Three Resurrected Drunkards (1968) User Reviews

We're all the same

[fearnotofman · 7/10 · 30 April 2012]

DICK STEEL posted that during the mock interview segment, "we realized who outnumbers who – the result which has to be taken with a pinch of salt." I think he missed the point of that segment. The point was not that Koreans outnumbered Japanese in Japan; it was that Japanese ARE Koreans! Oshima makes this same point (in a more direct manner) in Sing a Song of Sex. Japanese are descended from Koreans, and therefore they are the same people and discriminating against Koreans is discriminating against your own people ("Koreans don't kill other Koreans").

Tackling racism on film is a tricky thing. It can often sound too didactic and preachy, as in Crash or even Oshima's own Sing a Song of Sex. But Oshima found the right balance with Three Resurrected Drunkards.

I also wanted to add that I, too, checked to see if the DVD had somehow restarted at the halfway mark!

A Nutshell Review: Sinner in Paradise

[DICK STEEL · 5/10 · 22 August 2010]

And the lineup of films that appeals to an acquired taste continues, so far with Diary of a Shinjuku Thief, Shohei Imamura's A Man Vanishes, and now Nagisa Oshima's Stranger in Paradise. While it's aimed to tackle themes like racism which seemed to be shunned at the time, there's a pretty good mix of humour that takes the mickey out of a number of events, and really requires some patience as well because everything seemed to have turned over its head and started afresh at the mid way mark, so don't be looking to walk out of the screening hall, or eject that DVD just yet.

Stranger in Paradise opens in a bizarre fashion, where three students (Kazuhiko Kato, Osamu Kitayama, Norihiko Hashida) strip down to their underwear at a beach and monkey around as if after watching Bloody Thirst and got inspired by the character's iconic image of having a gun pointed at his head. Eventually they do hit the sea proper, and a hand emerges from under the sand to swap two out of three of their clothings. All this played out over a very kitsch song that seems like chipmunks on steroids. It turns out that two Korean soldiers (Kei Sato and Cha Dei-Dang) had AWOL from Korea and found themselves wanting a new life in Japan, and with the Japanese authorities hot on their trail to repatriate them back, they need to find some scapegoats to pose as them, hence the sitting duck students.

In a jiffy we see the three students get sent to Pusan, then to jail, then to an American camp in Vietnam, then dying out there at the warfront. Only that this happens in so comedic a fashion that you'll begin to question the legitimacy of it all the moment it begins. The film consists of countless of surreal moments such as this one, including one involving life and death, repetition in a cycle, and as mentioned, having everything repeat itself almost all over again, though the second time round it marked some attitude changes, where the students take their knowledge of what's to come, and goes along with the game from the onset. Other surreal moments will involve character motivation and design changes especially that of a husband and wife team, and an interview segment out of the blue where (I believe it's staged) people on the street are asked their nationality, and we realized who outnumbers who – the result which has to be taken with a pinch of salt.

Somehow there are a few common threads, ideas and elements that run through the films so far. For starters, the music – they're all infectious and take some time to get out of your head, and then there's the shared dream landscapes the characters often find themselves in, like that in Sing a Song of Sex, and now Sinner in Paradise, where they seem to "wake up" from time to time yet unable to find themselves in what is deemed to be reality. I'm not even sure if there is one in the film to begin with, and wonder if paradise the title alludes to, is just that – a place without a proper beginning, or end.

Perhaps one of the key pointed moments that address the issue of racism head on involve the Korean soldiers being terribly insistent that the Japanese students wear the former's military clothing. In the midst of a policeman, the Japanese students, through a series of questions, realize that the authorities simply have no idea what the soldiers looked like, and are only following orders to look for anyone wearing those recognizable togs. It's quite clear that it alludes to how we are quick to judge others on the basis of appearance and from what we see on the outside, rather than to spend time to look into something more deeper and meaningful than appearances. The ending also saw that realization and reconciliation coming too little too late, and has something it wants to say about the Vietnam war with the use of a recognizable motif. The notion of Koreans not killing Koreans can also suggest a larger picture that we shouldn't be killing ourselves. OK, I think I've gone overboard in desperately trying to spot some meaning in the film.

It will probably take repeat screenings to truly appreciate the ideas that are put forth in an oblique fashion since with each scene comes more things that are curiouser and curiouser. At least it's peppered with comedy that you can laugh at while perplexed at the more stranger things that unfold.

Not for the faint-hearted

[sharptongue · 5/10 · 29 November 2003]

This film is weird. Director Oshima had worked for Jean-Luc Goddard, and is clearly paying homage to the wacky French director here.

"Three Drunkards Come Home", as this film is sometimes called, begins with a surreal situation of three students playing on the beach and having their clothes pinched by Korean (refugees? soldiers?). They are then mistaken for Koreans and begin to play the roles themselves. Then the story starts again at the halfway point, continues for at least five minutes the same way, and gradually diverges.

You need to be a serious film fan to take this sort of stuff. If you aren't a fan of Oshima or Goddard, don't go anywhere near this film. If you are, then you have some idea of what to expect.

As a fan of Oshima but not of Goddard, I sat through this film with mixed feelings. As in Death By Hanging, Oshima makes some strong points about the Japanese discrimination against Koreans. But as its apparently main purpose and theme, I feel this was handled much better in Death By Hanging, and I consider Three Drunkards Come Home to be one of his weaker efforts.

An 'A' for effort but a 'D' for the execution.

[planktonrules · 3/10 · 2 May 2011]

The Folk Crusaders were a Japanese pop music group from the 1960s and are cast as the three leading men in this film that is somewhat reminiscent of a Japanese version of a Beatles movie...somewhat.

Nagisa Ôshima directs this film and it bears his odd mark, as the movie is VERY surreal throughout. Now I must say that I noticed a couple reviews mentioned Jean-Luc Godard and despite what one said, I could find no evidence that Ôshima ever worked for or with Godard--though his style is very reminiscent of Godard as both represent the New Wave movements in their respective countries.

I liked the basic idea of this film and some story elements were quite compelling. It's just that the style was a bit annoying to me--and I am not a huge fan of the New Wave style of film making, as it often deliberately tried to annoy or confuse the audience. Call me weird, but I prefer a film to make sense and NOT confuse the crap out of me.

The film begins with a funny scene where the three guys go swimming at the beach. Some unseen hand reaches out from under the sand and steals their clothes--leaving Korean clothes and a bit of money in its place. From this point on, the guys learn what it's like to be an illegal alien in a country that doesn't want them. What I did not realize is that Koreans were sneaking in to Japan back then to avoid service in the Vietnam War. VERY FEW Americans ever heard that the South Koreans sent many, many troops to fight in the Vietnam War. And much of the film is intended as an anti-Vietnam War piece. This is pretty tough stuff here but it's handled mostly as comedy.

I could try to describe the rest of the film but frankly it's awfully confusing and some of the other reviews have already done this. What bothered me, though, is that about halfway through the movie, it all started again and was virtually identical--though the three guys seemed to have learned by having played the scenes before and so they are able to make it all end differently the second time. Clever, perhaps, but a chore to have to basically re-watch about 40% of the film! As a result, I just felt the whole thing was over-indulgent. The poignancy was lost as a result and it seems like an opportunity lost.

First of all Godard doesn't have two d's in the middle

[cllrdr-1 · 10/10 · 29 May 2009]

Second of all Oshima never worked for him.

Most important of all this film stars the great Japanese pop group The Folk Crusaders. Imagine The Beatles making an experimental film. it would look something like this.

Oshima is concerned here, as he was in "Death By Hanging" made the same year, with Japanese anti-Korean prejudice. Socio-political events too complex and multi-faceted to discuss in a forum of this kind are the basis of this film -- which end with the recreation of the most indelible image of the Vietnam war.

The result is a baroque masterpiece that foreshadows Rivette's "Celine and Julie Go Boating."

Pitifully Worthless!

[net_orders · 1/10 · 6 May 2016]

Viewed on DVD. Restoration = ten (10) stars. Director Nagisa Oshima's embarrassing exhibition of incompetence. The film's title is unrelated to the film, and likely picked out of a hat. If there were drunkards involved with this movie, they may have been the on-set Director and script writers (plus the head of production for the releasing studio)! Far from a comedy as claimed in studio press releases, this is a morose version of a what modern viewers would call a "ground-hog-day movie." The film keeps repeating itself, often scene by scene (you may think for a minute your disc player has restarted by itself!), to stretch out what is really a 12-minute short to reach an 80-minute release time. Acting is all over the map and nonsensical, but always hyper energetic with the supposed nationality of characters altering back and forth from scene to scene. (The Director seems to be making a ham-handed political statement that Japanese and North Koreans are interchangeable--wow!) Line readings by the principal characters indicate they realized they are trapped in a movie from which there is no escape (fortunately, disc viewers can always press the eject button on their remotes). Cinematography (wide screen, color) is fine except for prolonged, static beach scenes where lighting seems to fluctuate with the passing of clouds. Score is okay, but the playback speed of the theme song has been altered to produce an irritating "chipmunk" sound (in an attempt to be "Japanese cute"?). Titles are often too long and could benefit from some serious grammatical scrubbing. Recommend you use your remote's eject button early on--things do not improve with further viewing. WILLIAM FLANIGAN, PhD.

Poor

[gbill-74877 · 3/10 · 28 February 2023]

I liked what Nagisa Oshima was trying to do here, which was to condemn Japanese treatment of Korean immigrants and the horrors of the Vietnam war. Unfortunately, how he went about it was too silly for me, starting with the casting of The Folk Crusaders, whose music and antics ala the early Beatles or Monkees were more grating than funny. The series of misadventures they find themselves in are light on both humor and biting political commentary. At one point one says, "It'd be nice if a couple of bodies just fell from the sky," and another replies, "Damn, if only this were Vietnam. There are corpses all over the place there." It's not exactly deep.

The long history between Japan and Korea is complicated to say the least, and I'm sure the skits and absurd tone held meaning for the counterculture in Japan at the time that I can't fully appreciate, but I didn't get the sense that there was a lot of nuance here. About halfway through, the film resets itself and we start seeing the same inane scenes all over again, identically initially, and then gradually diverging. Let's just say, it was painful both times through.

What really made me hate the film, however, was its treatment of the execution of Nguyen Van Lem, a moment caught on film that shocked the world. As that occurred on February 1, 1968 and this film was released March 30, 1968, it gives you an indication for how quickly it was slapped together, and it shows. The film opens with the trio play-acting this execution on a beach, trying to get the aiming of the gun and the facial expression of the victim just right to goofy music, which I thought was in incredibly poor taste. Imagine some other war atrocity from history being made light of in this way; it's mind-boggling. At the end of the film Oshima tries to restore a sense of gravitas by showing a mural of this image repeatedly and equates it to Japanese officials executing Korean immigrants in the process, which was heavy-handed and far too simplistic besides. Overall, just an irritating, tedious film, and I say that despite being aligned to the director's anti-war, anti-xenophobia positions.