Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Return of the Fly

  • 1959
  • Approved
  • 1h 20m
IMDb RATING
5.7/10
5.4K
YOUR RATING
Return of the Fly (1959)
Home Video Trailer from 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
Play trailer1:37
1 Video
53 Photos
DramaFantasyHorrorSci-FiThriller

Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.

  • Director
    • Edward Bernds
  • Writers
    • Edward Bernds
    • George Langelaan
  • Stars
    • Vincent Price
    • Brett Halsey
    • David Frankham
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.7/10
    5.4K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Edward Bernds
    • Writers
      • Edward Bernds
      • George Langelaan
    • Stars
      • Vincent Price
      • Brett Halsey
      • David Frankham
    • 67User reviews
    • 47Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Return of the Fly
    Trailer 1:37
    Return of the Fly

    Photos53

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 45
    View Poster

    Top cast21

    Edit
    Vincent Price
    Vincent Price
    • Francois Delambre
    Brett Halsey
    Brett Halsey
    • Philippe Delambre
    David Frankham
    David Frankham
    • Ronald Holmes, alias Alan Hinds
    John Sutton
    John Sutton
    • Insp. Beecham
    Dan Seymour
    Dan Seymour
    • Max Barthold
    Danielle De Metz
    Danielle De Metz
    • Cecile Bonnard
    Jack Daly
    • Granville (reporter)
    Janine Grandel
    • Mme. Bonnard
    Michael Mark
    Michael Mark
    • Gaston (watchman)
    Richard Flato
    • Sgt. Dubois
    Gregg Martell
    Gregg Martell
    • Cop
    Barry Bernard
    • Lt. MacLish
    Pat O'Hara
    Pat O'Hara
    • Insp. Evans
    Francisco Villalobos
    • Priest
    • (as Francisco Villalobas)
    Joan Cotton
    • Nurse
    Court Shepard
    • Policeman
    • (uncredited)
    Florence Strom
    • Nun
    • (uncredited)
    Rick Turner
    • Policeman
    • (uncredited)
    • Director
      • Edward Bernds
    • Writers
      • Edward Bernds
      • George Langelaan
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews67

    5.75.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    squeezebox

    Enjoyable sequel, not on par with the original

    THE FLY was a fairly classy, atmospheric sci-fi movie with some horror overtones. It was fun and campy, but also somewhat disturbing in its depiction of a man losing his humanity, a theme which was explored more deeply in David Cronenberg's astonishing remake.

    RETURN OF THE FLY is basically a cheap follow-up which is better than it should be. This is mostly due to the always reliable Vincent Price, who returns as the brother of the scientist who became the fly-monster in the original. Here, he desperately tries to sway his nephew from following in his father's footsteps.

    The movie concentrates on the son's attempts to recreate his father's teleportation equipment with a hesitant Price helping out, then shifts gears as his other partner, a British ex-con, is discovered to be attempting to steal the research.

    This leads to a few misadventures with the teleportation machine resulting in a man becoming a human guinea pig (literally), and ultimately the son becoming a fly-monster himself.

    Shot in stark black and white (as opposed to the original's lush Technicolor), RETURN OF THE FLY has a sleazy, grindhouse quality to it. Whereas the original explored the horror of losing one's mind and physical being, this time it's basically just a "monster roaming the countryside" scenario, with any psychological or philisophical aspects thrown out the window in favor of cheap thrills. And while the make-up effects are somewhat improved upon, the ridiculous optical effect of the son's head on a fly's body is unintentionally funny.

    Overall, however, it's entertaining enough, and above average for the B-horror movies of the era, though it may be disappointing for fans of the original.
    8planktonrules

    A worthy follow-up.

    "The Return of the Fly" takes place many years after "The Fly". The dead scientist from the original film had a son, Philippe, and this young man has grown up and has a fixation of finishing his father's experiments...the same one that turned him into two fly/human hybrids. However, what he doesn't know is that his friend and lab assistant, Alan, is evil and plans on stealing the project. Ultimately, Alan deliberately turns Philippe into the hybrids and shoots Philippe's uncle (Vincent Price) as well!! What a jerk-face! Can they manage to find both fly-brids and reintegrate them back to the creatures they once were? And, can Alan be punished for his infamy?

    Rarely would I say this, but this sequel is about equal in quality to the original film. Considering it came out only a year later, this isn't such a huge surprise. It also managed to be creative and original as well as entertaining. Well worth seeing...just like the prior film.
    BaronBl00d

    Entertaining and Enjoyable

    My words for this film are going to be less harsh than others for the simple fact that this film, in no way superior or even comparable to the original, is entertaining. The story has the little boy from the first Fly film, Phillipe, coming back to carry out the work of his father, against the express wishes of Vincent Price, his uncle. The plot is very predictable and the acting is nothing more than adequate(Vinnie notwithstanding). The film is in black and white, and in general very cheaply made. What then does it have going for it? Well, for one it has a nice performance by Vincent Price. Another thing is it has some bizarre scenes and murders, things lacking from the original. The guinea pig scene is reason enough to see the film.
    Brevity

    It's quite hilarious, which, you know, wasn't probably the intention

    While the fly "makeup" is as ridiculous as in the original, it's got nothing on the guinea pig paws. Add in obvious, under-lining music, delayed reactions, a clumsy fly-man, some overacting, action reminiscent of the old "Batman" series, "help me, help me" revisited, some fly-staring, 50s special effects - the "disintegrator-integrator" machine of the old beep-beep type (you can imagine the sounds), not to mention the creatures themselves, is amusing as anything - and some rodent-squelching, and you got yourself laughs aplenty.

    The editing is really messy and ugly; there's much dead air in between, even though the film barely runs for 80 minutes! The camera-work is awkward as well.

    The cliché-filled dialogue is often amusing, intentionally or not, with some of the highlights being the "if I tell you, it'll haunt you for the rest of your life" exchange, the whole bad guy routine and "the murderous brain of the fly". The what?

    I don't think this was done tongue-in-cheek. It's basically the same story as in the original, which makes it seem redundant, but hey, it's mostly entertaining, so I guess that evens it out. Notice how I used the word "mostly".
    6lost-in-limbo

    Following in father's footsteps.

    Phillippe the son of the infamous Dr. Delambre, who still has an air of mystery around his death, is now a young man who has taken over his father's work, which his uncle Francois wants him to forget about. Though he gets conned into backing the experiment and that's only if he can supervise the project, so it doesn't happen again. The experiment is going quite well, up until later on when Phillippe finds out his mischievous assistant has betrayed him, as he's secretly selling the idea of the teleportation device to another backer. So, to stop the word getting out, his assistant provides him with the same fate that his father had fought. Now, it's a race against time for Francois and Inspector Beecham to save Phillippe from the same aftermath of his father.

    Right of the back of the original film, comes a rather quickie of a sequel that doesn't push any limits. Firstly, no way does it come close to the superior original, but as an automatic b-grade monster feature, it's provides enough rollicking fun. Well, when you got Price on show, how can you go wrong? What we get is a bland story structure that lacks an ounce of life and astuteness, though it does have a few inspired moments, but these are far and in between many inferior sequences that come off just plain ordinary with some confusing plot details. The original managed to work around the silly context, but here it tends accept it by working in laughable story turns and monster effects. Even the dialog seems more like schlock, without the savvy and witty dialog that made the first film naturally engaging. The performances are all but cold and lifeless, but with the obvious exception of Vincent Price. He just has a spellbinding presence that when the words roll of his tongue, it has a Shakespearean vibe, no matter how bad the lines were. Price's performance is definitely this film's anchor. The rest of the characters I didn't care for, as they are rather unsympathetic and foolish.

    There was just more attention to fabricating unpleasant and cheap thrills, which are more out of control with a monster out for revenge hook-line. It's more violent than its predecessor too. I give it credit that it's more exciting in its basic dementia of its creation, but hell the treatment of the story and effects were laughable. That's unintentionally, though. This one seems more serious, but it's outlandishly executed in a drab fashion. But ironically everything works out in the long run with a happy ending for all… well for the good guys. Now the effects are decent, but when it came to the fly's head on the human body. Why was it that huge!? It looks stupid! Sure, it looks even more hideous, but you got to be kidding, it was funny watching the guy running along while holding onto it, so it doesn't fall off. You could easily tell the guy was having trouble with it, even so when walking! They really out did themselves on that one.

    Another note was that the pacing is rather brisk, gladly. Also it does provide slight dose of suspense and atmosphere, but more so it's preoccupied in its second-rate chills and mayhem instead. The flick is shot in black and white, and it does look rather sharp and crisp in detail. Plus there's some showy photography and framework that adds a bit more creative eye to the wailing production. The story's actions on this occasion were just too ridiculous to take seriously with it getting more risible the further it goes, but it seems pretty unaware to all of that.

    It's not all that bad, but the quality is replaced by big chunks of camp that's more interested in wowing us with ludicrous action, rather then the strain it has on the characters and their relationships. Still, there's b-grade fun to be had here.

    More like this

    Curse of the Fly
    5.1
    Curse of the Fly
    The Fly
    7.1
    The Fly
    The Fly II
    5.2
    The Fly II
    The Tingler
    6.6
    The Tingler
    The Werewolf
    5.8
    The Werewolf
    Invaders from Mars
    6.2
    Invaders from Mars
    Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome
    6.1
    Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome
    One Body Too Many
    5.4
    One Body Too Many
    Dracula's Daughter
    6.3
    Dracula's Daughter
    The Haunted Strangler
    6.2
    The Haunted Strangler
    House of Wax
    7.0
    House of Wax
    Son of Dracula
    6.1
    Son of Dracula

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Vincent Price signed on for the film after reading the first draft of its script; however, the studio demanded re-writes in order to reduce production costs. The re-writes reportedly removed much of what Price liked about the film's first draft.
    • Goofs
      In the film, when Francois and Philippe visit Andre's laboratory from the previous film The Fly (1958), the messages Andre wrote to Helene on the blackboard can still be seen on it. But at the end of that same film, Helene had told Inspector Charas that she had erased them all off of the blackboard in order to cover up all traces of Andre's experiment.
    • Quotes

      Philippe Delambre: [as a housefly] Cecile! Help me! I'm here on the floor! Cecile! Help me!

    • Alternate versions
      For UK cinemas, the BBFC imposed a brief cut to remove the shot of Alan crushing the hybrid guinea pig with his foot. Later video releases were uncut.
    • Connections
      Featured in Creature Features: Return of the Fly (1971)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ19

    • How long is Return of the Fly?Powered by Alexa
    • Is "Return of the Fly" based on a book?
    • How long after "The Fly" ends does "Return of the Fly" take place?
    • Why was this sequel shot in black-and-white when the original was in color?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • July 22, 1959 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Languages
      • English
      • French
    • Also known as
      • El retorno de la mosca
    • Filming locations
      • 20th Century Fox Studios - 10201 Pico Blvd., Century City, Los Angeles, California, USA
    • Production companies
      • Twentieth Century Fox
      • Associated Producers (API)
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $225,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 20 minutes
    • Color
      • Black and White
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.35 : 1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Return of the Fly (1959)
    Top Gap
    By what name was Return of the Fly (1959) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.