7.2/10
12,654
69 user 44 critic

Animal Farm (1954)

Approved | | Animation, Drama | 13 February 1956 (Sweden)
A successful farmyard revolution by the resident animals vs. the farmer goes horribly wrong as the victors create a new tyranny among themselves.

Writers:

George Orwell (based on a story by), Lothar Wolff (story development) | 4 more credits »
Reviews

On Disc

at Amazon

Nominated for 1 BAFTA Film Award. See more awards »

Photos

Learn more

More Like This 

Drama | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

In a totalitarian future society, a man, whose daily work is re-writing history, tries to rebel by falling in love.

Director: Michael Radford
Stars: John Hurt, Richard Burton, Suzanna Hamilton
Animation | Adventure | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

A group of rabbits flee their doomed warren and face many dangers to find and protect their new home.

Director: Martin Rosen
Stars: John Hurt, Richard Briers, Ralph Richardson
Animation | Adventure | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

Two dogs escape from a laboratory and are hunted as possible carriers of the bubonic plague.

Director: Martin Rosen
Stars: John Hurt, Christopher Benjamin, James Bolam
Animal Farm (TV Movie 2007)
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  
Director: Jeremy Turner
Stars: Olivia Judson, Giles Coren, Julian Wadham
Drama

Based on the novel of the same name, by George Orwell, this movie represents communist Russia and the U.S.S.R. through animals on a farm. After running the owners out of their farm, the ... See full summary »

Director: Andy Serkis
Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Maurice Denham Maurice Denham ... All Animals (voice)
Edit

Storyline

Britain's second animated feature, which, despite the title and Disney-esque animal animation, is in fact a no-holds-barred adaptation of George Orwell's classic satire on Stalinism, with the animals taking over their farm by means of a revolutionary coup, but then discovering that although all animals are supposed to be equal, some are more equal than others... Written by Michael Brooke <michael@everyman.demon.co.uk>

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

He's got the world in an UPROAR! See more »

Genres:

Animation | Drama

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Official site [Japan]

Country:

UK | USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

13 February 1956 (Sweden) See more »

Also Known As:

Animal Farm - Aufstand der Tiere See more »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Mono (RCA Sound System)

Color:

Color (Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

To make the film, Halas-Batchelor's company was expanded to make it the largest animation unit in Western Europe. See more »

Goofs

When Old Jones grabs the dynamite out of the box, he has three sticks in each hand, but when he puts his hands together a seventh stick appears from nowhere. Then, when he lights the fuse, there are twelve sticks in the pile. See more »

Quotes

Napoleon: Loyal followers, on farms owned and operated by pigs, there is order and discipline. Own lower animals do more work and eat less than other on farms.
[gives medals]
Napoleon: With this, we encourage you to make your lower animals work even harder and eat even less! To a greater Animal Farm! For peace and plenty under pig rule!
[Benjamin, outside imagines Napoleon's face assimilating that of Jones; he suddenly sees through the resemblance]
Napoleon: To the day when pigs own and operate farms EVERYWHERE!
[applause]
See more »

Connections

Version of Animal Farm (1999) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A good story of course and thus worth seeing but the narration-heavy delivery makes it more like an audio book than a film
2 April 2006 | by bob the mooSee all my reviews

Fed up with the treatment from farmer Jones, the animals of Manor Farm gather in a meeting to listen to Old Major tell them of his hopes for a socialist revolution to improve their lives. Sadly, mid-song, Old Major dies of a heart attack but by then his message had been passed on. The next morning Jones is met with resistance and driven off his own land and, when he returns with friends to take it back, a great battle ensues that the animals win. Thus begins the new, fairer farm where all animals are equal and everyone shares the work as well as having a share of the profits. However this equality soon starts to have exceptions as leaders rise up from within the ranks.

There is no doubting the value of the story or the intelligence of the source material and the decision of the film to stick closely to Orwell's book is where its strength comes from. I love the story and always have, it is well written, sharply judgemental and a cautionary tale that is rightly used heavily in schools. The socialist system rises up but soon some want more rights than others and soon the leaders of the rebellion start emulating the habits of Jones and the, once proud standards are gradually watered down. The broad characters are well written and, although they don't have any depth, they fulfil the requirements of the story telling.

The animation looks dated but given that it is now over 50 years old this is no real surprise, nor a problem. No, the problem with the film is the delivery. Heath is the narrator while Denham does the voices of all the animals; now this sounds like Denham will be carrying the majority of the film but in reality he has little to do because the film is mostly delivered in narration. This is all well and good but it does make the film feel like it is more an audio book with pictures rather than a film. As a result there isn't the emotional impact that there should have been and, although you feel sorry for the characters it is more a general feeling rather than a genuine care for the "people".

Many reviewers have commented on the ending and they are right to do so because if even an ending felt tacked on to produce a "happy" conclusion then it was this one. I understand that no producer wants to try and sell a negative product but the end of the book was fine as it was – it made a firm point and left a memorable impression whereas this one just feels wrong. Overall though it is a good film that is worth seeing due to the source material but the narrative approach lessens its value as a film and made me think that I should have just reread the book.


19 of 21 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 69 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed