IMDb RATING
6.7/10
2.2K
YOUR RATING
A film director tries to create the best film in history, but finds out that human abilities have their limits.A film director tries to create the best film in history, but finds out that human abilities have their limits.A film director tries to create the best film in history, but finds out that human abilities have their limits.
Birgit Lindkvist
- Anna
- (as Bibi Lindkvist)
John W. Björling
- Man in Birgitta's Dream
- (uncredited)
Sven Björling
- Filmworker at Film Studio
- (uncredited)
Anita Blom
- Anna
- (uncredited)
Britta Brunius
- Lasse's Mother
- (uncredited)
Åke Engfeldt
- Police Officer
- (uncredited)
Gösta Ericsson
- Police Officer
- (uncredited)
Kenne Fant
- Arne
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
An ex Maths teacher announces he's just been released from a lunatic asylum (as you do) to some people making a film. (He used to teach one of them). He says that he has ideas about the Devil. The filmmakers try to adapt those ideas into a screenplay. Apparently they reject those ideas -after making them - for this film presumably.
The meandering narrative seems to explore scenarios that surround some pretty miserable and uninteresting people. I think I read that it's Bergman's first film to look solely at mild horror and the place of the Devil, both in philosophy, film and in folklore. Suicide, alcoholism, prostitution, even drowning babies born to the under-aged get limp, clumsy and unconvincing treatment.
It's pretty impossible to follow and no doubt spoilt by knowing what gems came later from the Master of Darkness.
Best thing to come out of it was a line that I've slightly altered - "Life Itself is a terminal illness "
The meandering narrative seems to explore scenarios that surround some pretty miserable and uninteresting people. I think I read that it's Bergman's first film to look solely at mild horror and the place of the Devil, both in philosophy, film and in folklore. Suicide, alcoholism, prostitution, even drowning babies born to the under-aged get limp, clumsy and unconvincing treatment.
It's pretty impossible to follow and no doubt spoilt by knowing what gems came later from the Master of Darkness.
Best thing to come out of it was a line that I've slightly altered - "Life Itself is a terminal illness "
Minor, depressing early Ingmar Bergman drama, bulit on an ambitious life-mirrors-art concept that doesn't really come off. It begins with the premise of a director being pitched the idea of making a film that depicts "Hell on Earth", but then the movie seems to try to prove this thesis via the story of some people involved in the filmmaking process. There is one notable extended dream sequence, but the most original touch is probably the spoken opening credits that never actually appear on the screen. It's a well-made and well-acted film, but one recommended mostly for dedicated Bergman followers. ** out of 4.
I am a big Begman fan, and in recent times I've gone back to some of the early films - initially just because I thought it might be interesting to see the "juvenilia", but gradually I realised that so many of them are wonderful. I've now seen Prison 4 times, and each time I am stunned by how moving and visually powerful it is. And the performance by Doris Svedlund is breath-taking. Is it the most polished film? Who cares!
Bergman did many dream sequences in films (e.g. Wild Strawberries, Face to Face) - really hard to make them un-cringey - but the one in Prison is about as good as it gets.
So wonderful artistically, and very moving in terms of human interest. There is an orthodoxy about peoples "great" films which often gets in the way of just seeing what is there - please do watch great Bergman film .. I hope you won't be disappointed!
Bergman did many dream sequences in films (e.g. Wild Strawberries, Face to Face) - really hard to make them un-cringey - but the one in Prison is about as good as it gets.
So wonderful artistically, and very moving in terms of human interest. There is an orthodoxy about peoples "great" films which often gets in the way of just seeing what is there - please do watch great Bergman film .. I hope you won't be disappointed!
Bergman Collection 20 All Reached
Bergman's first scripted film at the helm, and I didn't expect it to be that good in comparison to his entire career. It's a shame that the CC compilation didn't choose to include this Bergman film, with a hint of that New Wave flavor from Monica the Delinquent. Opened the movie on b-site with the anticipation of the Mask references.
The camera reveal in Godard's Contempt has long been a novelty, and it seems Bergman is still a master of his craft.
Outstanding light shaping, which has become rare in the late Bergman, it is difficult to change the lighting team?
And actually started so early in the discussion of ghosts and gods worthy of Bergman, this step should be counted into the faith trilogy.
BIBI's awful big eyes almost ruined the movie, but I still appreciate her excellent interpretation of the surreal moments that Bergman gave her life. Those big eyes seem to sparkle as if they simply don't know where to use themselves.
The ending wraps up the theme of ghosts and gods, while the core is a human framework, perfect drama. Seal the deal.
Bergman's first scripted film at the helm, and I didn't expect it to be that good in comparison to his entire career. It's a shame that the CC compilation didn't choose to include this Bergman film, with a hint of that New Wave flavor from Monica the Delinquent. Opened the movie on b-site with the anticipation of the Mask references.
The camera reveal in Godard's Contempt has long been a novelty, and it seems Bergman is still a master of his craft.
Outstanding light shaping, which has become rare in the late Bergman, it is difficult to change the lighting team?
And actually started so early in the discussion of ghosts and gods worthy of Bergman, this step should be counted into the faith trilogy.
BIBI's awful big eyes almost ruined the movie, but I still appreciate her excellent interpretation of the surreal moments that Bergman gave her life. Those big eyes seem to sparkle as if they simply don't know where to use themselves.
The ending wraps up the theme of ghosts and gods, while the core is a human framework, perfect drama. Seal the deal.
Bergman's first film where he wrote his own script, and had real artistic control (in exchange for a tiny budget.).
An aging film professor, just released from a mental asylum, visits an old student, now a successful director, and challenges him to make a film showing that the devil really rules the earth. While dismissive in the moment, the director is haunted by the idea, and a journalist friend suggests the film could take off from his experience interviewing a very young prostitute.
We then enter the prostitute's story, and it's (intentionally) never fully clear if what we're seeing is the film that arose from the concept, or the truth of the girl's life.
Beautifully photographed, and full of inventive touches (the main credits are spoken, not seen, over a long tracking shot of a dark cobblestone street), I was also surprised that it contained more of a dark sense of humor, about itself and the world, then most critics acknowledge. In turn, that keeps the film's occasional youthful over-obsession with despair from ever feeling unbearably sophomoric.
I will admit it lost steam for me in the last third, some of the performers aren't quite up to the heavy burdens of the script, and a few sequences are awkward and bespeak Bergman's comparative youth. But the next morning I found myself haunted by images and moments even if the whole only felt partly successful.
An aging film professor, just released from a mental asylum, visits an old student, now a successful director, and challenges him to make a film showing that the devil really rules the earth. While dismissive in the moment, the director is haunted by the idea, and a journalist friend suggests the film could take off from his experience interviewing a very young prostitute.
We then enter the prostitute's story, and it's (intentionally) never fully clear if what we're seeing is the film that arose from the concept, or the truth of the girl's life.
Beautifully photographed, and full of inventive touches (the main credits are spoken, not seen, over a long tracking shot of a dark cobblestone street), I was also surprised that it contained more of a dark sense of humor, about itself and the world, then most critics acknowledge. In turn, that keeps the film's occasional youthful over-obsession with despair from ever feeling unbearably sophomoric.
I will admit it lost steam for me in the last third, some of the performers aren't quite up to the heavy burdens of the script, and a few sequences are awkward and bespeak Bergman's comparative youth. But the next morning I found myself haunted by images and moments even if the whole only felt partly successful.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaIngmar Bergman's first film based on his own original screenplay.
- Crazy creditsThere are no opening titles in this film. An unseen narrator (Hasse Ekman) reads the credits, as well as the title, out loud approximately ten minutes in to the movie. The sole title card is the standard "Slut" (Swedish for "End") that closes the picture.
- ConnectionsEdited into Histoire(s) du cinéma: Une histoire seule (1989)
- SoundtracksDrömmen
Composed by Erland von Koch (1949)
- How long is Prison?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- SEK 240,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 19 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
