7.6/10
12,739
131 user 70 critic

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)

Passed | | Horror, Sci-Fi | 3 January 1932 (USA)
Dr. Jekyll faces horrible consequences when he lets his dark side run wild with a potion that transforms him into the animalistic Mr. Hyde.

Director:

Rouben Mamoulian

Writers:

Samuel Hoffenstein (screen play), Percy Heath (screen play) | 1 more credit »
Reviews
Won 1 Oscar. Another 3 wins & 2 nominations. See more awards »

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Fredric March ... Dr. Henry Jekyll / Mr. Edward Hyde
Miriam Hopkins ... Ivy Pearson
Rose Hobart ... Muriel Carew
Holmes Herbert ... Dr. John Lanyon
Halliwell Hobbes ... Brig. Gen. Danvers Carew
Edgar Norton ... Poole
Tempe Pigott ... Mrs. Hawkins
Edit

Storyline

Based on the story by Robert Louis Stevenson, Dr. Henry Jekyll believes that there are two distinct sides to men - a good and an evil side. He believes that by separating the two man can become liberated. He succeeds in his experiments with chemicals to accomplish this and transforms into Hyde to commit horrendous crimes. When he discontinues use of the drug it is already too late... Written by Mark J. Popp <mjpopp@cwave.com>

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Before Your Own Eyes A Man Turns Fiend! (print ad - Lubbock Morning Avalanche - Lyric Theatre - Lubbock, Texas - January 30, 1932) See more »

Genres:

Horror | Sci-Fi

Certificate:

Passed | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Miriam Hopkins originally turned down the role of Ivy Pearson, saying she wanted to play Muriel Carew instead. She soon changed her mind when the director informed her many actresses in Hollywood could be cast in her place. See more »

Goofs

Miriam Hopkins's character is listed as Ivy Pierson in the end credits. However in the movie, it is listed as Ivy Pearson in a newspaper article. See more »

Quotes

Dr. Lanyon: I'm afraid you offended the General.
Dr. Jekyll: Offended him! It's a pity I didn't strangle the old walrus!
See more »

Alternate Versions

The infamous Miriam Hopkins nude scene, missing even from the restored Turner Classics version on VHS, is fully restored in the DVD release. This widely censored scene includes a single nude shot, lasting perhaps five seconds, of Miriam Hopkins as Ivy getting into bed during her first meeting with Jekyll. The DVD also restores the film's original Paramount opening logo (previous video release opened with the MGM logo.) See more »

Connections

Referenced in My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic: Luna Eclipsed (2011) See more »

Soundtracks

Ich ruf' zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ in F Minor, BWV 639
(1713) (uncredited)
Music by Johann Sebastian Bach
Played on an organ by Fredric March but probably dubbed
See more »

User Reviews

 
Renewed Sight for the Listening Camera
4 September 2005 | by CineanalystSee all my reviews

As this film demonstrates, director Rouben Mamoulian (Applause (1929)) and cinematographer Karl Struss (Sunrise (1927)) were two of the great innovators in renewing the role of the camera for the talkies. Lesser talents began the talkies much the same as silent films began: with a static camera. The sound is still creaky, as usual, with awkward silences, but it's not bothersome. The editing isn't always seamless here, either, and, at times, makes the film seem unpolished, but that, too, is minor. This is the best version of Robert Louis Stevenson's novella "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde", in my opinion, and that has very little to do with the actual story adaptation, which comes more from the stage, anyhow. It's the role of the camera that's remarkable.

I don't mean to say that this adaptation is of little interest; it's especially interesting when compared to the novella and its other adaptations. The 1920-John Barrymore version features a more grotesque Hyde and a stiffer Jekyll. Here, Jekyll is, at first, full of gaiety and youthful exuberance. That's more faithful to the novel, but also reflects the filmmakers' intentions and the changes in Hollywood. The 1920 film was bolder in content in some respects; it was a mood piece of horror and atmosphere. The fogy lamp-lit slums of London are still realized vividly in this one, but much of the feeling in them is lost. On the other hand, the mirror motif comes out more here, which corresponds nicely with the doppelgänger (or doubles) theme inherent in the story. This 1931 film is of the classic Hollywood era. The added emphasis on the romance between Jekyll and Muriel is a result. This version is about more than the story, though; the major focus is in the camera-work.

The film begins with about three and half minutes of long point-of-view takes, with a mobile camera, from the perspective of Dr. Jekyll. It establishes the camera as an active participant in the film, rather than merely a static recorder. Throughout the picture, the camera continually moves--from slight zooms, dollies, pans and tilts to dance-like tracking shots during the party sequence. Additionally, some extreme close-ups show only a character's eyes. A POV shot during Jekyll's first transition into Hyde turns into spinning memories, which is in addition to the special effects that allow for transformations that are seen with fluent, unbroken rhythm from the camera's eye.

The camera positioning is varied, as well, and some shots are extraordinary just in their positions. The photography exploits the sets to greater effect occasionally, and the filmmakers position props with the camera especially well and in rather thematic ways that apply to the story. Yet, the photography is most brilliant when not subject to much scene dissection: long takes that are unbroken and add more fluency to the already tight plot.

One could say this is showy film-making; even the transitional effects seem to draw attention to themselves: lengthy dissolves that linger as superimposed images (such as the image of Ivy's legs over the image of Jekyll and Dr. Lanyon's debate) and wipes that create brief split-screen shots. But, the camera is the most essential part of film-making (along with editing), and it seems negligent to subject it to a role of impotence--to just recording an enacted play. This 1931 "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" is a cinematic artwork and shows what film should be concerning the role of its most basic apparatus.


47 of 53 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 131 user reviews »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more »
Edit

Details

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

3 January 1932 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde See more »

Edit

Box Office

Budget:

$535,000 (estimated)

Cumulative Worldwide Gross:

$16,615
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Paramount Pictures See more »
Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (TCM print)

Sound Mix:

Mono (Western Electric Noiseless Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.20 : 1
See full technical specs »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed