Welcome Danger (1929) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
29 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Silence is Golden
zsenorsock16 September 2006
There are actually two different versions of this film available. Yes, Lloyd re-shot a lot of his silent footage and released it as a "talkie". But he also released the silent version to the overseas markets and to theaters not yet wired for sound. While the story remains the same, the two versions are quite different in several areas.

I recently had the privilege of seeing the silent version restored by Jere Gulden of the UCLA Film & Television archives with a new score by Robert Israel at the Motion Picture Academy.

I enjoyed it. While not as good as the classic Lloyd films like "Safety Last", "The Freshman" and my personal favorite, "The Kid Brother", it's still pretty good and I think is superior to the sound version, particularly in the use of music. Also, it seems like once Lloyd found sound, sometimes he didn't know when to shut up. There are some nice moments in the sound version, but by 1928 Lloyd really knew what he was doing with silence and I think this version is superior.

Barbara Kent provides a nice, though tiny love interest (her bio says she was only 4'11). The scene in which Lloyd, without knowing she is the girl in the picture, goes on and on how beautiful she is, is heart warming and romantic. It plays so much better in the silence. Kent was brought back for Lloyd's "Feet First".

Just a note: the great Edgar Kennedy only appears in the sound version. He replaces the desk Sargent from the silent movie.

Hopefully they will soon release both versions on one DVD, similar to what they did with the two versions of "The Big Sleep" (war and post war versions).
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Harold Lloyd makes an awkward entrance into talking pictures
AlsExGal24 October 2009
Don't get me wrong, I love Harold Lloyd - both his talkies and silents. However, "Welcome Danger" was a real disappointment. It was Lloyd's first talking picture, started as a silent. When he finished he realized that sound had "arrived" and reshot it as a talking picture.

The awkwardness of the picture is no worse than any other early sound film, but the big problem is Harold's persona. As usual, he is the eager beaver trying to make good, but for some reason he makes his character out to be one of the most annoying personalities in film history. He is outright mean to people who really don't deserve it.

Lloyd plays Harold Bledsoe, a college student studying botany. His father is chief of police in San Francisco. After his father dies, Harold returns home to help the force with a crime wave in Chinatown. However, he becomes fascinated with fingerprint technology and soon has the department tied in knots with all of his cataloguing and fingerprinting. Soon the police department that welcomed him so heartily would do anything to get him out of their collective hair.

It is a shame this isn't on DVD because it is not THAT bad, and it is an important milestone in cinema history since it was Lloyd's very first talking picture. "Feet First" was his second talking effort, and a much better film too. One of the real treats of this film is an unbilled appearance by Edgar Kennedy as a desk sergeant in the San Francisco police department. He spends a long time on screen for him to have no credit whatsoever, but he does a wonderful job of playing the irascible beat cop we see in his later films.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Harold Llloyd is Inspector Clouseau
raskimono16 September 2003
Harold Lloyd's first talkie is a take on the always popular genre of a seemingly buffoonish, and klutzy inspector who solves the big case while acting the fool. First of all, the movie works, basically. Secondly, it fails to heed the unwritten rule of comedy "Keep them wanting more". Every gag is funny the first time, the second time but the third, fourth and fifth... NO!!! Despite this, Lloyd is funny and symphathetic. But I must comment, something was lost when Lloyd went to sound. It's like hearing him talk took away some of his movie star magic, a little star dust faded astern. He also seems to be slumming it, more interested in keeping his fans and his star status than making genuine great comedies. That said, the side kick inspector is good, and the final twenty minutes though a bit draggy is very funny. I laughed a number of times through that sequence. And the final shot and line is what the silent Harold Lloyd comedies were all about. It's a pity we don't get more of that in this movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A window into Hollywood history
classicalcharles16 September 2003
Anyone who's seen `Singin' In The Rain' knows the panic engendered by the arrival of sound in Hollywood. Virtually overnight, the accepted methods and styles of filmmaking had to change to accommodate the new technology, and comedies were perhaps affected most of all. Instead of relying on wild car chases, broad gestures and sight gags, movies now had to include verbal comedy of the sort that wouldn't fit neatly onto title cards, and the dialogue had to be delivered with comic timing, since it was being heard rather than read off the screen. The most remarkable thing about this movie is how easily Harold Lloyd seemed to navigate this conversion to sound. The dialogue is clever, naturalistic, well-delivered and well-recorded, and the music has obviously been scored to support the action, and all this a matter of months after the first appearance of sound technology in Hollywood! The difference in technique is apparent when you compare the broader, overdubbed silent scenes with Clancy the cop and the somewhat more subtle, sound scenes at the police station and with Billie Lee.

As a side note, notice how the character of the Chinese doctor is treated respectfully, and even the black henchman of the Dragon, apparently invulnerable except for his glass shins, isn't the usual stereotype we expect in movies of the period. On the minus side, the movie is overlong and could have done without the opening sequence involving Lloyd and his `disguised' girlfriend. But overall, this is an enjoyable comedy and an interesting record of Hollywood's transition to sound.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Too long, but still pretty entertaining
zetes18 March 2004
Harold Lloyd's first talkie is an uneasy transitional film between the silent and the sound era. It was originally made to be a silent, and it was re-written, and much of it was re-filmed in order to make it play. What would have been best for the movie would have been to cut out the fat. It goes on for far too long, just five minutes short of two hours, which must have been Lloyd's longest film. And I've read that the original cut was nearly three hours! I love Harold more than anybody, but two hours is a little too much. I couldn't even imagine a longer version. It is a pretty good comedy, though. There are a handful of brilliant comedy bits, and Harold Lloyd, more so than either Keaton or Chaplin, was just as good in his talkies as he was in his silents. There's also a lot of brutal slapstick. That was always a part of Lloyd's work, more than Keaton's or Chaplin's, but not even the Three Stooges are this violent! Harold must brain about thirty people. It is mostly funny – I'll give him that credit – but sometimes I had to give his enemies a sympathy `OUCH!' In the film's very funny finale, Lloyd fights a gigantic black man. To knock him out once and for all, Harold shoves his hand in one of those giant conch shells and clubs the guy on the head several times in a row. OUCH! 7/10.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Happy to discover this movie
Steviereno23 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
*** Spoiler alert *** In reading the other reviews of this movie, I realize that I am not up to snuff on silent movies or Harold Lloyd. I have only seen a couple of his films and they were so long ago I can't remember their names. But he left an impression, and when I saw that American Movie Classics was showing his first talkie along with Buster Keaton's first talkie (Free and Easy) in tandem, why I had to make time for them. It was one of my most enjoyable evenings in a while.

The first real revelation to me in this movie was the young Barbara Kent. Ohmygod is she a doll in this - bubbly, energetic, pixie-ish, and with a very delightful voice. Yes, her character is monumentally dumb for taking Lloyd's abusive treatment up until the moment he realizes she is the young lady in his double-exposed quickie photo that he has become enamored of. But she was a true delight to discover. I'd never even heard her name before.

As a sidelight, I discovered tonight that she is also still alive, at least as of earlier this year (2007). She is now 100 years old, and living in Sun Valley, Idaho, apparently. I'd like her to know she is still winning fans and admirers even at this late date.

As for Lloyd and the rest of the picture, it was quite a bit similar other films I've seen of the era, yet quite a bit better. I enjoyed his Harry-Potter-like characterization, Bledsoe's ability to call on luck, pluck and sharp mind to get through scrapes. It actually hearkened to a Jack Armstrong view of young men that - at least in Hollywood - seemed to abound in that time period. That he would win out in the end and get the girl seemed to be taken for granted by the film makers of the era, who had only to show how it was accomplished. With Billie (Ms Kent) as both his encourager and his goal, it was a delight to watch him Bledsoe fight through to the end.

I hope to have the opportunity to see many more of Lloyd's films, and especially to find more films with Barbara Kent.

I agree with those whose reviews admired how well Lloyd adapted to talkies. I was apprised before the film started of the fact that some of this was filmed silently and then dubbed over, so I could not be critical of that aspect. I can imagine and appreciate the newness they all faced, and the shifting of gears necessary. For a transition film, I thought this was an ace - not perfect, but tackling it head on and letting the chips fall where they may. I liked the story line, and did not think - like others have stated - that it was too long.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A huge letdown
Neal997 October 2003
While one can admire Harold Lloyd's willingness to plunge into sound films, this effort is a huge letdown after the brilliance of his silent films, culminating in `Speedy.' Many of the gags go on WAY too long, and sound makes much of the slapstick more painful than funny. It may be that sound also contributes to making Lloyd's character extremely annoying, especially in the early reels. If that weren't enough, the dubbing process used in the scenes not reshot for sound is very primitive and distracting. Worth seeing for Lloyd fans, but not too funny.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Recently Aired On TCM
DKosty12323 September 2007
I saw this Harold Lloyd film as a part of their theme "first sound films by silent stars night" this month. I was surprised & though this film is not Lloyds best, it is quite OK. Harold's first sound film has been recently restored by the film preservation society, & they did a fine job restoring it.

Like Alfred Hitchcock who started filming a silent during this time & then converted it to a sound film, Lloyd did the same this with this film. The plot is quite unique for a comedy film. A Botany Student (Lloyd) is the son of a former San Francisco police chief who goes to San Francisco and is enlisted in the force because of his being dad's son. Then he helps crack a case to arrest the leader of a drug distribution network.

That sounds much too serious for a comedy, but Harold makes it work. He does put his touch of classic romantic comedy into it although the love interest does not dominate this film like it does Lloyds's Girl Shy for example. It just is a part of the puzzle that is there to help move the film along.

A lot of the same actors who were in his silent films are along for the first sound film too. All of them do a really good job. Harold changed Directors when he went from silent to sound & you will note upon viewing it that some of the sequences are still the silent ones with sound dubbed in, at times awkwardly. A few of the subtitles to explain the plot when moving from one sequence to another are still there too.

There a several of Harold's physical comedy sequences in this though no major chase scene like his previous film SPEEDY. Still, for his first sound film, Lloyds effort appears to be much smoother than most. His voice is actually what you'd expect looking at Harold. It would have been crazy for him to have a booming bass voice, & he doesn't.

He does face down sound quickly as he speaks in the films very first sequence. What is most unusual in this conversion is one of the more complicated plots for a comedy film. If you like Lloyds silent works this film will not disappoint you.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not so good
JohnSeal25 April 2003
Welcome Danger was Harold Lloyd's first talkie, and the transition was not an easy one. Well, easier compared to those of Keaton and Chaplin, but Lloyd's silent pratfalls are poorly paced for a soundie and the film is desperately overlong. This is best reserved for hardcore Lloydites--beginners are advised to check out his mid to late twenties silents before investigating his talkies, of which this is the weakest.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The magic is not as evident, perhaps, but not gone altogether
SnorrSm198913 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Until just a few days ago, WELCOME DANGER stood out as the sole feature in Harold Lloyd's catalogue I had yet to watch. This one notch in the chronology had not kept me up at nights, taking for granted as I did that every inch of its shoddy reputation had to be accurate, but the completist in me still surrendered when an opportunity to see the film finally appeared. As the very first scene unveiled, introducing the character of Harold Bledsoe on-board a train to San Fransisco, I expected, quite literally, to feel disgusted at his every move, being confident that this figure of the mortal world of sound shared only the exterior attributes of the silent Harold (such as the horn-rimmed glasses). To my surprise (and slight embarrassment), the first few gags actually made me chuckle, as Harold's character was established as an inventive and well-meaning, though perhaps sometimes overly eager sort of fellow; an impression quite synonymous, I think, with how he often presented himself in the silent years, as well as in his later, slightly more acclaimed talkies. Even so, a neat enough beginning was not enough to win me over, and anxiety arose as I expected the dreadful parts of the film to turn up. As the sweet scenes depicting Harold's first encounter with Barbara Kent and her wrecked vehicle developed, however, I could do little else than realize that the film I was watching seemed to provide me with something so ghastly as an enjoyable way to spend a couple of hours. This is not to say that the film gave me the same, more or less uncompromising amount of pleasure that characterizes Lloyd's best silent work; but then, that is a high standard to go by.

Only a few months had passed since Lloyd's latest success SPEEDY hit theaters in April 1928, when he embarked on his next project WELCOME DANGER. Lloyd had found a first-rate talent in director Ted Wilde, whose style possessed a level of sophistication similar to that of his previous director Sam Taylor. Sadly, at this point Wilde fell seriously ill, and a replacement was found in Mal St. Clair (who, among other things, had once co-directed some of Buster Keaton's most inspired shorts). Reportedly, St. Clair wound up directing an astounding twelve reels of finished film, turning out a vehicle for Lloyd nearly twice as long as any of the comedian's earlier films. The mere length of the film should have made WELCOME DANGER quite a challenge for Lloyd and his crew, not only because more gags were thus required for, but as much due to the expectation of stronger, believable characterizations than in shorter films. However, Harold Lloyd was not one to half-heartedly undertake a project he believed in, certainly not as a character on film and no more so, it turned out, as a film-maker. As shooting went on, Lloyd discovered the recent triumphs of films with synchronized sound; though the technology had in fact been available for years, it was not until THE JAZZ SINGER starring Al Jolson premiered in early '28 that the world of silent films began its visible, rapid decline in public consciousness. By the next year, all major studios in Hollywood had installed the new equipment required for in order to make their stars express themselves through spoken words. However, none of the three major comedians of the day had yet adapted themselves to this new existence; Buster Keaton had recently joined MGM, but was still blessed from dialogue to interfere with his pantomime, and Chaplin, of course, remained reluctant to make the transition for another ten years. Lloyd, on the other hand, surprised everyone by suggesting that WELCOME DANGER should be a talking film, and as the film reached its completion, he hired old-timer Clyde Bruckman to redirect several sequences with synchronized sound.

Make no mistake: the result is a film which does, indeed, suffer from many typical, technological limitations of very early sound films. On several instances, Lloyd and Bruckman decided to reuse the silent footage for the sound version, a method which may have saved considerable time and money, but the dubbing work done afterward is often extremely unconvincing and, doubtlessly, unintentionally funny. I also cannot get around that the film, even if restored and remastered to appear as crisp as when originally released, is far less aesthetically enthralling than earlier Lloyd-features, notably GIRL SHY and THE KID BROTHER. This is an odd tendency common to many early sound films; late silents often look less dated. Part of the reason to this may have been that the visual abilities of film tended to be less relied on for a while after dialogue could be brought in to "do the job" of moving a story forward. Even so, a first viewing of WELCOME DANGER convinced me that the film deserves a better reputation. There are plenty of solid gags and comic situations in it throughout, which Lloyd performs gracefully; little truly remarkable, perhaps, but at least I chuckled at the odd friendship and interplay between Harold and the cop Noah Young, as well as the smaller bits such as Harold's reaction when he discovers who the girl he's been annoyed at while stuck in the woods r-e-a-l-l-y is… Some strong supporting players are also at hand, notably lovely Barbara Kent as leading lady, Edgar Kennedy as another, more gruesome cop, and highly- unforgettable Charles Middleton as John Thorne. Unexpectedly, the story takes a relatively dramatic turn in the latter half of the film, which arguably adds some depth to it absent from Lloyd's later talkies. In sum, WELCOME DANGER may be a flawed film, and less magical than Lloyd's best silent work, but in my book still an enjoyable comedy which filled its presumed purpose of entertaining me.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
See any or preferably all of the silents instead
woid24 April 2006
As you might have read here, this movie bridges silents and sound, having been shot without sound, and reshot when sound arrived -- and it appears that little of the silent material was used. There are silent-style titles between scenes, but basically we're watching an early sound film.

Sadly, like many early sound films, it's bogged down by the clumsy technology. The camera is static and actionless... in a Harold Lloyd movie! Harold has few action scenes, or even moments, for most of the film. Meanwhile, his character, speaking for the first time, turns out to be a smart-aleck, not at all like his sympathetic silent persona. Add to that the many moments when he bops somebody on the head or kicks them in the pants, which in sound comes off as painful more than comic. And the fact that he keeps casually destroying other people's property with no motivation makes him come off as, well, kind of a jerk.

Sound quality is not bad for the primitive era, but many scenes are obviously redubbed. And the dialogue! It's inane, which is bad enough. But worse, it's painfully slow, mostly overpronounced in projected, stage-actory voices. As a result, the film drags on at an adagio pace for just short of two hours. Way too long for any comedy.

And to read, again here, that it was previewed at THREE HOURS, tells me that this must have been one of the classic ill-fated Hollywood productions.

And yet... There are some real treats here. Edgar Kennedy is great as the irascible desk sergeant. He's on screen for a long time, but unbilled. Meanwhile, prominent billing goes to Charles Middleton as the weaselly John Thorne. This pleased me because four years later, Middleton and Kennedy both appeared (not together) in one of the one or two greatest comedies ever made, Duck Soup.

In Duck Soup, Kennedy has a series of great scenes -- as the lemonade salesman with Harpo, followed by Harpo, Chico, and the hat-and-leg-swapping routine. And when Freedonia goes to war, he gets to sit on Harpo in the bath.

Meanwhile, Charles Middleton, third-billed here, has merely a bit in Duck Soup, as the prosecutor at Chicolini's trial, playing straight man to Chico and Groucho. Short, but like every moment of Duck Soup, sublime.

Out of respect to the greatness of Harold Lloyd, I can't give this less than a five. But no more, either. It's for diehards & completists only. I'm one myself, but this is a long, hard slog.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A New Era For Mr. Lloyd
Ron Oliver25 January 2004
A young botanist seems to WELCOME DANGER when he goes looking for a master criminal in San Francisco's Chinatown.

Silent screen star Harold Lloyd made his first excursion into talking films with this enjoyable comedy. Originally initiated as a silent movie, Harold -- ever the progressive -- became convinced of the lasting viability of sound films and had the picture completely revamped, at a cost of over a million dollars of his own money.

Some of the sequences are obviously dubbed-over silent footage, and the entire film shares a love of too-much-talk with other movies of the era. But the comedy is good and certainly on a par with any other sound pictures being produced at the time. One prolonged scene in particular, Harold's foray into the depths of Chinatown, replete with hidden passages, trapdoors and sliding panels, makes an excellent use of both sound & music, and shows that Lloyd was still on top of his game.

Barbara Kent makes a spunky love interest for Harold; she's cute & lively and it's impossible to understand how he could possibly mistake her for a boy. Charles Middleton is an effectively nasty villain; and it's good to see Noah Young, a familiar face from so many of Harold's silent films, here playing a dumb but loyal cop.

Movie mavens will recognize an unbilled Edgar Kennedy as a harassed desk sergeant.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Boy, I would have loved to have seen the original unreleased version.
planktonrules5 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
WELCOME DANGER took a long time in production. Originally, it was approximately three hours long and was a silent. However, with the craze of talking pictures, Lloyd decided not to release it and re-shoot parts of the film as a sound film--dubbing the rest with sound after the fact. Now, the movie was an hour shorter and I wish I had a time machine so I could go back and see the original unreleased film--it must have been very, very different.

While this is a very, very primitive film technically, you can't fault the movie too much as in 1928 and 29, a lot of silent films were dubbed to take advantage of the new sound craze. The end result of all these film, such as WELCOME DANGER and THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND, is very awkward and it's obvious that the films were originally silents. The lips are not even close to being in sync and in the case of WELCOME DANGER, the new sound sequences and the old silent dubbed sequences are obviously different and don't fit well together. But, considering that this sort of thing was common in the day, you can't fault the film makers too much--they were just trying to salvage the films and give the public what they wanted.

The film begins with Harold Lloyd playing a botanist who's on a train headed for San Francisco. When the train makes a short stop, he gets out to stretch his legs and gets his photo taken from a machine that makes the picture into a small charm. The problem is that just before him a pretty lady did the same but the machine malfunctioned--giving her no photo. When Lloyd does it, it superimposes her picture next to his. Harold is captivated by the lovely girl in the picture but has no idea who she is.

Later, the train stops again and Harold is accidentally left behind. In the type of coincidence that only happens in films, Harold meets up with the lady in the picture. However, he doesn't recognize her because she is fixing her car and dressed in greasy overalls and a hat. During this portion of the film, I was not particularly impressed, as Harold treated this lady (who he thought was a guy) like dirt--calling him/her names and behaving like a jerk. This was not at all typical of the sweet guy Lloyd usually played in films and must have also put off some of his fans who were used to his usually sweet persona.

Once back aboard the train, he bids her goodbye (since she is going by car) but it's in such a rush that he doesn't get her name or find out where she will be in San Francisco. So how will he meet her again? Well, considering it's a film and Harold always gets the girl in the end, I wasn't particularly worried! Now in San Francisco, Harold goes to the police station. That's because his late father was the captain and he intends to give up his career as a botanist and follows in dad's footsteps. Why they suddenly give him a job when he has no experience in the field is bit baffling, to say the least! In this new job he mostly makes a nuisance of himself and most of the police can't wait to see him go! Surprisingly, Harold does manage to find his lady friend rather easily--I would have suspected it wouldn't be until the end of the film and would take a lot of effort. This was not the case, as before the film was half over, they were reunited.

Soon Harold investigates a gang headed by an unknown man known as "the Dragon" who is working in Chinatown. He is assisted by the rather dim cop, Noah Young, who is a frequent supporting actor in Harold Lloyd films. Young is pretty funny and his voice is pretty comical--a good addition as Lloyd's sidekick. Their scenes together are very much like an old haunted house film and while there were some funny scenes, the humor did seem a bit forced now and again compared to the rest of the movie (such as the turtle bit). Despite this, it was nice to see Harold using his brain and brawn to defeat the evil Chinese gang--he was not the usual wimpy character he usually played--more like a bespectacled and clever action hero.

Overall, not a bad film at all and one worth seeing. While it lacks some of the charm of his earlier films, the movie is engaging and a nice change of pace--even with the odd dubbing.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Difference in pacing
me-174423 September 2007
Just saw the film last night on TCM (the sound version).

Very interesting to note the difference in pacing for silent gags and sound.

Most of the gags were only funny with the sound off. This is essentially a silent film with sound and dialog clumsily grafted on.

Also, I must agree that the lovable boy-next-door character audiences had come to expect shows up as a bully and low-life due, primarily, to his abusive and rough comments.

Contrasting, TCM also screened Buster's first sound offering - "free and easy". Clearly MGM and Buster had mastered the uses of sound - and how to pace a sound comedy. This film, unlike Harold's, was meant to be a talkie. (on the other hand, in a number of scenes, Buster appears a little drunk).

I look forward to seeing the silent version of this film.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT
bensonj13 November 2001
This film was started as a silent and finished as a sound film. One would expect, then, to see some classic Lloyd "silent" comedy sequences, but this is a very disappointing and largely unfunny film. Lloyd's hallmark was always fresh, original, well-worked-out visual gags, but the poorly timed shenanigans here often remind one of something below the Three Stooges: the Bowery Boys, maybe. In virtually every other Lloyd film, regardless of whether he was shy, cocky, a success or a bumbler, his character was always inventive, thinking up ingenious solutions to the problems he found himself in. In this film, much of the humor is based on his simple stupidity. There are endless really primitive early action gags: one character gets the bad guys to chase him while the another stands behind a large crate and bats them on the head as they go by; a character takes a swing with a club to hit someone in front of him and accidentally hits someone creeping up behind him; a friend puts his hand on Lloyd's shoulder so he won't get lost in the dark, but when Lloyd gets back into the light the hand on his shoulder is that of a foe. These and other familiar lightweight gags abound, and the Lloyd's imaginative building of original gags is nowhere to be seen. In addition, nearly identical weak gags are sometimes repeated several times in a row. The bumbling around in a chinatown basement just seems interminable.

What happened? Lloyd's films before and after this one are all classics of top-notch comedy. This is a lapse that's unique in Lloyd's career.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This Was Amazingly Funny
Patriotlad@aol.com20 April 2006
Thanks to the good folks at Turner Classic Movies, this amazingly funny comedy -- with its various predictable pratfalls -- was aired for free on their TCM channel.

Lloyd is great, not just going through the motions, but really putting his all into the action sequences and comedic elements.

The peculiar thing about this film is that it contains some overtly sadistic elements, which appear near the end of the movie, not the least of which is when Lloyd puts the bad hombre's head in a vise and screws down the vise grips to make him confess to the whereabouts of the kidnapped Chinese doctor. There's whipping and punching and a funny sequence where the strongman has "knees of glass". Lloyd punches the strong man in the chest and nothing happens, but when he whacks the bad hombre's strongman on the shins, oy ... he jumps and dances around in pain.

It was probably a good idea to cut this movie down from around three hours to the running time, but for sure it works amazingly well in the final edit. All in all, an extremely satisfying motion picture experience, with Lloyd doing such a great job as the Original Nerd.

TCM presented a version of the movie which seems to have been beautifully restored and was very easy and enjoyable to watch.

True, the sound was a bit off sometimes but it was a treasure nonetheless.

It got a seven for my vote, and I can say it was great fun all the way.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lloyd's First Talkie - Not all bad but not great
theowinthrop23 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Harold Lloyd's last two silent films, THE KID BROTHER and SPEEDY, were among his best work as one of the three master silent film comedians. They are close to flawless in construction and in their humor. But in 1929, like others in Hollywood, Lloyd had to face the arrival of the new technology. Except Chaplin (who would not make a fully sound film until 1940) all the lead stars had to bite the bullet and turn to sound films. Lloyd, in the middle of WELCOME DANGER, switched gears and redid the film (and shelved parts of the shot sequences, to make a sound comedy. On the strength of his popularity and his performance (abetted by Noah Young, Charles Middleton, and Edgar Kennedy - and the heroine Barbara Kent) his remade film was a hit at the box office. But although he would make six other sound films (one directed by Leo McCarey, one directed by Preston Sturges) Lloyd was now to discover that to survive in Hollywood as a viable star he had to change his formula for the movies. He rarely did afterward - which is why he did only seven sound movies.

His formula was that of the eager young American who is determined to prove himself, even at great physical risk. In a way it is the screen version of George M. Cohan's stage idea of young America on the make, or earlier of the "Luck and Pluck" writings of Horatio Alger. It sounds old fashioned but it really isn't. When we buy lottery tickets we are sharing the American dream of success that Alger, Cohan, and Lloyd pushed - so it is still with us.

But the danger part was the key to Lloyd's success. In his first real masterpiece, SAFETY LAST! he had shown how to literally rise in the world by climbing a building's wall up many stories, risking his neck in all kinds of possible accidents that could cause to fall. But in 1930, when he did FEET FIRST, he tried to replicate the climb in a less than reasonable plot twist, and the added sound of his unheeded cries for help hurt the humor of his second climb. It seems that sound did not improve the humor but undercut it.

WELCOME DANGER was a film dealing with an opium smuggling ring in Chinatown (oddly I discussed REEFER MADNESS yesterday, and mentioned that opium smuggling was the only drug smuggling shown frequently on film in the 1920s and 1930s, and it was always centered on Chinese sections of cities - this film is an example). It has many anti-Chinese stereotypes in it, which makes it quite offensive to Chinese Americans today. It does have one positive figure, James Wang playing Dr. Gow the head of a famous clinic in San Francisco - he is a good example of a good film role for that period for Chinese actors.

Lloyd is Harold Bledsoe, a knowledgeable botanist, who the head of the precinct of the San Francisco police that polices Chinatown (Will Walling) sends for in the erroneous belief that Lloyd will be a "chip off the block" of his father, a famous San Francisco police officer. On the way Lloyd meets and falls for a young woman (Barbara Kent), who is trying to get an operation for her little brother at Dr. Gow's clinic in Chinatown.

