Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Movers & Shakers

  • 1985
  • PG
  • 1h 20m
IMDb RATING
4.2/10
605
YOUR RATING
Movers & Shakers (1985)
Studio head promises his dying producer and mentor, to adapt a popular sex manual into a film, despite his better judgment. Unable to figure out how to turn the nonfiction book into a narrative movie, Mulholland enlists the services of a screenwriter of popular romantic films with a bad marriage, and volatile director Sid Spokane to help him create a movie.
Play trailer1:48
1 Video
18 Photos
SatireComedy

Joe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a... Read allJoe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a best-selling sex manual "Love in Sex". Enlisting the help of depressed screenwriter Herb ... Read allJoe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a best-selling sex manual "Love in Sex". Enlisting the help of depressed screenwriter Herb Derman and rather off-centre director Sid Spokane to try and come up with an idea or two, ... Read all

  • Director
    • William Asher
  • Writer
    • Charles Grodin
  • Stars
    • Walter Matthau
    • Charles Grodin
    • Vincent Gardenia
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    4.2/10
    605
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • William Asher
    • Writer
      • Charles Grodin
    • Stars
      • Walter Matthau
      • Charles Grodin
      • Vincent Gardenia
    • 12User reviews
    • 4Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 1:48
    Trailer

    Photos17

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 11
    View Poster

    Top cast31

    Edit
    Walter Matthau
    Walter Matthau
    • Joe Mulholland
    Charles Grodin
    Charles Grodin
    • Herb Derman
    Vincent Gardenia
    Vincent Gardenia
    • Saul Gritz
    Tyne Daly
    Tyne Daly
    • Nancy Derman
    Bill Macy
    Bill Macy
    • Sid Spokane
    Gilda Radner
    Gilda Radner
    • Livia Machado
    Earl Boen
    Earl Boen
    • Marshall
    Michael Lerner
    Michael Lerner
    • Arnie
    Joe Mantell
    Joe Mantell
    • Larry
    William Prince
    William Prince
    • Louis Martin
    Nita Talbot
    Nita Talbot
    • Dorothy
    Sandy Ward
    Sandy Ward
    • Doctor
    Judah Katz
    Judah Katz
    • Freddie
    Peter Marc Jacobson
    • Robin
    • (as Peter Marc)
    Sam Anderson
    Sam Anderson
    • Ray Berg
    Frances Bay
    Frances Bay
    • Betty Gritz
    Luana Anders
    Luana Anders
    • Violette
    Gene Dynarski
    Gene Dynarski
    • Board Member
    • Director
      • William Asher
    • Writer
      • Charles Grodin
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews12

    4.2605
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    lor_

    Lightweight view of Hollywood

    My review was written in April 1985 after watching the movie at a Midtown Manhattan screening room.

    "Movers & Shakers" is an unsuccessful insider's look at the foibles of the creative end of Hollywood filmmaking. Comedy is only occasionally amusing and faces a bleak box office future. Pic was lensed without announcement to the trade last spring under the more appropriate title "Dreamers".

    First of twin stories concerns the production chief of a studio, Joe Mulholland (Walter Matthau), who is dedicated to making a meaningful, quality picture in tribute to his hero, ailing producer Saul Gritz (Vincent Gardenia). Buying the rights (literally, just the title) to the bestselling manual "Love in Sex" as a result of a deathbed promise to Gritz, Mulhollnad hires successful screenwriter Herb Derman (Charles Grodin) to try and come up with an idea for the impossible project. Meanwhile, second sory is about Derman, whio is having extreme personal problems with his withdrawn wife Nancy (Tyne Daly), who won't let him touch her.

    Mulholland is in trouble with his boss Louis Martin (William Prince) as thee studio, especially after installing a huge model dinosaur that cost $1,000,000 and "only moved a little" (for a special effects epic that never got made) as a monument to the man who dreamed it up, Gritz. As the film project goes awry, Derman's marital problems are paralleled by the slapstick violent relationship of the film's goofy directo Sid Spokane (William Macy) and his girlfriend, soon to be his wife, Livia (Gilda Radner).

    In his original screenplay for "Movers & Shakers", Grodin takes various potshots at lamentable filmmaking trends, including in-jokes such as the dinosaur which instantly recalls the recalcitrant title figure in Dino De Laurentiis' "King Kong' remake that co-starred Grodin. He scores his best points in presenting production meetings where a lot of thinking-out-loud occurs.

    Unfortunately, the film is overburdened with extensive voiceover narration by Grodin, which steals the spotlight from the central character expertly essayed by Matthau. What's more, we find out nothing about the personal life of Matthau's production topper persona, while the Daly-Grodin relationship remains cryptic and cannot sustain the emphasis placed upon it. Vet comedy director William Asher (who piloted the 1982 tv version of "Charley's Aunt" starring Grodin) fails to bring any visual style to this low-budget feature, whose talky format will probably play better on tv.

    An unusually interesting cast has been recruited, with solid support provided by Macy, Radner and Daly. Stev Martin guests in a seven-minute cameo s a Ramon Novarro-era latin star, but it is not prime comedy material and Martin's ego-trip spoof is similar (but inferious by comparison) to Billy Crystal's patented Frenando Lamas takeoff. It's also as pleasure to see Nita Talbot as an acerbic cowork, Joe Mantell as Derman's agent and in a small role, Luana Anders, who co-starred in 1964 in Grodin's first feature (for AIP), "Sex and the College Girl".
    10mbirchjr

    Awesome film

    One of my favorite films of all time. So very quotable with an unforgettable performance from Bill Macy. This film stands up to many, many viewings. I've seen it over 25 times.
    5theowinthrop

    A Strange Misfire Comedy.

    I am only giving this film a "5" out of respect for it's cast headed by Walter Matthau, Charles Grodin, Steve Martin, Bill Macy, Tyne Daly, Gilda Radner, Penny Marshall, and Vincent Gardenia. Otherwise it is a peculiar satire on Hollywood that never quite works.

    Walter Matthau works at a large studio, now run by William Prince. Matthau is a successful producer there, but his mentor was Gardenia, who was once a great producer. But Gardenia has been going downhill, both creatively and physically. He has wasted millions of dollars on a film about the prehistoric world, and has even set up a huge dinosaur from the film on the grounds of the studio (much to a fed up Prince's anger). But Gardenia is taken off all other projects. He is now dying, and Matthau goes to see him. Gardenia, on the death bed, forces Matthau to do a film on a book he has just bought: a sexual guidebook. Matthau says he will, knowing it is a ridiculous promise.

    After Gardenia's death Matthau takes a close look into the sex book. This is the most popular sex guide in America, but the point is brought out in the film that if one thinks of sex lightly, as a powerful explosion from the emotion of love, it is easy to show in film, on stage, on television, on radio, in novels and short stories, or in paintings and sculpture. But if the actual physical activities involved were to be studied in a film (not a pornography film, by the way), it becomes boring.

    Still Matthau tries. He consults with Macy, a fabled film director (involved in a torrid and complicated affair with Radner - it ends when they wound each other in a shoot out). Macy's approach is to remind us of all the great film lovers of the past (Bogart among them) and how "dependable" they were. Matthau talks to Grodin, a leading screenplay writer. Grodin can't see where the drama needed for the film will come in. Matthau is advised to see the last of the great silent film lovers, the "ageless" Martin (once a rival of Valentino). He keeps talking of decades old romantic moments - but all is for naught when Matthau and Grodin and Macy see Martin is now henpecked by his harridan wife (Marshall).

    As you can see the film certainly had great direction in the script, except that despite the energy of the cast it just never rose above the one point: that discussing the physical activity of sex on film is not going to make a good movie. Somehow the script dropped a somewhat promising element: that a desperate Matthau might start dropping away from what Gardenia wished and produced a film that was a sex comedy. But for that to have fully worked, Gardenia's wacko character would have had to be alive throughout the film, and he would have had to keep the sense of taking the credit for the success of Matthau's changing the production plan to save the project. That never happens.

    I think the film tried to be philosophical but never got beyond presenting the main argument. It was a poor choice to make. MOVERS & SHAKERS may never have been a promisingly great film, but it might have been an amusing one. It is not too amusing now. Definitely not worthy of it's cast's energies at all.
    1jotix100

    The film project

    Most films start with good intentions by all the people involved in its creative process. It's a nightmare for the studio that produces a film like "Movers and Shakers" to watch the project turned into a lemon that no one will ever see. In fact, it was a surprise this showed recently on cable. Based on some of the names involved in it, we decided to take a look. Well, let's assume all the people that participated in it, won't include this experience in their resumes for future jobs within the movie industry.

    It's also a puzzle as to why did a talented man of the stature of Walter Matthau ever saw in the possibility of this turkey having any future. For that matter, Charles Grodin, who wrote the screen play, is seen as a writer who hasn't figured out how to do an adaptation of the book the dying studio head wants to be made into a film. It appears that Mr. Grodin was writing about what would be his own role in this ill conceived movie.

    Better keep surfing channels until something better is found.
    6uptownmyrnafan

    Too Inside for Audiences ?

    i just got done watching this movie on TCM, & i found it very funny. i saw the listing with Matthau & Grodin, & i didn't even bother to read the synopsis. That was enough for me. The story about a studio that buys the title of a book, simply for the title -- not the subject of the book. the movie focuses on how the movie studios will focus group & committee an idea to death. (a la the TV series "Action"). the young studio hot-shot keeps complaining about the 'old' age of the people working on the project ('why him? what is he 50?'). typical of the youth obsession in Hollywood, & the discarding of people in their middle-ages. those with NO life experience who trash fine or even classic movies by doing flat & soulless remakes, by flat & soulless performers. or by making inane movies about TV shows just because they grew up on those shows. that's today's Hollywood : No Real Stars, No Real Personas. just flat soulless surgically enhanced hacks. Could anyone recognize an impression of any of todays so-called stars? (& no i don't mean their catch-phrases). where's the talent of a Bogey, Gable, Carey Grant, Bette Davis, or Myrna Loy. or of a Shirley MacLaine, Peter Sellers, Paul Newman, Jack Lemmon, or Matthau? they don't make talent like that anymore. before the movie Charles Grodin asked the question : "because of today's audiences having better knowledge of the Hollywood system, would the movie play better today than it did in 1985 ?" sadly based on the other reviews here it would appear that the answer is no. i gave it 6 stars. nothing special, just a good comedy that features two of the best at their craft : Matthau & Grodin.

    More like this

    The Lonely Guy
    6.2
    The Lonely Guy
    First Family
    4.3
    First Family
    Hanky Panky
    5.6
    Hanky Panky
    Haunted Honeymoon
    5.7
    Haunted Honeymoon
    I Ought to Be in Pictures
    6.1
    I Ought to Be in Pictures
    Pennies from Heaven
    6.5
    Pennies from Heaven
    Joe Gould's Secret
    6.6
    Joe Gould's Secret
    The Man with Two Brains
    6.4
    The Man with Two Brains
    Another Nice Mess
    5.8
    Another Nice Mess
    Twilight Theatre
    6.7
    Twilight Theatre
    All of Me
    6.7
    All of Me
    The Marriage Fool
    6.3
    The Marriage Fool

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Charles Grodin got some of his actors friends involved in trying to pitch the film. Himself, Steve Martin, Gilda Radner, Penny Marshall and Tyne Daly all agreed to work for the least amount of money the union allowed.did so without even reading the script. When the film was finally green-lit, Grodin received no salary for writing or producing the film, only the minimum for working five weeks as an actor: about five thousand dollars for two years of work (seven years in total since the inception of the project).
    • Goofs
      The huge prop dinosaur that is mounted on the lawn of the movie studio lot changes position in respect to nearby buildings several times throughout the film.
    • Connections
      Featured in At the Movies: Secret Admirer/The Goonies/Prizzi's Honor/Movers and Shakers (1985)
    • Soundtracks
      Can't We Go Home Again
      Words and Music by Mitzie Welch and Ken Welch

      Performed by Stephen Bishop

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ15

    • How long is Movers & Shakers?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 31, 1988 (Italy)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Official site
      • MGM
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Dreamers
    • Filming locations
      • California, USA(Location.)
    • Production companies
      • Asher-Grodin Productions
      • United Artists
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $372,438
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $9,580
      • May 5, 1985
    • Gross worldwide
      • $372,438
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 20 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Mono
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Movers & Shakers (1985)
    Top Gap
    What is the English language plot outline for Movers & Shakers (1985)?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.