Arthur loses his fortune for staying with Linda, right as the two were preparing to adopt a child. As their marriage suffers, Arthur plans for a way to get his money back, but first he must sober up and get a real job.
In this sequel to the 1981 hit movie, Arthur manages to lose his entire $750 million fortune. Will the former millionaire playboy be able to survive as a broke, unemployable alcoholic? To add to Arthur's problems, wife Linda's biological clock is ticking louder than ever, and she's pressuring him to start taking responsibility for himself.Written by
Jean-Marc Rocher <firstname.lastname@example.org>
"Arthur 2" was definitely not as good as the first one but then again, "Arthur 2" was really the best that you could do with a sequel to the original. I mean, where do you go after the happy ending of "Arthur"?
There were some very funny lines in the film and it was nice seeing the cast re-unite, but for some reason the original Susan who was played by
Jill Eikenberry was replaced by Cynthia Sikes, who looks very different than Jill. Anyone know why the change?
Do I recommend anyone seeing this film? Only if you really enjoyed the first film otherwise you're not going to really be able to get into "Arthur 2".
12 of 17 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this