The Cocoanuts (1929) Poster

(1929)

User Reviews

Review this title
80 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Classic Marx
GrouchoFan12 March 2000
A lot of people don't find The Cocoanuts to be as entertaining as some of the later Marx Brothers films. Maybe not, but it definitely comes close. Personally, I thought this was the Marx Brothers' fifth best film. It's not that it's bad, because it great, but it's just not as good as some of the others, that's all.

As several other people have said, it really doesn't stand up technically as well as most of the others, but that has nothing to do with the quality of the script, which is just great. I truly believe that if I had seen this in 1929, I would have been as hooked on the Marxes as I am now.

There are many great bits in this movie, including the first scene between Groucho and Chico, the Auction, the connected bedroom thing, and the first time we ever see Groucho do his thing with Margaret Dumont. But the only scene in this movie to make my personal Ten Best Marx Scenes is the Why-A-Duck routine. Genius, it's just pure genius. That's my only word for it.

Harpo really doesn't have a lot of good stuff in this movie. He's great in what he doesn't have, but he really shines in Monkey Business and Duck Soup. Those are his two best performances, if you ask me. If you are looking for classic Harpo, I'd suggest watching either of those. Also, Zeppo, obviously, has nothing to do. But then, what did you expect?

This movie has a few actually rather unfunny spots in it, but you can blame that on the fact that this is the brothers' first movie, and they are still getting used to the camera. But it has a lot more comedy than non-comedy and is still a whole lot better than most of the "comedies" that are coming out nowadays.

This may sound a little strange, but if you have never seen a Marx Brothers movie, I suggest watching this one first. It's a lot more enjoyable if you aren't expecting it to be equal to Duck Soup or Animal Crackers. Because it's not. But, as I can not stress enough, it is still worth checkout, and better than than anything they did post-A Night at the Opera.

Well, it's the Marx Brothers best movie of the 20's, anyway.

8/10
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
On Your Marx
bkoganbing28 November 2007
The creative talents of George S. Kaufman, Irving Berlin, and the Brothers Marx went into the production of the Broadway musical The Cocoanuts which ran for 216 shows in the 1925-1926 season. Of the talent involved it was the Marx Brothers who came out the winners.

George S. Kaufman was one of the great wits of the last century, but so were the Marx Brothers. They ad-libbed and eliminated much of Kaufman's well turned prose and things were pretty tense between him and the brothers on Broadway. He also did not like a certain song that Berlin wanted to use in The Cocoanuts and Berlin took it from the show after Kaufman ragged on him. The song was Always. The Cocoanuts was the first book musical that Irving Berlin ever wrote, he did mostly reviews before The Cocoanuts. It also is the only one without a single hit song from it.

But as a Marx Brothers comedy it made the Brothers reputations. The plot such as it is concerns the boom in Florida real estate in which a lot of people got wealthy and a lot lost their shirts, though not quite in the way Basil Ruysdael does when Harpo and Chico take it off his back while he's trying to frisk them in his duties as the house detective.

The Cocoanuts was shot at the Paramount Astoria studio in Queens and used a lot of Broadway performers in the roles. Besides the Brothers, only Margaret Dumont and Basil Ruysdael came over from the Broadway cast. But Oscar Shaw and Mary Eaton had well established reputations on Broadway. Kay Francis is in the cast as the bad girl and she certainly went on to a substantial Hollywood career.

The main thing The Cocoanuts has going for it besides the Marx Brothers is the fact it is a filmed record of a Twenties era Broadway musical. Paramount made very few concessions in adapting The Cocoanuts to the screen. What we see is filmed play. Historic, but I fear not as entertaining as the later work of the Marx Brothers.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I liked it. It was nice.
waugh6 December 1999
The Marx Brothers first motion picture and Paramount's first "all talking, all singing, all dancing" musical will delight fans of the Marx Brothers, musicals and early cinema alike. While dated and somewhat stagey, after all it *was* basically a filmed version of their hit Broadway show, it holds up better than many films of its day. Kaufman and Ryskind, who also wrote the stage show, wrote the screenplay with an eye to making the Marx Brothers wit appear spontaneous and natural. I remember how shocked I was when I first realized the boys were using a script!

The movie is laced with classics of Marxian comedy. The famous "Why a duck?" scene with Groucho and Chico (remember - it's pronounced Chick-o, not Cheek-o, because he was such a womanizer), Groucho answering the telephone at the hotel's front desk (Ice water? Ice water? Peel some onions. That'll make your eyes water.) and Harpo shaking hands with the house detective while all of the hotel silverware falls out of his coat pockets.

Margaret Dumont is priceless as the clueless matron. She claimed in later years it wasn't an act; she really had no idea what the brothers were doing. Regardless, she is the ideal foil for the boys as they tear into "polite" society.

Take a look at The Cocoanuts. You'll see the wellspring from which all that Marx madness flows.

Jon Brian Waugh
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kay Francis vs the Marx Brothers !
drednm23 November 2005
A brilliant film debut by the Marx Brothers in this 1929 musical comedy (from Broadway) about land speculation in Florida, jewel thieves, and well the Marx Brothers. In their first film, all the familiar schtick and word play are already in place with Groucho, Chico, and Harpo all excellent.

As usual there is also a romantic young couple--Mary Eaton and Oscar Shaw--and bad guys--Kay Francis and Cyril Ring. Also making her film debut at age 40 is the wonderful and imperious Margaret Dumont. Basil Ruysdael plays the house detective. Zeppo Marx plays the desk clerk.

A blah ballad is sung to death, but The Monkey Doodle-Doo song is terrific and well sung and danced by Eaton (a Broadway star) and chorus. Oddly staged productions number with chorus in monkey suits and tourists milling about in the background. But Eaton is quite good, considering the early sound equipment. And she has great legs.

Francis is fun in her second film (she made five in 1929) but teamed with the unappealing Ring. Shaw is OK but seems too old to be playing the juvenile lead.

But while Dumont, Francis, and Eaton are fun, it's the 3 brothers who dominate the film. Several classic bits, including the viaduct gag, Chico's great piano solo, Harpo getting to steal a few scenes, and of course Groucho riding roughshod over everyone. What a treat! While Kay Francis went on to major stardom in the 30s, Mary Eaton made one disastrous film after this hit, Flo Ziegfeld's Glorifying the American Girl. That ended her starring career in Hollywood.

The more I watch the Marx Brothers the more I appreciate Chico, who was always my least favorite of the 3. Now I notice his perfect comic timing and I just love his piano solos.
36 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Marx Brothers on Broadway
Vincentb34122 October 2005
Contrary to popular belief, Cocoanuts was not the first Marx Brothers movie. That honor belongs to Humorisk, a silent film which no longer exists. It was greeted with such hostility that one master reel was burned, and the other deteriorated in a producer's closet. It is difficult to imagine Chico and Groucho in a silent film, and while one might envision Harpo as the ultimate silent comedian, his whistling and horn-honking formed an essential part of his act.

By 1929, however, sound was here to stay, and many silent comics suddenly found themselves out of work. In fact, the only two comedians to successfully make the transition from silent to sound were Laurel and Hardy (Chaplin didn't make his first sound movie until 1940, and was never comfortable with sound). Comedy teams like Stan and Ollie and the Marx Brothers needed dialog; even Harpo communicated with his brothers using broad gestures and the aforementioned honks and whistles.

The biggest story of 1929 (besides the stock market crash) was the Florida land boom. Mr. Hammer (Groucho) is the manager of a struggling hotel, trying to lure customers so that he can sell them Florida lots. Of course, Astoria, Long Island, where this movie was filmed, is not exactly the Sunshine State, and the opening tribute to "sunny Florida" shows us some sand poured on a sound stage to simulate a beach and a painted backdrop of palm trees and coconut. Groucho pursues the rich Mrs. Potter (Margaret Dumont), whose daughter Polly (Mary Eaton) is in love with Bob Adams (Oscar Shaw). Also interested in Polly (or rather, her mother's money) is Harvey Yates (Cyril Ring). Together with his parter Penelope (Kay Francis), they decide to steal Mrs. Potter's expensive necklace and blame it on Bob, easing the way for Yates to marry Polly.

The highlight of the film is the famous "Why a duck?" routine. It's Chico versus the English language, and guess who wins? When Groucho tells Chico that there's going to be an auction, he replies: "I come from Italy on the Atlantic Auction." When Groucho talks about levees, Chico thinks that's the Jewish neighborhood. When he asks him what a radius is, Chico responds that it's WJZ, at that time a popular New York radio station. And when it comes to the word "viaduct" he is totally lost.

Groucho: "Here's a little peninsula and here is a viaduct leading over to the mainland."

Chico: "OK, why a duck? Waya no chicken?" Having been told by Groucho to keep the bidding high during the auction, Chico, in a very funny scene, takes over the whole show, refusing to let anyone else in on the action.

As far as the music is concerned, it is difficult to imagine Irving Berlin writing such drivel as "When My Dreams Come True" and "Monkey Doodle-Do." The former is sung in a duet between Mary Eaton and Oscar Shaw (whom Groucho described as "strictly no-talent"). Indeed it's hard to determine which is worse-Shaw's acting or his singing.

There was a song written for "Cocoanuts," however, that was rejected because it made the show too long. It became one of Berlin's greatest hits. The song was "Always."

The print quality varies from good to fair. It appears that Universal spliced together scenes from several different prints to make one entire movie.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Still Crazy After All These Years
slokes19 December 2006
It's been suggested by more than one intelligent film critic that the Golden Age of movie comedies ended with the arrival of sound. Probably the earliest definitive refutation of that is this 1929 film introducing motion-picture audiences to the Marx Brothers.

The great Florida land boom has yet to hit the swampy resort town of Coconut Beach, where hotel owner Mr. Hammer (Groucho) and his assistant (Zeppo) deal with a paucity of paying guests and a platoon of bellhops who haven't been paid in weeks. Hammer manages to placate them ("You wanna be wage slaves? And what makes wage slaves? Wages!") but finds two new arrivals (Chico and Harpo) less easy to sucker while he tries to marry into the wealthy arms of the widow Mrs. Potter (Margaret Dumont).

It may be the Marxes' least revered film from their Zeppo period, but this, the earliest surviving comedy of theirs, provides more than quaint curio appeal or historic interest. It's a nice transfer of their stage act, using one of their successful Broadway plays with nifty direction by Robert Florey and Joseph Santley. While hobbled by early sound technology, there are plenty of neat camera tricks and a less static composition than on offer in the next, more heralded, Marx Brothers film, "Animal Crackers," with overhead shots and cutaways. And the antic wordplay, especially from Groucho, is so fast and dense it provides fresh laughs even after five or six screenings.

I even like the singing and dancing, especially an opening number, shot on a soundstage in Queens, N.Y. but dressed to resemble either Florida or a Haircut 100 video. The "let-us-entertain-you" spirit on ample evidence here evokes a fast-fading pre-Depression giddiness where flappers with wide hips and small chests bat eyes at derby-wearing men glad for the attention.

The Brothers themselves don't really need the help, their craft honed to perfection on stage that they clearly know where the laughs are. Groucho and Chico perform one of their classic routines, the "Viaduct/Why A Duck" number, while Harpo does some prime gurning and props his knee upon every passing dame (and some guys).

Groucho takes a look at Chico and Harpo's lone suitcase when they check in.

"That bag's empty!"

"We fill it up before we leave," answers Chico.

The most glaring weakness of "Cocoanuts" is a lamer-than-usual romantic subplot. Allan Jones and Kitty Carlisle slowed things down in "Night At The Opera," but at least they could sing, unlike Mary Eaton and Oscar Shaw, whose caterwauling here may attract dogs to your doorstep from a mile away. Irving Berlin's score is amazing…for its inanity. Though "Monkey-Doodle-Doo" isn't quite as bad as its title, it sounds like "Blue Skies" compared to "When My Dreams Come True" a lifeless ballad reprised five (!) times in the picture, including twice by Harpo (once each on oboe and harp).

Dumont is not yet the presence she became in later Marx films, but Kay Francis offers an attractive foil to the Boys as a designing woman who bites off more than she can chew trying to make a stooge of Harpo. Audiences may start off thinking Basil Ruysdael is just another straight man playing a suspicious cop, but the joke's on us, as we discover by the end.

Speaking of straight men, this may be Zeppo's finest film, if you go along with those who argue he was the master of minimalist comedy, serving up subtle metahumor in the face of his brothers' hi-jinks by literally doing nothing on screen. Not until "Night At The Opera," in which he set a new standard by not appearing at all, would Zeppo be quite this masterful again.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining, but not much of a movie
km_dickson7 August 2005
Entertaining, but not much of a movie. This first effort from the Marx Brothers seems more like a variety show than a narrative film. The brothers, themselves, are hilarious, especially when playing off each other, but they are forced to share the screen with too many other attractions. There is the singing, romantic lead, his girl, the villainess, her cohort, the surly old cop (who also sings) and even a chorus line of dancing girls thrown in for apparently no other reason than to have dancing girls in the film. The story is flimsy and the supporting cast is awful, but that is to be expected. On the upside, the movie is incredibly funny, and that, of course, is its only real aim. Groucho, Harpo and Chico make the film fly whenever they are given the chance. It just seems like the filmmakers didn't quite yet know what to do with them.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Marx Film - but we'll always regret "Always".
theowinthrop13 February 2006
Unless the legendary "HUMORISK" ever shows up, COCONUTS will have the honor of being the first Marx Brother comedy. It is set in Florida, during the 1920s land boom down there (by the time the show opened in 1928, a hurricane had destroyed the land boom). Groucho runs a seedy hotel, where Mrs. Potter and her daughter Polly (Margaret Dumont and Mary Eaton) are residing. So is Polly's boy friend, the architect Bob Adams (Oscar Shaw), as well as black sheep socialite Harvey Yates (Cyril Ring) and Penelope (Kay Francis). Yates needs money, and is trying to marry Polly. Penelope is willing to assist him, as she wants to steal Mrs. Potter's jewelry. Mrs. Potter is favorable to Yates because he is one of "the Boston Yates", but Polly favors Bob - who is still struggling to get any backers for his architectural ideas. Because he is not making money (or from money) Mrs. Potter dislikes his attentions to Polly.

Groucho's Mr. Hammer (and his assistant Jamison - Zeppo) are hoping to sell various lots of real estate to their hotel guests at an auction. Then two new guests arrive: Chico and Harpo. Groucho notices their luggage is empty. "That's okay," says Chico, "It will be full when we leave." Naturally the arrival of Chico and Harpo excites the suspicions of the local sheriff, Hennesy (Basil Ruysdaal).

It is impossible to sensibly discuss the humor of the Marx Brothers, in this their first sound film and one of their zaniest. Just a few choice moments:

Groucho and Chico (as a plant) at the auction, where Chico knows he has to raise the bids. Unfortunately he does not realize when to stop doing so, so that when Hammer frantically tries to stop him from preventing someone with money from buying a lot, Chico keeps ignoring. "I go higher...higher...I have plenty of numbers left!", he says.

Groucho, Chico, and Harpo playing musical rooms with Dumont and Kay Francis, on the night of the jewel robbery. And Francis discovering that her "come-on" line, "Has anyone ever told you you look like the Prince of Wales?", is being used by everyone else.

