When Laura and Dan get married, she's more interested in Dan's gorilla. It's revealed through hypnosis that she was Queen of the Gorillas in a previous incarnation.When Laura and Dan get married, she's more interested in Dan's gorilla. It's revealed through hypnosis that she was Queen of the Gorillas in a previous incarnation.When Laura and Dan get married, she's more interested in Dan's gorilla. It's revealed through hypnosis that she was Queen of the Gorillas in a previous incarnation.
Trustin Howard
- Soldier
- (as Slick Slavin)
Eve Brent
- Stewardess
- (as Jean Ann Lewis)
Steve Calvert
- Gorilla
- (uncredited)
Ray Corrigan
- Spanky (the wife-stealing gorilla)
- (uncredited)
Bobby Small
- Gorilla
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe original working title was Queen of the Gorillas.
- GoofsWhen Spanky the gorilla bumps into the stone wall, it wobbles.
- ConnectionsEdited from Man-Eater of Kumaon (1948)
Featured review
OK, don't laugh...I recommend this film to future actresses, directors and just plain viewers that want a good (unusual) time.
Bottom line, the movie is a stinker, like so many things Ed Wood was connected with in his life. The whole middle of the film uses terrible stock footage that has little to do with the rest of the film. Fully 30-45 minutes of the middle of the film could have been left out.
So, let's discuss the first 15-20 minutes and the last 10 minutes of the film--without giving away too much.
First of all, one thing different about this film from most Ed Wood films is that the two leads are real actors. Lance Fuller had done many movies with big names and Charlotte Austin had small roles in films such as "How to Marry a Millionaire" where she rubbed shoulders with the likes of Monroe, Bacall and Grable. And--looks-wise--Austin held her own. She was a very sophisticated and attractive looking girl.
But what makes this whole film work--for 25 minutes or so--is the fact that Austin plays the part straight. You really believe this beautiful, elegant model has a thing for gorillas.
The part that every budding actress or director should really see, though, is Austin's close-up, facials as she looks with growing lust at 'the beast.'
I'm a film buff myself, but I have NEVER seen any actress be able to convey so much with a few close ups as this woman did in the short sequence of her first gaze on the ape.
I know, I know...it sounds crazy, but you have to view it. Nothing in erotic films--for all the modern explicitness--touches what this film actress does with a few close ups.
It's a shame Miss Austin left movies shortly thereafter...she certainly had the looks and ability to have gone places in movies.
Check it out and see if you agree!
Bottom line, the movie is a stinker, like so many things Ed Wood was connected with in his life. The whole middle of the film uses terrible stock footage that has little to do with the rest of the film. Fully 30-45 minutes of the middle of the film could have been left out.
So, let's discuss the first 15-20 minutes and the last 10 minutes of the film--without giving away too much.
First of all, one thing different about this film from most Ed Wood films is that the two leads are real actors. Lance Fuller had done many movies with big names and Charlotte Austin had small roles in films such as "How to Marry a Millionaire" where she rubbed shoulders with the likes of Monroe, Bacall and Grable. And--looks-wise--Austin held her own. She was a very sophisticated and attractive looking girl.
But what makes this whole film work--for 25 minutes or so--is the fact that Austin plays the part straight. You really believe this beautiful, elegant model has a thing for gorillas.
The part that every budding actress or director should really see, though, is Austin's close-up, facials as she looks with growing lust at 'the beast.'
I'm a film buff myself, but I have NEVER seen any actress be able to convey so much with a few close ups as this woman did in the short sequence of her first gaze on the ape.
I know, I know...it sounds crazy, but you have to view it. Nothing in erotic films--for all the modern explicitness--touches what this film actress does with a few close ups.
It's a shame Miss Austin left movies shortly thereafter...she certainly had the looks and ability to have gone places in movies.
Check it out and see if you agree!
- bwilson0050
- Aug 25, 2004
- Permalink
- How long is The Bride and the Beast?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Queen of the Gorillas
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 18 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Bride and the Beast (1958) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer