass-kissing-sweet-revenge world we live in today, then you'll probably get huge enjoyment out of this.

The story about strife between the two co-workers in the publishing house is cleverly mixed with the werewolf story. The dialog is witty and there are many cool quotable lines (I've been offered a choice between no job and a job no one would want.)

As a pure horror film Wolf fails because it goes maybe too melodramatic at times and there isn't much shocking moments in it. Though the Gothic views over nocturnal New York were very classic horror moves. But as a satire Wolf works almost perfectly. And Wolf is one of the few movies that leave some questions unsolved but I feel satisfied about it (usually I want all the answers in the end).

Overall, Wolf is enjoyable drama but not so much of the horror film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Jack Nicholson pulling a lot of silly faces and howling at the moon.
Pedro_H17 February 2004
An publishing executive gets bitten by a wolf and starts experiencing life changing characteristics - however this might have its sideline advantages!

What a strange film this is. Utterly bizarre in that it seems to want to mix boardroom politics with cheap horror stunts to the point that you wonder if you are not watching two separate films side-by-side!

Michael Pfeiffer plays the big bad publishers daughter and this being a movie she naturally finds balding late middle aged Jack irresistible. After a few parts where she seems to be trying sadly she is slipping back in to her old zombie state again. Let me tell you something darling, not trying and crows feet don't mix. Just ask Glenda Jackson.

I am not sure what this is supposed to be and I am not sure why it was made. The werewolf part seems almost incidental to the central plot and you wonder if it is just a novelty item thrown in to disguise what it really is - a very dull boardroom struggle film.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Classy Werewolf Story
ccthemovieman-117 September 2006
Here's a werewolf movie done with some style and some class. This may be the only werewolf-business world combination. It features effective villains played by James Spader and Christopher Plummer. I've always found Spader an easy guy to dislike, in any film.

Jack Nicholson is the lead guy, however, and is refreshingly low-key, especially for him. I don't believe he ever raised his voice in this movie, acting very subdued throughout.

There isn't as much action as you see in most modern-day horror movies but yet this is such an intense story that you don't lose interest. It's pretty good in the visual department, too, and it doesn't hurt to ogle Michelle Pfeiffer.

Even though the profanity is pretty low for a '90s film, when it's there it's needless. They could could have done this movie, believe it or not, without any and it still would have been good. I'm not complaining. I still recommend this, but not for people who are looking for an action--packed vampire film.
96 out of 109 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nicholson is the central point of interest...
Doylenf17 September 2006
WOLF is worthwhile just to watch JACK NICHOLSON have fun with the character of a man who has been bitten by a wolf and begins taking on the abilities (and some additional hair) of the keenly aware animal. He shows with a flair of his nostrils that he's assuming a new self awareness and sense of smell that comes with developing animal traits. That takes up about the first half of the movie.

It's when the plot goes into overdrive that we get into trouble. We witness him outsmarting a phony co-worker (JAMES SPADER, who seems to specialize in being nasty), and watch how he manipulates his boss (CHRISTOPHER PLUMMER) with his new skills.

It's a fascinating idea but doesn't get full development in the screenplay once the wolf has made its mark on Nicholson. Instead it becomes increasingly apparent that the writers were running low on ideas and the story was getting just a little too preposterous for comfort.

Still, if you're a JACK NICHOLSON fan, you owe it to yourself to see this one. MICHELLE PFEIFFER makes good eye candy but not much else can be said about her acting skills here.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
12 years later, still crap
pankstar5 September 2006
I had forgotten what a terrible film this was. Just re-watched it, and in the beginning, I thought maybe I was wrong, but halfway through the wheels fall off. Werewolf movies all generally tend to suck from a technical point, and frankly I can't believe anyone is commenting good or bad, when you consider, the trainwreck of a screenplay, along with the usual mediocre performances of Pheiffer and Spader. Let's give them both more roles that could go to actual actors, if we keep casting them they'll have to learn to act at some point.

I see in the trivia that they had to re-shoot the third act. I have to wonder how bad could it have been? I always assumed that at least 3 directors worked on this. I can't believe it was one director.

I feel sorry for Jack, who seemed be having a midlfe need to re-visit the world of Roger Corman. Had he only know that he still had quite a few great performances left.

The moral of the story: If you want to revisit Corman, then revisit Corman..himself. Don't try and do camp with Mike Nichols. And truly, there is only one role suited for Spader, the re-make of the Prisoner, because no matter what the role, Spader does Patrick MacGoohan in the Prisoner. It's all he can do. The pinheads have remade every other TV show...
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A mature werewolf flick
Deviant-715 March 1999
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was a welcome change from the typical werewolf flick. First off, we have Jack. Jack rules. Also, we have a good story that relates to adult life. This movie seems to pay tribute to classic werewolf films such as "The Wolf Man" with its basic formula of: Normal man, man bitten, man realizes something wrong, man discovers cool abilities, man uses abilities, man's abilities become out of control, man seeks help, man gets mystical amulet, man seeks resolution. It works very well, and this movie has great acting in it. Consider it a corporate werewolf flick, a more mature look at the beast in all of us.
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Werewolf Movie as Character Study
LanceBrave13 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
For a brief period in the earlier nineties, Hollywood started making horror movies for grown-ups, major directors producing a series of glitzy, big budget takes on classic monster movie archetypes. The wave started with Coppola's "Bram Stoker's Dracula," continued with Kenneth Branagh's "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein," and concluded with Mike Nichol's "Wolf," which had no source material to take an author's name from. (I guess "Mary Reilly" counts too but we don't like to talk about it.) It's a traditional werewolf story steeped in Hollywood drama prestige.

Literary editor Will Randall's life is stale. His marriage is mostly loveless and his boss is looking to replace him with a younger, more ambitious co-worker. Things begin to change after Will is bitten by a wolf while driving in Vermont. His senses improve, being able to smell details he never noticed before. He is more energetic and physically stronger. He even winds up starting a new relationship with the beautiful daughter of his boss. However, at night, he stalks around as a half-human werewolf. And then the bodies begin to pile up.

"Wolf" is the werewolf movie as character study. Mike Nichols isn't much interested in bloody horror action. Instead, he focuses on how Will's predicament changes his life. At first, his new status as a werewolf improves things. His cut-throat attitudes leave him better prepare to handle his downsizing. A literal animal magnetism attracts a new woman that looks like Michelle Pfeiffer circa 1994. Their sex life doesn't suffer any. When his nighttime adventures become bloody, it weights on Randall's mind. He angsts about the murder of his wife and chewing off a mugger's fingers. In the latter half, the focus is squarely on his struggle to contain the beast within. Nichols even uses the werewolf device to indulge in some satire. Randall literally marks his territory, scaring off his younger rival by peeing on his shoes. The movie's attempt to compare the business world or modern manhood with the world of animals has little effect on the overall story.

The film's strength as a character study is mostly thanks to an A-list cast. By this point in his career, Jack Nicholson had started coasting on his reputation. He's more engaged then usual in "Wolf." Amusingly, the movie puts a leash on Nicholson's typical theatrics for most of its runtime. He does a good job playing bored domestic schmuck for the film's first half. As the werewolf transformations begin to affect him more, Nicholson allows more of his typical style to shine through. It helps that Nicholson has strong chemistry with a smolderingly sexy Pfeiffer. They first trade typical barbs at first, masking their mutual attraction with hostility. It's a little unbelievable how quickly the relationship progresses but, hey, that's movies for ya'.

Another ace bit of casting is James Spader as the villain. His character is a boot-licking corporate ladder climber. He clearly has no concerns for anyone but himself even if he claims otherwise. His attempts to make nice are so obnoxious that you can't help but hate the guy. These qualities play to Spader's strength as an actor. In the last act, now afflicted with the werewolf condition, Spader cuts loose, dropping smarmy one-liners while casually tearing through minor characters. You honestly wish you could have seen more of Spader and Nicholson going at each other, two hammy actors competing to see who's hammier.

Those looking to "Wolf" for typical monster movie thrills are likely to be disappointed. Rick Baker created gruesome, mind-blowing werewolf transformations in "American Werewolf in London." "Wolf" is a much more low-key affair. Nicholson's werewolf amounts to contact lens, fangs, and some hair on his face and hands. It invokes the classical werewolf style while also giving you a good idea of what Jack Nicholson would look like as Wolverine. Spader's werewolf form is a little more complicated, gaining a bumpy forehead. Nichols is obviously not comfortable working in the horror genre. The one attack scene, where Jack tears loose on some muggers, is awkwardly directed. He often punctuates the werewolf scenes with melodramatic slow motion. The climatic werewolf duel provides one or two decent moment, even if a wolfed-out James Spader wielding a pair of hedge clippers is deeply goofy.

Helped along by an elegant Ennio Morricone score, "Wolf" proves a decently compelling film. It has one or two interesting takes on the werewolf legend while providing some good actors with solid material. Patient horror fans might enjoy it while Nicholson or Spader devotees are bound to get a real kick out of it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great werewolf thriller with a contrived ending
jonassladen1 October 2023
Have to say that I enjoyed the movie and feel that Jack Nicholson's portrayal of a man going through changes was brilliantly done. In fact his acting actually made for the success of the movie. You could absolutely sense his growing canine strength. My rating is high for all that.

But the movie's ending really missed the mark.

Detective Bridger would have never believed Stewart's details condemning Will without corroboration when they interviewed him at the station. And there's absolutely no way that the detective would have been stupid enough to believe Laura's alibi when the police arrived.

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the use of DNA evidence in criminal investigations had started becoming standard and I'm sure as well that in 1994, call tracing and forensics were good enough to totally destroy her story.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great werewolf flick, if you haven't seen it have a bite at it, you may even like it
Christopherreferee7 June 2018
Jack steals the show again with a great supporting cast of James Spader, Michelle Pfeiffer, Christopher Plummer and many more in this great werewolf movie that offers horror and romance.

Jack Nicholson stars as Will Randall a book editor on his way back home when he runs over an animal, little does Will know when he goes to check the animal, it is a wolf and it bites him. When he returns back to work he is intrigued to find that even though his job is failing due to the young executive Steward Swinton played by James Spader, that Will feels more alive than ever and he isn't backing down easily. His new powers of highly developed senses leave him feeling wonderful and new so much that he is falling for the ex boss's lovely daughter Laura Alden played by Michelle Pfeiffer but what he doesn't know is that his new senses come at a cost and it wants payback every full moon, can he keep Laura away from the beast within.

It certainly may not be the most popular werewolf movie of all time for many fans but I certainly find it a thrill to watch and the great chosen cast make that happen with a equally good music score form Ennio Morricone and excellent make up effects from Rick Baker. This is well worth a 10/10 from me and if you haven't seen it then have a bite at it, you may even like it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
And the point is.....
darin-wissbaum24 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I can't believe Jack was in a movie like this. Here is a guy that can write his own check and turn down any film role he wants and still get tons of offers, and yet he stars in this movie. OK it started out interesting with Jack getting attacked by some wolfs at night and I felt who else to play the part better of a wolf-man that Jack himself. However my spirits sank when I saw the result. When he turned into the wolf (if you want to call it that) he looked more like someone who needed a shave rather than some wolf creature. OK so he had better hearing and could ease drop on his co-workers which made for some fun but when I saw Jack running around on all fours howling at the moon I was laughing my head off. He looked silly and he must have wondered why he even took this part. I was thinking about some of the most classic films he ever did like Five Easy pieces, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, The Last Detail, Easy Rider and The Shinning. What made him go from that to this film? Who knows...I still love the guy but this film was embarrassing to watch.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
cerebral horror at its finest
dr_foreman22 June 2004
"Wolf" posits that the werewolf bite is not necessarily a curse, if what you really crave is a more wild and natural lifestyle than is possible in our "civilized" society. Quite cleverly, the story is set in a publishing company, an environment that is both civilized and predatory at the same time.

Nicholson gives one of his best performances of recent years here, playing against type - he's actually a nice, normal guy! Spader, on the other hand, does what he always does; he acts like a sleaze, and very good he is at it, too. Pfeiffer makes a tough, proactive heroine, and gets a much better part than you'd expect for a woman in a horror film (horror is very much a boy's genre, I'm afraid).

I'm going to get snooty here and suggest that most people just don't understand "Wolf," probably because its ideal audience is quite small. Fans of Nicholson's usual drama fare dislike the movie for its horror content, and fans of violent horror dislike the movie because it's lacking in action and gore. But if you like thoughtful horror that has more brains than blood, you're part of the small group of people who'll get something out of this.
93 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A cool version of the wolf man
Smells_Like_Cheese28 July 2002
Wolf is somewhat of a secret and under appreciated treasure in my opinion. I really do love this movie, it had a great story and terrific actors. Jack and Michelle just have such a sizzling chemistry and was perfect for on screen romance, their love making scene was just so sexy. The story also has some good scares, I loved James Spader as the villain, he's just perfect and so charismatic, those eyes were absolutely hypnotizing. Not to mention, Wolf doesn't have big fancy special effects, it mostly plays on our minds along with the story. It was very intelligent and well played.

Will is a married man who seems to have it all put together career and life wise. One night while he is driving in the middle of a huge snow storm, he finds a wolf, the wolf bites him and he's having symptoms of animalistic wildness. To top this off he gets passed over for his promotion and looses his wife to the smooth under taker, Stewart. But he ends up meeting, Laura, a beautiful young lady and things start to look up when he's getting his way, only now he's waking up to find body parts in his pockets. But he also learns that there's a new wolf in town when he finds out about a murder of someone he knew and wonders if the wolf is taking over.

Wolf is a very cool and excellent horror movie, like I said the cast was just perfect and the sets were very haunting. The ending just rocked, it's one of my favorites actually, but I'm not gonna tell, just because this is a movie you'll have to see. This is one of the top werewolf movies that I would recommend to people, it's just a fun flick to watch and if you are a fan of Jack, Michelle, or James, I know you will fall in love with it.

7/10
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
the mentality of the werewolf
SnoopyStyle1 April 2015
Will Randall (Jack Nicholson) hits a wolf while driving on a snow covered road. As he checks on the animal, it bites him on the hand. Will's job is in danger when the publishing house gets taken over by wealthy Raymond Alden (Christopher Plummer). His underling Roy (David Hyde Pierce), protégé Stewart Swinton (James Spader) and author Maude Waggins (Prunella Scales) all vow to support him. Alden demotes him to eastern Europe while giving his editor-in-chief job to Swinton. It turns out that Swinton had pitched vehemently for the job behind his back. Will is tired and meekly accepts his fate. Then he starts to change. His heighten sense of smell uncovers his wife Charlotte (Kate Nelligan) cheating with Swinton. He starts a relationship with Raymond's daughter Laura (Michelle Pfeiffer) with Raymond's disapproval. He seeks out Dr. Vijay Alezais (Om Puri)'s help with the animal spirit possession. With his new powers, he takes revenge on Swinton and his wife. When his wife turns up dead, Detective Bridger (Richard Jenkins) investigates.

Director Mike Nichols is trying to dig into the mental transformation of the werewolf character. On the surface, this could be fascinating with Nicholson being so obviously wolf-like. Pfeiffer is not winning in this sour role. Spader is as always sleazy. Plummer gives a run-of-the-mill effort. Nicholson is bitten with the opening credits and his transformation isn't as compelling as it should. Horror fans are probably bored with the first half and unimpressed with the weak effects. On the other hand, Nichols fans won't find the acting that special. Nicholson peeing on Spader is a nice move. The movie is too long. The tension and the dread isn't there. I don't sympathize with anybody here. It is fun to see David Schwimmer in a small role right before he gets Friends but not much else is fun in this movie.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A nearly perfect synthesis of realism, satire and horror
guy-bellinger3 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Mike Nichols is not always an inspired director but in this case HE IS ! Quite amazingly but undeniably, he manages with this gem to achieve a nearly perfect synthesis of the realistic, satiric and horror genres.

The theme of lycanthropy , provided by Jim Harrison's exciting screenplay, is made all the more interesting since it applies to real life, to the soulless society surrounding us. We have an expression in French "l'homme est un loup pour l'homme" (Men are wolves to other men ) which could not be illustrated in a better way than by this somber movie. Indeed, the werewolf theme (unfortunately ) applies to perfection to our money-minded, cynical,mercantile environment.

Also very interesting is the fact that lycanthropy is presented from two angles, the first violent and painful ( like in dozens of such like stories ) the second positive and exhilarating ( a much more seldom approach ). Will Randall not only suffers from the change in his mind and body but he sees his senses becoming keener, his abilities develop and his combativeness strengthened. And putting all these new qualities to good use,he turns into the dark avenger of the frustrated viewer.

The dark romantic ending ( the couple becoming wolves ) avoids the trite happy end and the terror effects are very satisfactory. I particularly vibrated at the fight between Nicholson and Spader, in the middle of which poor Michelle Pfeiffer is ruthlessly brutalized.The opening sequence ( worried Nicholson driving in a beautiful but unsettling snowy landscape ) is also memorable.

Nicholson, Pfeiffer, Spader and Plummer are all excellent and complement each other to perfection.

Shame on those who disparage this masterpiece.
33 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classy horror flick
lastliberal15 March 2007
Look in the bushes! Is it a dog? Is it a cat? No, it's Wolf, brilliantly portrayed by Jack Nicholson. By day, a mild-mannered senior editor at a book publisher who eschews pop culture for quality work; a man who would never publish such trash as "If I Did It" (Youdid it OJ, be a man and admit it). His job is being lost to a suck-up (James Spader) to the mega-media baron (Christopher Plummer) until he discovers his new powers that came as a result of being bitten by a wolf. Discarding his wife, who is having an affair with Spader, he hooks up with the moguls daughter, the luscious Michelle Pfeiffer, who he charms in the Jack Nicholson way.

Now, I have to ask here, how does Nicholson get all those great lines to woo the babes? I remember when he used that famous "You make me want to be a better man," in As good as it Gets. Well, there is an equally great one in here: "I've never loved anybody this way. Never looked at a woman and thought, if civilization fails, if the world ends, I'll still understand what God meant." I am going to have to start collecting these to try out.

The film had some great acting, some great writing and great music. I was really very watchable as horror flicks go - no nasty scenes.

How does it end? You know that someone has to get bitten, and someone has to get their throat ripped out, but you have to watch it to see who.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Did they read the script?
Clarence-Worley-8620 June 2022
The fact this movie has all of these great actors in it amazes me. This was the stupidest most ridiculous movie i have ever seen. Between the slow motion action sequences and terrible dialogue i was hysterical laughing the whole movie. Jack has to be ashamed that he was involved in this monstrosity. Skip this and watch American werewolf in London, or Ginger snaps.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed