5.9/10
167
10 user 6 critic

Frankenstein: Part 1 

A scientist obsessed with creating life steals body parts to put together his "creation."

Director:

Glenn Jordan

Writers:

Sam Hall (adaptation), Dan Curtis (adaptation) | 2 more credits »
Reviews

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
Robert Foxworth ... Dr. Victor Frankenstein
Susan Strasberg ... Elizabeth Lavenza
Bo Svenson ... Monster
Heidi Vaughn ... Agatha DeLacey
Philip Bourneuf ... Alphonse Frankenstein
Robert Gentry ... Henri Clerval
Jon Lormer ... Charles DeLacey
William Hansen William Hansen ... Professor Waldman
John Karlen ... Otto Roget
George Morgan George Morgan ... Hugo
Brian Avery ... Felix Delacey
Willie Aames ... William Frankenstein
Rosella Olsen Rosella Olsen ... Bride of the Monster
Edgar Daniels Edgar Daniels ... Innkeeper
Edgar Justice Edgar Justice ... Mayor
Edit

Storyline

A scientist obsessed with creating life steals body parts to put together his "creation."

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Edit

Details

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

16 January 1973 (USA) See more »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Dan Curtis Productions See more »
Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Mono

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

On the DVD commentary Robert Foxworth reveals this movie may have been the last production filmed on the old MGM backlot before it was demolished. See more »

Connections

Version of Fuckenstein (2012) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A very sad tale--much closer to the original story than the Karloff version
20 February 2006 | by MartinHaferSee all my reviews

While I am a firm believer that there will NEVER be a version of Frankentein that is as good as the book, this is at least a step in the right direction. While I would rate the Karloff version higher simply because of its technical merits and ability to scare you, this made for TV version is superior in many ways. Unlike earlier versions, this one really centers on the creature and its unfortunate existence. Like the book, the focus is on the "monster" after it is soon abandoned by its maker and the life the creature creates for itself shows great humanity and depth. In fact, in this way, the movie is terribly sad and heart-wrenching. Let me give a couple of examples. First, soon after the creature is created, Frankenstein's assistant plays with him. The monster, unaware of his immense strength, crushes the poor assistant to death. When Frankenstein returns to find this, the creature is saying "Otto, play" over and over again because he has no idea what he's done. Second, after running away, the creature hides out in a pantry--living among the bags of potatoes. He is so lonely for human contact that he delights in listening to the family talk and interact--knowing he cannot reveal his ugly self to them. In fact, he is so miserable, that he creates a little pretend man out of a potato and talks to it out of desperation. How pathetic! This film chooses to focus on the creature and portray him like a toddler sent out to live alone. On this level it is very successful.

UPDATE--I just saw this film again (11/09) and noticed even more than before that Bo Svenson's performance made this film. The rest of the cast (with the exception of the inn keeper) were all good, but Svenson humanized the monster in a way that no other act has done. His performance elicits far more pathos and connection with the audience than even the original great novel. A wonderful performance that more than makes up for the lower budget and changes to the story necessitated by the budgetary constraints (especially towards the end of the film). Well worth watching and better than the Karloff version in many ways.

Also, there is another 1973 made for TV Frankenstein film, FRANKENSTEIN: THE TRUE STORY. While well made in many ways, it's not nearly as good as this film and is too histrionic and deviates too far from the Shelley novel (despite the title). It's worth seeing, but Michael Sarrazin's monster is a far cry from Svenson's.


7 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 10 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed