| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Jack Lemmon | ... | Ed Horman | |
| Sissy Spacek | ... | Beth Horman | |
| Melanie Mayron | ... | Terry Simon | |
| John Shea | ... | Charles Horman | |
| Charles Cioffi | ... | Captain Ray Tower | |
| David Clennon | ... | Consul Phil Putnam | |
| Richard Venture | ... | U.S. Ambassador | |
| Jerry Hardin | ... | Colonel Sean Patrick | |
| Richard Bradford | ... | Andrew Babcock | |
| Joe Regalbuto | ... | Frank Teruggi | |
| Keith Szarabajka | ... | David Holloway | |
| John Doolittle | ... | Dave McGeary | |
| Janice Rule | ... | Kate Newman | |
|
|
Ward Costello | ... | Congressman |
| Hansford Rowe | ... | Senator | |
In September1973, in Chile, the American journalist Charles Horman arrives in Valparaiso with his friend Terry Simon to meet his wife Beth and bring her back to New York with him. However, they are surprised by the military coup d'état sponsored by the US Government to replace President Salvador Allende and Charles is arrested by the military force. His father Ed Horman, a conservative businessman from New York, arrives in Chile to seek out his missing son with Beth. He goes to the American Consulate to meet the Consul that promises the best efforts to find Charles while the skeptical Beth does not trust on the word of the American authorities. The nationalism and confidence of Ed in his government changes when he finds the truth about what happened with his beloved son. Written by Claudio Carvalho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Very short review.
Aesthetically this film is very impressive. The narrative build up is both subtle and intense. The conclusion is a tragic let down - which may make many uncomfortable about the film. But it as about a real historical tragedy, one that challenges some fundamental assumptions of the principles of American democracy. Objectively, this is true story with artistic embellishments for narrative purposes only - it tells no lies. So objectively and aesthetically it is an impressive film.
But it is in the field of morals and politics that this film really shines. This is about Allende, a person who embodied almost a Jeffersonian style of democracy; popular democracy, locally organised. Yes, he was a Marxist, but also a person who had included the national liberation orientation of Boliviar, but also, as mentioned, the Jefferson notion of democracy. Allende _believed_ in democracy. He _believed_ that you could be elected, the State would say, "OK, because we're fundamentally a democracy and so are you so we'll let you implement a socialist economy". Of course, he was wrong and it fundamentally challenges one's belief in the democratic system being a government "of the people, for the people and by the people".
Oh, the book is better. Much better.