6 user 1 critic

Step Lively, Jeeves! (1937)

Butler Jeeves goes to America duped by mobsters into believing he is the heir to the fortune of Sir Francis Drake.


Eugene Forde


Frank Fenton (screen play), Lynn Root (screen play) | 2 more credits »


Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?



Complete credited cast:
Arthur Treacher ... Jeeves
Patricia Ellis ... Patricia Westley
Robert Kent ... Gerry Townsend
Alan Dinehart ... Hon. Cedric B. Cromwell
George Givot ... Prince Boris Caminov
Helen Flint ... Babe
John Harrington ... Barney Ross
George Cooper ... Slug
Arthur Housman ... Max
Max Wagner ... Joey
Franklin Pangborn ... Gaston


Butler Jeeves goes to America duped by mobsters into believing he is the heir to the fortune of Sir Francis Drake.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

butler | sequel | based on novel | See All (3) »




Did You Know?


As Jeeves and the con men drive along a London street, in the rear projection can be seen the shop windows of a cabinet maker named "Woodhouse and Son." See more »


Follows Thank You, Jeeves! (1936) See more »

User Reviews

Jeeves but without Wooster!
8 December 2010 | by MartinHaferSee all my reviews

This is one of two Jeeves & Wooster films released by Twentieth-Century Fox on a single DVD. However, oddly, this follow-up to "Thank You, Jeeves" does NOT have Wooster--just his manservant, Jeeves! So, while they were unable to get David Niven to return for this film, Arthur Treacher was on hand to reprise his role as the imperturbable butler, Jeeves. As for me, I didn't mind too much, as Treacher was the best character (by far) in the first film--the way Treacher underplayed the guy was terrific.

While I did enjoy this second film, it was a bit of a letdown for two reasons. First, without Wooster there was a problem with the film's chemistry. Instead of a Jeeves & Wooster film, it was much more of a gangster film. Second, while Jeeves was supposedly the star of the film, Treacher seemed to have very little to do in the film other than to make a few appearances here and there. So it's clearly not up to the standards of the first film--though it is still enjoyable if you don't expect a Wodehouse story. Well produced...just not up to the standards you'd expect.

By the way, if you want to know why Wooster was not in this film, try watching the DVD extra "The World of Wodehouse" on the same DVD. It explains this as well as discusses how different the first and second film were.

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 6 user reviews »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more »






Release Date:

1 April 1937 (USA) See more »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Twentieth Century Fox See more »
Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

Mono (RCA High Fidelity Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See full technical specs »

Contribute to This Page

We've Got Your Streaming Picks Covered

Looking for some great streaming picks? Check out some of the IMDb editors' favorites movies and shows to round out your Watchlist.

Recently Viewed