5.4/10
1,402
45 user 14 critic

The Alphabet Murders (1965)

Hercule Poirot investigates a series of murders in London in which the victims are killed according to their initials.

Director:

Frank Tashlin

Writers:

David Pursall (screenplay), Jack Seddon (screenplay) | 1 more credit »
Reviews

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Tony Randall ... Hercule Poirot
Anita Ekberg ... Amanda Beatrice Cross
Robert Morley ... Hastings
Maurice Denham ... Japp
Guy Rolfe ... Duncan Doncaster
Sheila Allen Sheila Allen ... Lady Diane
James Villiers ... Franklin
Julian Glover ... Don Fortune
Grazina Frame Grazina Frame ... Betty Barnard
Clive Morton ... 'X'
Cyril Luckham ... Sir Carmichael Clarke
Richard Wattis ... Wolf
David Lodge ... Sergeant
Patrick Newell ... Cracknell
Austin Trevor ... Judson
Edit

Storyline

Belgian detective Hercule Poirot (Tony Randall) investigates a series of murders in London in which the victims are killed according to their initials. The first victim is A.A., the second B.B., and so on. Poirot is assisted in his investigations by Captain Hastings (Robert Morley) and Inspector Japp (Maurice Denham). Written by Mike Hatchett <hatchetts13@webtv.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Put them all together - they spell MURDER! See more »

Genres:

Crime | Mystery | Comedy

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The only movie in which both Hercule Poirot (Tony Randall) and Miss Jane Marple (Dame Margaret Rutherford) appeared. See more »

Goofs

Japp's opening of Betty Barnard's bathroom door makes the wall and mirror shake, revealing it as a studio set. See more »

Quotes

Japp: What kind of a nut is going to harbor a nut whose already killed three times?
See more »

Crazy Credits

Tony Randall emerges from Borehamwood Studios' Stage 4 to introduce the film and acknowledge his own starring credit, first as himself and then in full Poirot make-up and character. See more »


Soundtracks

Amanda
Music by Brian Fahey
Lyric by Norman Newell
Sung by Ray Peterson
See more »

User Reviews

 
Better than some
3 April 2011 | by rye-breadSee all my reviews

The Wikipedia article speaks of the movie makers as going for comedy. I would say this was not the most well-advised decision. I first saw this in high school, when it came to TV a year or so after its release. We were studying Agatha Christie's Hercule Poirot in English class. So I was psyched to see the flick.

It was a moderate disappointment. It looked like they tried to make Poirot slightly buffoonish. It looked like they tried to modernize the flick. It looked like…dare I say it? It looked like camp. Moicy. One of the besetting sins of the 1960's cinematically (I think) was we all were postmodern and pretentious, and time-honored movies and stories were passé. This came off looking like a Rock Hudson / Doris Day flick in a way.

I like Tony Randall. I like Robert Morley. Anita Eckberg ain't too bad. But it isn't classic Poirot. The adaptation of the book to the Brit TV series Agatha Christie's Poirot with David Suchet…that's classic Christie; and classic Poirot.


11 of 16 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 45 user reviews »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
Edit

Details

Country:

UK

Language:

English

Release Date:

17 May 1966 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Amanda See more »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Mono (Westrex Recording System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See full technical specs »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed