IMDb RATING
6.7/10
3.4K
YOUR RATING
A bored wife leaves her husband for an unemployed, petty criminal.A bored wife leaves her husband for an unemployed, petty criminal.A bored wife leaves her husband for an unemployed, petty criminal.
- Awards
- 4 nominations
Bernard Tronczak
- Rémy
- (as Bernard Tronczyk)
- Director
- Writers
- Arlette Langmann(scenario) (adaptation and dialogue)
- Maurice Pialat(adaptation and dialogue)
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe first of four collaborations between director Maurice Pialat and actor Gérard Depardieu. They would later reunite in Police (1985), Under the Sun of Satan (1987) and The Son Of... (1995).
- Alternate versionsThe New Yorker Films American DVD release is the edited version eg the first sex scene between Loulou and Nelly is much longer in the video edition.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Sneak Previews: Victory/Condorman/Loulou/Under the Rainbow (1981)
- SoundtracksCélimène
(David Martial (as D. Martial) - Gilles Sommaire (as G. Sommaire) )
par David Martial (as D. Martial)
Disques CBS. Editions Bagatelle
Featured review
Pilat strives for realism, and succeeds
This is the pathetic story of a woman who leaves her well-off and educated husband for Loulou (Gerard Depardieu), an unemployed ex-con. The storyline doesn't deviate much from this premise outside of a few interesting anecdotes here and there, and the rest of the film is spent on depicting the interactions between the characters.
So why does this simple film deserve eight stars? In my opinion, it's because Pialat has focused his attention on a single element that dominates all aspects of its development: realism. Characters depicted are paradoxical and confused, just as many people are when it comes to love and relationships. There is no soundtrack to distract the viewer. Perhaps most interesting of all is the way the film is written and acted; every line seems spontaneous, not scripted and polished. Because of this, the film really succeeds in the impression that you really are looking through a window into people's lives. It's all great cinema; the techniques used in this film really should be used more frequently.
Make no mistake, though: this is an actor's film. All three of the leads are equally brilliant. We can feel the raw emotion when one of them make a sudden outburst, though we may not always understand their motivations. This movie certainly would not have been the same without them.
I recommend this film to anyone who enjoys art-house cinema.
So why does this simple film deserve eight stars? In my opinion, it's because Pialat has focused his attention on a single element that dominates all aspects of its development: realism. Characters depicted are paradoxical and confused, just as many people are when it comes to love and relationships. There is no soundtrack to distract the viewer. Perhaps most interesting of all is the way the film is written and acted; every line seems spontaneous, not scripted and polished. Because of this, the film really succeeds in the impression that you really are looking through a window into people's lives. It's all great cinema; the techniques used in this film really should be used more frequently.
Make no mistake, though: this is an actor's film. All three of the leads are equally brilliant. We can feel the raw emotion when one of them make a sudden outburst, though we may not always understand their motivations. This movie certainly would not have been the same without them.
I recommend this film to anyone who enjoys art-house cinema.
helpful•71
- rosscbeauregard
- Feb 27, 2012
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Der Loulou
- Filming locations
- La-Queue-en-Brie, Seine-et-Marne, France(lunch party)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 41 minutes
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.66 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