Lloyd is clever, and quick witted, but he is a bull in the china shop. He is fascinated by fingerprinting, but to a fault, insisting on getting the prints of everyone in the precinct (police and felons included). The Sergeant at the precinct (Kennedy) sets up a "fingerprint" as a trap to humiliate Lloyd - he claims it is the fingerprint of the notorious Dragon, head of the opium ring that has caused a crime wave in Chinatown. It's actually that of John Thorne (Middleton

The Precinct Commander is under fire from one Thorne who threatens to break the police unless they find the Dragon. Lloyd does start tackling the mystery, using Kennedy's "clue" as a major one, and also getting Thorne's fingerprint from his hat (but not noting anything about both resembling each other. While in Chinatown, he meets a rather thick-headed but respectable cop played by Noah Young. He also stumbles accidentally (he is trying to buy a pretty plant for Kent) on the opium ring and how they smuggle their drugs. When this leads to the disappearance of Dr. Gow, Lloyd and Young try to get to the bottom of the mystery and try to find the Dragon.

The problem with the film is that it is two films tacked together. For the new sound movies part of the silent film was removed, part "enhanced" by dialog between Lloyd and other characters, and scenes with straight dialog (like Lloyd's final confrontation with the Dragon) shot with sound. It helps that everyone has good voices, but in those sections that were originally silent (especially between Young and Lloyd in Chinatown) the silent version was timed differently, and the addition of dialog not so hot (to be fair they tried). One sequence in a darkened room, with sound punctuating the sequence (as Young and Lloyd find each other) is like the visual equivalent for about half a minute of a radio program - which is really odd.

Due to the way the gags were set up, and the spirit of the cast, it is an amusing film and worth watching. The stereotyping of Chinese is hard to take nowadays, as is a curious use of an African-American character who seriously threatens Lloyd with a whip (for a change the character is not cringing or acting like Stepin' Fetchit, but he has a serious weakness that Lloyd takes full advantage of). It did make a bundle in 1929 for Lloyd, and allowed him to continue making films, but it is not a film comedy for the ages.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Chopped Foolery
wes-connors22 September 2007
Harold Lloyd (as Harold Bledsoe) is a botany student who travels to San Francisco, where he is called upon to help extinguish Chinatown crime; it is hoped Mr. Lloyd will follow in his police chief father's footsteps. Beautiful Barbara Kent is also making the trip; she wants to get her lame brother an operation, from a San Franciscan doctor.

Obviously, filmed both as a "silent' and as a "talkie" - sometimes, the dialog adds absolutely nothing to the on screen events; and, other times, talking is the only thing happening. The silent portions with dubbed talking work better if you just ignore the sound; in the strictly talking segments, Lloyd lacks the deftness of his better work. The physical humor looks more painful than funny. A questionable depiction of race grows with the long running time. If you aren't already a Harold Lloyd fan, this film probably won't make you one.

** Welcome Danger (1929) Clyde Bruckman, Malcolm St. Clair ~ Harold Lloyd, Barbara Kent
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Transitional silent/sound Lloyd film is semi-successful overlong comedy...
Doylenf22 September 2007
Sound technology was new in 1929--brand new--and WELCOME DANGER, originally filmed in silent mode, was re-filmed with sound, the crude sound of the '20s which alternates between being loud one moment and soft the next, forcing a constant hand on the volume if you wish to keep track of the painfully banal dialog.

HAROLD LLOYD, improbably cast as the son of a police chief who ruled Chinatown, is sent to San Francisco to wipe out crime among the drug lords. Lloyd is a botany student who isn't quite what the force was expecting.

The opening scenes with BARBARA KENT are delightfully played for comic situations, but again it's the script that's the real problem. She seems a natural enough actress and Lloyd delivers his lines in OK style, but it's slow going to watch each scene develop--and most of the comic situations are pretty lame. EDGAR KENNEDY has fun with his role as a desk sergeant who sends Lloyd off on what he thinks is a wild goose chase in Chinatown looking for The Dragon.

Some of the sight gags are still fun, left-overs from the silent version, but the film has to be considered an uneasy transition between silent and sound that never quite clicks the way Lloyd's silent comedies did. As Osborne said when doing the intro, some of it is "pretty rough".

Summing up: Except for the interesting Chinatown sequence (which goes on much too long), and the slight twist as to the identity of The Dragon, this one is strictly for Harold Lloyd fans who want to see his complete works.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Harold Lloyd's First Talkie
springfieldrental29 June 2022
When comedian Harold Lloyd announced he was producing his first talkie, fans were squirming in anticipation of hearing his voice. The actor had pretty much finished a silent version of the movie which began filming in August 1928. But when the cascade of talkies flooded the theaters in 1929, Lloyd realized his silent days were over. He had been reluctant to make a talkie, saying "I do not believe the public will want spoken comedy. Motion pictures and the spoken arts are two distinct arts." He reshot half of the film and released the October 1929 "Welcome Danger," his first talkie.

Loyal Lloyd fans flocked to the theaters to listen to the words of the comic they followed for over a decade. The reviews from the press was reassuring, even though much of his dialogue was ad libbed. As a novelty, viewers couldn't have been happier. Motion Picture News wrote that "Harold Lloyd has nothing to fear from talking pictures. His voice registers excellently, and there is personality in its reproduction."

But certain Chinese activists were not happy with the portrayal of Asian-Americans in "Welcome Danger." The film's plot deals with Lloyd's character, Harold Bledsoe, traveling to San Francisco from Boston on the invite of the police in hopes he's as good as his father was as a detective there. There's a crime wave in the city, including the smuggling and selling of opium in Chinatown. The movie depicts the inhabitants of Chinatown as traffickers in opium and contained lines of Lloyd saying the Chinese all look the same.

When "Welcome Danger" first played in Shanghai, an activist, Hong Shen, a United States educated student in theater, stood up and protested against its depiction of Chinese. He was brought to the Shanghai police, who told them the movie was just a farce. Shen didn't buy it, and lobbied China's Film Censorship Committee to stop showing the film in Shanghai. Its members agreed. Not only was "Welcome Danger" banned in the country, but it began a series of Hollywood films that were prohibited from that country's theaters showing scenes demeaning Chinese-Americans.

As far as future Lloyd movies being shown in China, after some defensive statements from the comedian justifying the scenes in Chinatown, he did eventually offer his apologies. The actor reassured the county's authorities his admiration for the Chinese people, its civilization and its culture. His movies were allowed to be shown again in China, every one except "Welcome Danger."
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent Transitional Film
mbanak9 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I propose that all classic movie buffs define a third type of motion picture. We already have the "silent" and "sound" categories. If we can allow for another form, the "Transitional" film, we then have the freedom to find the excellence which characterizes selected movies of this era. "Welcome Danger" is one of them.

I notice a drumbeat of whining about "Welcome Danger" when in fact it compares very well within its own period. Other, familiar examples of transitional films will immediately cast light on this brief era. The sound version of Hitchcock's "Blackmail", released both in silent and sound versions, holds up rather well on its own. But as a transitional film, it pins the needles. "Jazz Singer", a celebrated classic, was a very hybrid affair. And Chaplin's "Modern Times" is no less awkward, and has numerous dull spots of its own to boot. Are we required to just bow at the altar of Chaplin, and give him a pass, when he obviously couldn't handle talking films in the least. (Yes, I consider "Modern Times" transitional).

The transitional film will naturally have an out-of-balance feel to it, but no less so than a silent film when viewed for the first time by someone raised completely with talkies. Keeping this in mind, Welcome Danger is a treasure to watch.

There are actually 3 versions of Welcome Danger: Silent, Sound and then a silent version of the sound one. Only the last 2 survive, both of which I have seen. In the transitional genre that I propose, this is one of the best movies I have seen. Rene Clair's "A Nous La Liberte" shows some signs of the transitional struggle, even as late as 1931. Laurel and Hardy required several sound films to get the hang of this. But Lloyd is well on his way in one stroke.

The story is rich with incident and plot development. Glasses, the Can-Do character, shines again as the resourceful nerd who must prove himself in a police district groping for answers. The love plot is as corny yet meaningful, as ever. And the gags are both memorable and legendary. Watch for sight gags later adopted by the 3 stooges. You may not find them funny if you are not seeing them for the first time, but that's not Lloyd's problem.

If you have any doubts about Lloyd's awareness of what this new medium was doing, take the sequence in the dark when he's trying to climb the stairs. Here we have dialogue and NO picture, the opposite of what you had in the silents. Very clever.

OK, the sequence in the basement of the drug clan was a bit long. But that's from the perspective of a silent-or-talkie only perspective. As a transitional film, that was the correct pacing. All right, three gags in the movie were repeated too often. Big deal. The audiences today love it and the audiences back then loved it too.

Because some introductory scenes don't make perfect sense, Lloyd loses one point. (Golly, if you want to see a real problem with continuity, try Frank Capra!). I say GO!
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Creative experiment in sound comedy from Harold Lloyd
gridoon202426 March 2023
If nothing else, "Welcome Danger" would be interesting for film buffs for the way silent and sound cinema mix up: you can practically see the transition happening before your very eyes. But besides that, there are several cleverly constructed gags in this long, at times slow yet quite creative comedy, which also boasts occasionally innovative use of sound, particulary in one sequence where the screen stays black for minutes on end and the action is strictly aural. Harold Lloyd's character can be a jerk and a bully at times, but he is also impressively athletic; in fact, he reminded me of an early Jackie Chan in this film, which must also set some sort of record for most people comically conked on the head with various objects. Beautiful Barbara Kent has a warm, sweet voice, but she still seems a little hesitant with her dialogue. **1/2 out of 4.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Most Chinese Head Injuries in an American Movie
masercot24 April 2003
How many bludgeonings can you have in a movie before it ceases to be funny? My five year old and I might disagree on this, but I think that Harold Lloyd crossed that subtle line in this movie. It started off cute and funny, but quickly became sadistic. Compared to Hot Water and Safety Last, this was a poor comedy; however, compared to the Three Stooges or The Ritz Brothers, it wasn't bad.

Maybe hitting several dozen Chinese immigrants in the head with a club was funnier back then...
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable on its own merits, but saddled with unfortunate issues that weigh against it
I_Ailurophile20 December 2023
When the film industry began stepping out of the silent era, and introducing sound into cinema, some stars and filmmakers had an easier time with it than others. Even removed by several decades from that shift in the paradigm the layperson can watch some titles and readily discern that the director, the actors, or both were struggling to figure out how to comport themselves with audio in the equation. Thankfully I don't recognize any such major difficulties in this 1929 feature, Harold Lloyd's first talkie - though by the same token, it feels outright strange and alien to specifically hear Lloyd's voice, or to generally hear most every odd and end that we're also seeing with him involved. In fact, aside from some possible stiltedness in the direction, while the production didn't seem to have any outward trouble in incorporating budding techniques and technology, it strikes me that the endeavor just seems unnecessary. Emphasized by the fact that silent and sound versions were made side by side, as I sit to watch the talkie I tend to see a picture in which the dialogue and audio mostly feel like afterthoughts, components that are not integral to the viewing experience and which could have been discarded altogether with only a few intertitles as a substitute. Maybe that was the real challenge in 'Welcome danger': not to adjust to using new equipment, speaking clearly, and synchronizing sound effects, but to meaningfully make use of methods that were brand new, and that audiences were demanding for their novelty.

To be sure, from the moment we start watching these matters catch our attention; maybe, like Charlie Chaplin, Lloyd could and should have just continued to stick to silent movies for a few years, for after all, his works up to this point were all roundly superb. Even with all this having been said, though, such considerations do not especially take away or distract from what the viewing experience otherwise has to offer. While he didn't have the same star power as some of his contemporaries, there's a reason Lloyd's name gets mentioned alongside the likes of Chaplin, Buster Keaton, and Laurel and Hardy, for he was a reliable comedic genius. We're given plentiful situational humor, gags, physical comedy, and energetic, playful dynamics between characters, with some bits that are downright brilliant. Lloyd's signature "Glasses" character, kind and well-meaning but less than worldly, earns no few laughs even in the earliest minutes - and, to the credit of the filmmakers, there are scattered but increasingly frequent moments throughout when sound cues are used very effectively (even if an alternative approach could have been taken to achieve the same effect without sound). 'Welcome danger' is lighthearted, silly fun, and if in some capacity the employment of audio is imperfect, or makes this feel more common and unremarkable, the sum total ably surpasses any subjective concerns about the transition to talkies. With excellent stunts, effects, props, and sets also feeding into the shenanigans, this is solidly entertaining all around.

There remain some indelicacies, or inelegance, or inclusions that haven't necessarily aged well. Though it can easily be chalked up to the noted circumstances, the audio is imbalanced, with some distinct weak spots. While not necessarily as bad as what some other titles have done, there are some sensibilities here with regards to San Francisco's Chinatown, and its residents and culture, that are a smidgen racist or insensitive, or that reflect outdated notions. (One particular line given to the star, around the 52-minute mark, made me cringe deeply.) On that note, moreover: all of Lloyd's works have boasted a narrative of some strength to carry the day, but they overall remained gentle, mirthful larks; the proportions in which plot and comedy are stirred together here seem a tad off-kilter, with the story increasingly threatening to overshadow the amusement. All these vexations are also reflected in the prominent stature herein of the police ("copaganda"), the contemporary equivalent (preceding even Harry Anslinger) of the misguided "War on Drugs," and even some small details, like fictional Harold's cheeky obsession with fingerprinting (largely trusted but never proven in reality, and even somewhat debunked over time). All this culminates in extreme tonal issues entering and throughout the second half as more serious airs of the drama and crime flick varieties throw off the lightheartedness, and ultimately I can't help but wonder if the runtime of just under two hours (accordingly longer, for the silent version) couldn't have been trimmed in some fair portion.

What it comes down to is that 'Welcome danger' is quite good, but not flawless. It's well made in every regard, from the noted stunts, effects, props, and sets, to costume design, hair, and makeup. I've no notes for the actors, including not just Lloyd but Barbara Kent, Noah Young, Charles B. Middleton, and all others on hand who give vibrant, lively performances; Clyde Bruckman's direction is smart and sharp (save perhaps for the tonal inconsistencies), and the cinematography and editing are unfailingly terrific. The screenplay at large is outstanding, for even if I disagree with some choices, the narrative is firm, the scene writing and characters are flavorful, the dialogue is well considered, and above all, the humor is simply a joy. Still, whatever the creative process was that led to so much and so hefty a plot, the end result feels like the least Harold Lloyd film of any Harold Lloyd film made up to this point, even disregarding the addition of sound. There are strong elements of crime, drama, and even adventure and mystery that adjoin the hilarity, and for as well done as this broadly is, there comes a point where the comedy rather discretely takes a backseat - or, if you will, the most distant row of seats in a large passenger van, if not a bus. There also comes a point, if not multiple points, at which we glance at the digital timer and are a little taken aback by just how much feature remains, with a great deal of story left to be resolved. The film is enjoyable, but it only partly feels like the Lloyd we know, love, and want. Maybe we can say the star wanted to try his hand at something different, which is fine, and commendable; nevertheless, between both Lloyd's presence and the totality of the writing and direction, when all is said and done the picture is a mishmash that doesn't entirely fit together, and that doesn't entirely feel right on a basic level.

Please understand, I do enjoy this. It's a good time, well done, and worth watching on its own merits; much more than not it's a swell credit to all involved. It also feels in no small measure like two screenplays brashly smashed together, careening heavily between decidedly divergent moods. I'm pleased to give 'Welcome danger' my recommendation - but it's a sadly soft recommendation, and it's safe to say that one should highly prioritize Lloyd's silent classics over this first foray into the sound era. Check it out if you have the chance, by all means, but just be aware that in many ways, some more severe than others, it has problems that weigh against it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Welcome Lloyd
sweetnlowdown215 April 2003
"Welcome Danger" was Harold Lloyd's first sound film, and I must admit while contrary to public opinion I enjoy Lloyd's sound films. And "Welcome Danger" I think might be his best sound picture ("Movie Crazy" is also another contender), and one of Lloyd's best period. Some people complain that when Lloyd starting making "talkies" he abandoned his usual style of humor, sight gags and such, but for some reason I don't care and I'm not bothered by it. I think what most people are missing out on is the fact that movies were entering a "new" era. We were heading into a "new" way of making films. And they wasn't time for anything "old". So when Harold Lloyd starting making pictures I think he knew that he was going to have to keep up with the times and create something "new". A lot of people don't like the witty one-linners Lloyd gives, they feel the character is out of place doing that. What they're problem is they don't realize, this isn't the old character Lloyd was playing. And "Welcome Danger" starts off fast and funny. One-linners, sights gags, puns, it's flying everywhere.

I guess my opinion of Lloyd differs some everyone else, but, I wouldn't pass up the chance to see this one. It's very funny. *** 1\2 out of ****
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed