In 2028 Detroit, when Alex Murphy, a loving husband, father and good cop, is critically injured in the line of duty, the multinational conglomerate OmniCorp sees their chance for a part-man, part-robot police officer.
Thirteen years after the original Robocop, Delta City, considered to be "The Safest Place On Earth!", has become a futuristic city owned and operated by OCP, and RoboCop, Alex Murphy has ... See full summary »
Maurice Dean Wint,
Maria del Mar
RoboCop 4 aka RoboCop IV The Future of law enforcement. Starring Richard Eden, Yvetten Nipar, Blu Mankuma, Sarah Campbell, Andrea Roth, David Gardner. With Special Guest Stars Cliff DeYoung... See full summary »
Cliff De Young,
The mega corporation Omni Consumer Products is still bent on creating their pet project, Delta City, to replace the rotting city of Detroit. Unfortunately, the inhabitants of the area have no intention of abandoning their homes simply for desires of the company. To this end, OCP have decided to force them to leave by employing a ruthless mercenary army to attack and harass them. An underground resistance begins and in this fight, Robocop must decide where his loyalties lie.Written by
Kenneth Chisholm <email@example.com>
According to Fred Dekker, the return of ED-209 was always a part of his screenplay. See more »
When Robocop is set on fire by the splatterpunks, the Robo suit is clearly a different one; being more bulky and cumbersome than the one seen throughout the rest of the film. Clearly it has been adapted as a fireproof suit for the stuntman inside. See more »
All right, if you gotta "RoboCop," you got an AlienCop? Huh? You gotta GhostCop?
Sergeant Warren Reed:
Leon, I told you I don't have time for this!
You gotta VampireCop?
See more »
Although less violent than the two preceding Robocop films, the BBFC still cut 4 seconds from the UK cinema and video versions, possibly to remove a brief glimpse of nun chucks. See more »
Easily the worst of the franchise, but a boatload of fun none the less!
Before I begin, let me get this out in the open: Robocop 3 is easily the worst movie of the trilogy.
OK, now the rest of the review.
Though this is the worst movie of the series, Robocop 3 manages to find a way to redeem itself (be it intentionally or unintentionally) by being incredibly cheesy, and ultimately a load of fun! The film doesn't even really seem to be a direct continuation of the series, though it does reference the first movie several times via flashbacks. The story is just about as dull as it could get, and the acting leaves much to be desired. Not to mention, the one saving grace this film could have had (special effects) does nothing to help save the movie from falling to "B-Movie" status.
I'm not sure why Peter Weller was not brought back for this one, but I think he was wise to avoid it. Robocop has been reduced to cheesy one-liners, and badly choreographed fight scenes. However, I think this adds to the movie's charm. The film seems to take a very tongue-in-cheek look into the world of Robo, and this saves it from being a complete failure. Also, it seems as if the writers or director were watching a lot of Japanese anime, one of the main villains in the film is a ninja who is seemingly unstoppable; many of his scenes are so stylized you'd swear you're watching an anime. Rip Torn also adds to the film's silliness as the head of the corrupt corporation, OCP. He makes the main conflict in the film not even seem threatening due to the fact that he isn't menacing at all.
Overall I'd say this film is more of a comedy than a sci-fi flick. It contains so many cheesy moments that it's best enjoyed with a small group of friends (my close friend opined once "This is what Mystery Science Theater 3000 was made for," how right he was). If you are a fan of the series because of the grittiness and realism displayed in the first, avoid this entry. However, if you're looking for a good cheesy popcorn style sci-fi film, by all means, get some friends together and have fun! This film was made to be laughed at!
14 of 19 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this