Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Lord of the Rings

  • 1978
  • PG
  • 2h 12m
IMDb RATING
6.2/10
38K
YOUR RATING
The Lord of the Rings (1978)
Blu-Ray Combo Pack trailer
Play trailer1:20
19 Videos
88 Photos
Adventure EpicDark FantasyHand-Drawn AnimationSword & SorceryAdventureAnimationFantasy

The Fellowship of the Ring embark on a journey to destroy the One Ring and end Sauron's reign over Middle-earth.The Fellowship of the Ring embark on a journey to destroy the One Ring and end Sauron's reign over Middle-earth.The Fellowship of the Ring embark on a journey to destroy the One Ring and end Sauron's reign over Middle-earth.

  • Director
    • Ralph Bakshi
  • Writers
    • Chris Conkling
    • Peter S. Beagle
    • J.R.R. Tolkien
  • Stars
    • Christopher Guard
    • William Squire
    • Michael Scholes
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    6.2/10
    38K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Ralph Bakshi
    • Writers
      • Chris Conkling
      • Peter S. Beagle
      • J.R.R. Tolkien
    • Stars
      • Christopher Guard
      • William Squire
      • Michael Scholes
    • 371User reviews
    • 78Critic reviews
    • 51Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 1 win & 3 nominations total

    Videos19

    The Lord of the Rings
    Trailer 1:20
    The Lord of the Rings
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: Is It Safe?
    Clip 1:34
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: Is It Safe?
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: Is It Safe?
    Clip 1:34
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: Is It Safe?
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: Skill With A Blade
    Clip 1:14
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: Skill With A Blade
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: We're Not Alone
    Clip 0:45
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: We're Not Alone
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: We Have To Get Out Of Here
    Clip 0:48
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: We Have To Get Out Of Here
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: There Is Still Hope
    Clip 0:55
    The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy: There Is Still Hope

    Photos88

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 80
    View Poster

    Top cast70

    Edit
    Christopher Guard
    • Frodo
    • (voice)
    William Squire
    William Squire
    • Gandalf
    • (voice)
    Michael Scholes
    • Sam
    • (voice)
    John Hurt
    John Hurt
    • Aragorn
    • (voice)
    Simon Chandler
    Simon Chandler
    • Merry
    • (voice)
    Dominic Guard
    Dominic Guard
    • Pippin
    • (voice)
    Norman Bird
    Norman Bird
    • Bilbo
    • (voice)
    Michael Graham Cox
    Michael Graham Cox
    • Boromir
    • (voice)
    • (as Michael Graham-Cox)
    Anthony Daniels
    Anthony Daniels
    • Legolas
    • (voice)
    David Buck
    David Buck
    • Gimli
    • (voice)
    Peter Woodthorpe
    Peter Woodthorpe
    • Gollum
    • (voice)
    Fraser Kerr
    • Saruman
    • (voice)
    Philip Stone
    Philip Stone
    • Theoden
    • (voice)
    Michael Deacon
    • Wormtongue
    • (voice)
    André Morell
    André Morell
    • Elrond
    • (voice)
    • (as Andre Morell)
    Alan Tilvern
    Alan Tilvern
    • Innkeeper
    • (voice)
    Annette Crosbie
    Annette Crosbie
    • Galadriel
    • (voice)
    John Westbrook
    • Treebeard
    • (voice)
    • Director
      • Ralph Bakshi
    • Writers
      • Chris Conkling
      • Peter S. Beagle
      • J.R.R. Tolkien
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews371

    6.237.9K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    7Aylmer

    Severe, Psychotronic 70's Cinema

    As a kid I was quite astonished with the dark and gloomy tone of this film, especially in comparison to Rankin/Bass's take on the same material around the same period. Also at the time I didn't really care for the animation, which I found to be rather cold and creepy (having no idea it was rotoscoped or even what rotoscoping was). However as the years have gone by and the Jackson adaptations come and gone, I feel more and more drawn to this rare piece of absolutism as I would a painting by Vincent Van Gogh or Salvadore Dali.

    Bakshi always had a flair for adult-oriented animation, and finally with this he found a subject befitting of his style. Lord of the Rings is some overall dark, intriguing material in comparison with The Hobbit and really was deserving of something imaginative and stylistic as only Bakshi's team could deliver. Most everything comes together quite well here with the bizarre rotoscoped animation, the characterizations, the voice performances, and Leonard Rosenman's supercharged score (one of his career best, up there and quite similar to his work on THE CAR and RACE WITH THE DEVIL). It's rather unfortunate that funding ran out and the project had to be hurriedly wrapped, quite a similar heartbreaking story as to what happened with his previous year's WIZARDS.

    The film is clearly unfinished in many regards. The most heinous act it commits is to end right in the middle of a major action scene with absolutely no resolution to speak of! Even ignoring its abbreviation of the books, one has to admit that narratively this film is a complete disaster. I can't imagine the marketing for this movie honestly claiming it to only be the first half of the book trilogy brought to screen. Needless to say I'd be surprised if angry audiences didn't get up and boo at the screen en masse back in 1978 witnessing perhaps the biggest cheat or, dare I say even, "rip off" in cinematic history.

    Similarly this film has a very rough feel to it in terms of animation and pacing and is entirely inconsistent. Things begin fairly polished and kid-friendly but get darker, drearier, more violent (with some surprisingly graphic gore), and sloppier as the film goes on. By the end we get the vast majority of the film not even properly animated and more or less just treated film material with undercranked smoke and clouds filling in the for the background plates. It's quite similar to the bizarre psychedelic cost saving measures Bakshi made when he took over the second season of the animated 60's "Spiderman" cartoons. This whole Joseph Conradian experience of a descent into hell is pretty overwhelming, oppressive, and possibly even emotionally scarring for young viewers, but it's something I've strangely come to love about this film over time.

    Yes, dare I say it, I just love this movie. You can't deny that it has its share of magical moments like Frodo's escape from the Wraiths, Gandalf opening the doors to Moria, and the showdown with the Balrog. Much like David Lynch's DUNE it created a vivid, creative, and whole-hearted realization of a world out of the severe butchery its source material. There's a small, artistic, and very personal loving feel given to this movie which I found lacking in Jackson's trilogy. Bakshi and his overworked team of animators may not have created the best film ever, but they did a lot with the little they had. I just wish they'd been able to see it through.
    6SnoopyStyle

    fascinating but limited

    It's J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings books 'The Fellowship of the Rings' and 'The Two Towers'. Hobbit Frodo Baggins must guard the one most powerful ring against powerful dark forces with the help of Gandalf, Samwise and others.

    Ralph Bakshi directed Wizard. Using the same rotoscoping of live-action footage, it has that fascinating 70s animation style. It's actually very effective for the material especially since the needed special effects haven't been perfected yet. The style is definitely a very interesting vision and gives an adult sensibility in the animation. However there are limitations with the compressed nature of the film and it also doesn't help that this movie never got the needed sequel. It ends in an unsatisfying cliffhanger. It's a fascinating cinematic oddity but not much more.
    7jvowles-2

    Underrated adaptation

    As an animated film from 1978, this is pretty good--generally well above the standard of the days when Disney hadn't done anything good in years (and Tolkien cared little for Disney anyway). It gets major points for innovative and careful camera work, applying cinematic techniques with relative success. The much-maligned rotoscoping actually works pretty well, especially with the Ringwraiths, and the opening narration. However, it is so drastically overused--possibly as a money-saving technique--that it detracts from the overall effect. The same technique that makes wraiths spooky and otherworldly doesn't fare so well in the Prancing Pony.

    As for the adaptation of the story, it's actually quite good. We lose little bits here and there, minor details such as the Old Forest and Tom Bombadil, the Gaffer and the Sackville-Bagginses. We compress a few characters, such as revising Legolas as one of Elrond's household and an old friend of Aragorn's, but that's a rather wise decision for film. In books you have room to include the references to the larger world of the Elves and Middle-Earth's vast history. In film, you trade that for visuals and sound that convey the same elements in a different way. Nothing critical is truly lost here, and although I have minor quibbles about some of the changes, I'm generally pretty happy with it.

    If only the dratted writers had managed to remember Saruman's name--he's frequently referred to as Aruman, a decision probably made to make him more distinct from similarly-named Sauron; it took me a second viewing before I was certain I hadn't misheard it. It's also annoying that Boromir is a bloody stage viking, and irritable from the start. However, Gandalf is excellent, and most of the rest of the voicework is excellent. If only John Hurt weren't too old to play Aragorn; I love his voice.

    Of course, with the film ending at the midpoint of the story, there's a vast disappointment built in. What makes it far, far worse is the altogether miserable job done by the Rankin & Bass crew on the sequel. That they were permitted to do Return of the King after butchering The Hobbit remains a huge mystery; they seem more interested in bad songs than in proper storytelling. For all its faults, this film's heart is solidly in place and it tries very hard to accomplish a nearly impossible task. I can only hope that the upcoming series of films keeps as true to its vision...
    8cdunbar-3

    Uniquely animated drama & characters true to source

    I'm fond of this film and it vexes me that so many "reviewers" rank it below the Peter Jackson trilogy. A filmed novel is always interpretive; in particular an animated film relies on the artist's vision and should be judged on its own terms. Speaking as a purist, this is a finer homage to Tolkien than the updated version. While this film has its flaws it stays truer to the source, especially so far as the characters are concerned.

    In the Jackson version Tolkien's Frodo is barely recognizable: from the first scenes he is portrayed as a weakling, constantly wavering, manipulated by forces around him and never standing on his own two feet (this is physically and metaphorically true.) You wonder why fate chose this limp biscuit to carry the one ring to the Cracks of Doom. Jackson unforgivably rewrites Tolkien and robs Frodo of his finest moment when he allows Arwen to rescue him from the Ringwraiths...Bakshi's version respects the original, presenting a Frodo who demands the wraiths "Go back and trouble me no more!" Bakshi sustains Frodo's character as Tolkien conceived it. We see his decline as the weight of his burden increases. Frodo is so pivotal to Lord of the Rings you wonder why Jackson took such liberties (he does so with numerous characters)since character development propels the plot to its inevitable conclusion. Bakshi's film better explores the companionship between Legolas and Gimli in a few judicious scenes that are completely lacking in Jackson's version. Similarly we see Boromir horsing with Pippin and Merry, furthering the idea of fellowship. For my liking the camaraderie is more developed in the animated version than the live action.

    Tolkien's poetry is an important ingredient in the novels and Bakshi makes tribute to this in one of my favorite scenes: when Frodo sings the "Merry Old Inn" song, minutes before stumbling into Strider. The cheery tune is chillingly juxtaposed with the darker theme music when seconds later, invisible to his friends but visible to the wraiths, Frodo is dangerously exposed. This is one of the most atmospheric portions of the film and chills me whenever I see it.

    The well documented budget/time restrictions limit this film's final impact but had it been completed it may have resonated with more viewers. As it is, it's worth a look. Even its detractors admit that Peter Jackson derived much of his inspiration from this prototype.
    7barnabyrudge

    Animated version of The Lord Of The Rings - quite good, but suffers because too many unfairly compare it to the new Peter Jackson version.

    More than twenty years before Peter Jackson's visionary adaptation of The Lord Of The Rings, there was this 1978 animated effort from director Ralph Bakshi. An ambitious and reasonably faithful version of the story, this has sadly been rather over-shadowed by the Jackson trilogy. Indeed, many reviewers here on the IMDb (mainly those who saw the newer version first) seem to be fiercely unkind to this version.... but if one applies a little common sense, and takes into consideration the time when it was made and the technical possibilities that existed at that time, then they will realise that this is a pretty good film. Indeed, it was shortly after seeing this animated movie back in the early '80s that I sought out Tolkien's book and immediately became a lifelong fan of these richly detailed Middle Earth adventures. So, in some respects, I owe this film a degree of acknowledgement as the film which shaped my literary tastes forever.

    Sauron, the Dark Lord of Middle Earth, forges an all-powerful ring that gives him incredible power. Following a great battle during which Sauron is defeated, the ring falls into possession of a king named Isildur…. but instead of destroying it he foolishly chooses to keep it. For centuries the ring passes from hand to hand, eventually coming into the possession of a hobbit named Frodo Baggins who lives in a peace-loving community known as The Shire. Frodo learns from a wizard named Gandalf that his ring is in fact The One Ring, the very same that was forged by Sauron all those centuries ago, and that its master is once again searching for it in order to restore his dark power over the entire land. Frodo embarks on a perilous journey to protect the ring with three other hobbit companions, but every step of the way they are hunted by Sauron's ring-wraiths, the Black Riders. There follow many adventures, during which a company of nine adventurers is formed to guide the ring to the only place where it can be "unmade" – Mount Doom, in the land of Mordor. The film concludes with Frodo and his best friend Sam on the borders of Mordor, closing ever nearer to their horrifying destination. Meanwhile Gandalf and the other members of the company fight off a huge army of orcs at the legendary fortress of Helm's Deep.

    This version covers just over half of the original book. A second instalment was planned to bring the story to an end, but was sadly never completed. While the ending feels abrupt, it does at least end at a sensible point in the story. One has to feel a little frustration and regret that no sequel exists in which we might follow these animated heroes to their eventual goal. The animation is passable, with a nice variety of locales and characters presented in interesting detail. The music by Leonard Rosenman is suitably stirring and fits in appropriately with the epic narrative. The voice-overs are decent, too, especially John Hurt as Aragorn and Peter Woodthorpe as Gollum. On the other hand, Michael Scholes - who provides the voice for Sam - is rather campy and goofy, which is not well suited to the character. The Lord Of The Rings is a commendable attempt to visualise the staggering book on which it is based.

    More like this

    Wizards
    6.3
    Wizards
    Fire and Ice
    6.5
    Fire and Ice
    Fritz the Cat
    6.2
    Fritz the Cat
    The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim
    6.3
    The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim
    Sagan om ringen
    4.2
    Sagan om ringen
    Heavy Metal
    6.6
    Heavy Metal
    The Fellowship of the Ring
    3.5
    The Fellowship of the Ring
    The Hobbit
    4.3
    The Hobbit
    The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring - Special Extended Edition Scenes
    9.5
    The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring - Special Extended Edition Scenes
    The Hunt for Gollum
    6.7
    The Hunt for Gollum
    Coonskin
    6.4
    Coonskin
    American Pop
    7.2
    American Pop

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Tim Burton was incorrectly identified as an animator on this movie. However, Ralph Bakshi clarified that Burton only cleaned the dust off animation cels and did not animate any sequences in the film.
    • Goofs
      The name of the wizard of Isengard fluctuates between "Saruman" and "Aruman" throughout the movie.
    • Quotes

      [after Gandalf opens the door to Moria]

      Legolas: So all you had to do was say friend... and enter.

      Gilmi: Those were happier times...

    • Alternate versions
      The version screened on British TV in the 1980s contains more music than the recently-released VHS and DVD version.
    • Connections
      Edited from Alexander Nevsky (1938)
    • Soundtracks
      MITHRANDIR
      Music by Leonard Rosenman

      Words by Mark Fleischer

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ22

    • How long is The Lord of the Rings?Powered by Alexa
    • Why does the film only cover half of the story?
    • Why wasn't it indicated that this would be the first part of the story?
    • Who is Aruman?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • November 15, 1978 (United States)
    • Countries of origin
      • United States
      • United Kingdom
    • Official site
      • RalphBakshi.com
    • Languages
      • English
      • Sindarin
    • Also known as
      • El señor de los anillos
    • Filming locations
      • Belmonte, Cuenca, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain(Exterior)
    • Production companies
      • Fantasy Films
      • Bakshi Productions
      • Saul Zaentz Film Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $4,000,000 (estimated)
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $30,471,420
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $626,649
      • Nov 19, 1978
    • Gross worldwide
      • $30,477,175
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      2 hours 12 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • 70 mm 6-Track
      • Dolby Stereo
      • Stereo
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.78 : 1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    The Lord of the Rings (1978)
    Top Gap
    By what name was The Lord of the Rings (1978) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.