Even a slightly sad moment is memorable. When Bob is arrested at one point, a tearful Mary Eaton watches this - Harpo walks over to her and hands her a flower. She embraces the silent brother, who just looks perplexed about what else to do.

It is constantly brought up that Eaton and Shaw are drags on the film. Actually Ms Eaton was quite lively when given a chance, and Shaw is game in one of the routines with Groucho and Harpo. Kay Francis would later show a comic flair in movies too, but here she is relatively subdued as far as comedy is concerned (until her last shot with Cyril Ring). Ring is a non-entity. Ruysdaal has one really glorious moment (when he demands his shirt - he can't be happy without his shirt!). And of course, Margaret Dumont got her first chance to show what an asset she was to the Marx Brothers in seven films.

For a musical comedy the surviving songs, mostly by Irving Berlin (one is by Victor Herbert!) are passable only. "When My Dream Comes True" can linger in the memory, but it is not grade-A Berlin. Sadly, Irving composed "Always" for the show, but George Kaufman showed his contempt for the tune and and angry Berlin took it back. A case of pearls before swine there.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A mixed bag at best, but Harpo is at his most aggressive.
gridoon14 September 2002
The first Marx Brothers film is not one of the best. Comic material of about 30 minutes' worth is padded by gratuitous musical numbers until it fits into a prolonged 90-minute format. And the two romantic leads, Mary Eaton (whose incomprehensible "Monkey Doodle-Doo" piece should've been cut out altogether) and especially Oscar Shaw, are AWFUL! Even Margaret Dumont is worse than usual. However, the reports on the film's staginess are rather exaggerated; I've seen 50's and 60's comedies that were just as stagy ("The Seven Year Itch" is one that comes to mind). Groucho does have a few funny one-liners ("Sorry gentlemen but we seem to have no vacancies. We have plenty of rooms though!"). And Harpo really does make a very strong impression; far from being the good-natured, buffoonish clown that he became in some of the team's later films, here he's wily, amoral, and even a little mean-spirited (though with one tender moment), always coming out on top in every situation, always too fast for the others (including his brothers!) to follow. He's an extraordinary creation, making the picture worthy of a second viewing just to see him again. (**1/2)
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
CORNY AND WONDERFUL
lousvr29 August 1999
A wonderful slice of early movie history. Talkies still in infancy. Basically a broadway play put on film. There's so much to enjoy and study. The fashion is still 20's flapper, and look at those hips and thighs, amazing. Check out the jokes, they probably were funny back then. A rich 'time machine' tapestry to appreciate. Don't try to compare but view it on its own uniqueness. Corny and wonderful.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"That might be a wisecrack but I doubt it."
utgard1415 August 2015
The Marx Bros' first movie is an early talkie that suffers from the limitations of the time in which it was made. The sound is full of hisses, the camera-work is static, and the production has a very stagy quality about it. Really it's more of a filmed stage play than a movie. The parts where the Marxes aren't the focus, especially the lame romantic stuff and the forgettable musical numbers, are tough to sit through. But when the Marxes are on screen, they're lots of fun. They perfected these parts on stage so it should come as no surprise they seem more relaxed in their roles than many of the other actors in the movie, who are very stiff. In addition to being the first film for the Marx Bros, this is also the film debut of Kay Francis. She does nothing in this to make an impression. Margaret Dumont gets her first big screen role here, which is fitting considering she's best remembered today for her movies with the Marxes. In the opening minutes, pay close attention and you'll notice Barton MacLane as a beefy guy on the beach with an amorous woman draped on his arm. It's a fun movie despite its problems. See it for the Bros and keep your finger on the FF button for when they aren't around. Their 'viaduct' routine is a classic.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
the Marx brothers make dreams come true
Quinoa198413 July 2016
What else can I say about the Marx brothers that hasn't been said bu hundreds (thousands? Or as they might say in this movie, "lots") of other critics over the decades? They knew comic timing and how to play off one another. That is, of course, Groucho-Harpo-Chico (Zeppo is there, sometimes, though always the straight man, which is fine, three is enough) - in this first movie, The Cocoanuts, I can criticize it for having a simplistic plot around a stolen necklace, or around Groucho's plan for the 'lots' of lands he's trying to bid off as the owner of a fledgling hotel - because when they go full 'Marx' in their way, it's enough justification for sound to be introduced into cinema. They were pure delight and could be replaced in the dictionary under 'irreverent.'

And interestingly enough this is the first sound musical comedy - I think Jazz Singer was before, but that's a drama - so you get Irvin Berlin music along with the bits. This actually didn't get any 'hit' songs (according to trivia, "Always" was recorded but rejected for the film), but no matter: we get musical numbers here that involve lots of dancing girls. Why? Well, they were in the stage version of The Cocoanuts, so why not not translate it over onto film? Why not also have Harpo play the harp (hence his name, right), or Chico playing piano? It's time to show off what SOUND can do when put to pictures for the public! Oh, and those three brothers are going to make you crap your pants with laughter.

I think that you either go for the Marx brothers sensibility or you don't. If you do, then The Cocoanuts provides enough brilliant sequences and bits to not simply justify it's existence or look past using clichéd words like 'creaky' or 'stagey'. It's great fun to see this movie in what works so well - the "Why-A-Duck" dialog with Groucho trying to show the blueprints to Chico, which shows off how down to the nano-second that the two of them had the timing down to line and reactions, the scene where the brothers keep going in and out and through and around those two adjoining hotel rooms, those precious minutes between Groucho and Margaret Dumont, such an essential team that a lot of screwball comedy of the 30's comes out of their work together - that those scenes without the three brothers (i.e. the "When My Dreams Come True" number) are alright in the full picture.

Of course they would go on to greater and more ambitious pictures, and of course the moments when the film quality changes are jarring (the current print on DVD is assembled from scattered fragments as an original negative is now lost). But I don't think I even need to make any excuses for this movie: it's the beginning of the Marx style, full of 'don't-give-a-damn antics and double (maybe triple) entendres and Harpo doing things like just being Harpo on screen. I can't help but laugh every time I see him, even in a semi-serious moment (offering a lolipop to a girl who's in tears), and it's pure, early-cinema entertainment at its finest.

And how about that over-head shot for the dance number!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Technically crude, but charming
bwaynef26 September 2011
"The Cocoanuts" was released in 1929, only two years after sound was introduced to the movies. Not surprisingly, it's a little crude technically, but I find that to be part of its charm. Like most Marx Brothers films, the plot isn't particularly important. It plays second-fiddle to their hilarious hi-jinks, and there are plenty of them to savor. The musical numbers can be a bit tedious, but they're worth sitting through while we wait for Groucho, Harpo, and Chico to take center stage. Oh, yeah, Zeppo's in this one, too, but who really expects much from him?

One of the delights of "The Cocoanuts" is the presence of a pre-stardom Kay Francis who would soon sign with Warner Bros. and become one of their highest paid stars. Sadly, her reign as the queen of Warners was short-lived, and she is rather obscure today, but she was not only a great actress, but an absolute babe! Having seen her in this, I now look forward to seeing more of her films.

Brian W. Fairbanks
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Too Dated and Unfunny
claudio_carvalho12 May 2013
In Florida, the owner of the bankrupted Cocoanuts Hotel, Mr. Hammer (Groucho Marx), is trying to sell real estates around the area. He runs the hotel with Jamison (Zeppo Marx) and they have only two guests, the wealthy Mrs. Potter (Margaret Dumont) and her daughter Polly (Mary Eaton), that are paying the bills. The gold digger Harvey Yates (Cyril Ring) plots to marry Polly, but she is in love with the architect Bob Adams (Oscar Shaw) that has a project ready for the area and depends on investors to be succeeded. When the smalltime thieves Harpo (Harpo Marx) and Chico (Chico Marx) arrive at the hotel, Harvey's lover Penelope (Kay Francis) plots a scheme to steal a US 100,000.00 necklace from Mrs. Potter and use Harpo and Chico as scapegoats. But things go wrong and the hotel becomes a mess.

"The Cocoanuts" is a too dated and unfunny comedy by The Marx Brothers. This feature is the debut of The Marx Brothers and only a few gags work (some of them are too long, like the pun with "viaduct" and "why a duck"). Chico Marx playing piano is the best scene in this movie and makes it worth seeing. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): "No Hotel da Fuzarca" ("In the Hotel of the Mess")
11 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The first Marx comedy - huge laughs.
cinefan19 November 1999
"The Cocoanuts" is the very first film the Marx Brothers did and is essentially a filmed recording of their Broadway triumph. Talkies were still in their infancy, and the technical aspects of this flick prove it! The camera can barely keep up with the boys as they leap around. But don't let the staginess and crummy musical interludes and subplots distract you... this film has some of the great moments in Marx comedy. Chico is especially aggressive with his lines (he just annoys the hell out of Groucho, foiling his plan to rig an auction with his denseness) and Harpo (with his original red wig, which films dark brown) has never been better, destroying the hotel lobby by eating buttons off bellboy's uniforms and swilling ink. Groucho has some of his most potent insults. Zeppo, surprisingly, has even less to do here than in subsequent outings. This film is hilarious and head-and-shoulders above their later MGM films like "Go West" and "At the Circus." Funny, funny, funny!
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The start of it all
bingoandsnork9 November 2006
I've been told it's the first musical comedy to have been made. God only knows what that makes The Jazz Singer then - heavyweight drama, I suppose.

The first problem you're going to have if you want to see it is actually seeing it. The film has been very hard to find on DVD. A copy is now available on the recently released version of the UK box set of their early films but as yet has not been released on it's own. I believe this situation varies elsewhere in the world.

The second problem you'll have if you want to see it is actually seeing it. Beware cheap copies from distant lands. The film has fallen into disrepair due to neglect. This has meant that some copies of the film are almost totally unwatchable. I remember being given a copy of the film that was released in Australia where parts of the picture had been almost completely washed away while the soundtrack could barely be heard of the crackles of the tape.

Still, if you do find a good copy it is well worth watching. The filming is very static and the acting wooden in comparison to their later movies. However, given that this was their first release and based upon their second successful Broadway run, I think that can be forgiven.

The characters are already clearly drawn out and some of the sketches are as funny as anything they did later on in their career. The 'Why a Duck' sketch can rate along side the 'tootsie-frootsie' sketch as one of the best sketches between Groucho and Chico.

The music is forgettable, the plot wafer thin, but you'll laugh out loud more than the majority of the films you'll ever see.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Cocoanuts (1929) ***
JoeKarlosi23 November 2004
This first Marx Brothers film is quite funny sporadically, as long as you focus on the antics of Groucho, Harpo and Chico and don't let the very dated singing and poor production values get in your way.

Being one of the very earliest sound films, there are less than stellar production values and some very old fashioned and grating musical numbers to intrude during the course of THE COCOANUTS. But fortunately, any time the Marx Brothers grace the screen, it's well worth the wait and they are always entertaining... and after all, aren't they the main reason we're watching?

***/****
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Your eyes, they shine like the pants of a blue suede suit!"
classicsoncall2 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
My choice of a summary line came down to one of two, the other one was "...go upstairs and count the rooms. I think the third floor is missing".

If not for the Marx Brothers, there's no movie here. The romantic sub-plots and intended jewelry heist got a little tedious at times for this viewer, and I'm glad I've seen a bunch of other Marx Brothers flicks prior to this one because this is not the standard by which to judge them. Although they do have their moments, with Groucho pretty much up to speed already in just their first picture. Harpo plays a clarinet in addition to his usual harp segment, and no one plays the piano like Chico, one finger at a time and it sounds great.

Everything else in the movie is pretty much secondary; it kind of reminds me of Abbott and Costello's first picture "One Night In the Tropics", in as much as both comedy teams were trying out some of their standard schtick that would be upgraded and refined in later films. Seeing Kay Francis in her very first picture was an unexpected treat here. Another was Mary Eaton's wardrobe in her role as Polly Potter, her very low slung gowns were probably meant to be quite revealing, but there wasn't much there to reveal.

Still, it's a worthwhile film to catch if you're a Marx Brothers fan, and maybe even if you're not. Groucho's out there with his rapid fire wit and banter, taking it to the max during the real estate auction. Along with Harpo, Chico and Zeppo, they're a hoot in costume during the final production number, along with the Gamby-Hale Girls and the Alan Foster Dancers. Even with a middling story line, there's a lot going on to keep your eyes and ears busy.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tragic Mary Eaton and the manic Marx Brothers
AlsExGal31 December 2015
It's strange to see the archaic musical numbers punctuating the mayhem of the Marx Brothers, but in 1929 musicals were still all the rage in Hollywood. At the time this film was being made, the Marx Brothers and Margaret Dumont were being shuffled between the big street where they were starring in "Animal Crackers" and Paramount's New York studios that weren't even soundproofed yet.

You know, Irving Thalberg was wrong about the Marx Brothers. When he picked them up at MGM in 1935 he said "The problem with you guys is you never help anybody", but in this film the Marx Brothers - well Harpo and Chico anyways - end up helping a couple that are in love, played by Mary Eaton (Polly) and Oscar Shaw (Bob), who were probably picked for these roles for their musical rather than their acting talents. Polly's mom, played by the imperious and hilarious Margaret Dumont (Mrs. Potter), wants Polly to marry Yates (Cyril Ring), who actually is after Polly's money. That plan isn't working too well so Penelope (Kay Francis) comes up with a way to get money by stealing Mrs. Potter's necklace, and frame someone else.

One of the great questions I was left with was, why would Penelope help Yates? She could have just stolen the necklace and kept it for herself and left him out of it completely. After all, she took all of the risk! Their connection is never explained and neither is her generosity. It's a strange role for Kay, because one thing Kay never was in her films was a doormat.

But back to the Marx brothers. Some people complain about the lack of a plot, but you simply can't lock the Marx brothers into one. You need to let them run free to do their series of one liners of which Groucho is a master, allow Chico to be the character, and allow Harpo to be the menace. Note he doesn't chase women in this film because the camera still cannot move in 1929. And then there is Margaret Dumont. Would Groucho ever be so funny as when he is verbally harassing this society matron (she really was one folks!). She always told people she never got the jokes, but she had to keep up the front. Half the fun is that everything seems to go right past her. She looks like she THINKS she's being insulted, but with her breeding she simply can't quite make sense out of her being made the joke - and THAT is the plausible illusion that makes the act.

I mentioned earlier that the music was archaic, but Paramount manages to come up with a kaleidoscopic aerial shot of a dance number before Busby Berkeley ever does. As for Mary Eaton, 1929 is pretty much the beginning and the end of her film career. Not being able to take the end of her fame as one of the Seven Little Eatons and then a Zeigfeld girl, she died of alcoholism at only age 47. As for the Marx Brothers? This film had two directors and they were wise to pretty much let the brothers wing it. They made four more films for Paramount, the last being the political satire classic "Duck Soup" in 1933. Mary Eaton's time in the limelight was over because her time was past, as for the Marx Brothers, their films were not huge financial successes in their era, mainly because they were ahead of their time by decades.

This first film is a little awkward, but that is mainly because of the sound film era being new. Try to enjoy it in that light and I think you'll like it as much as I do.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
way too stagy and difficult to watch compared to the rest of their films
planktonrules6 February 2006
The main culprit for this being a poor Marx Brothers film is time. While the brothers are quite funny at times, the film itself really suffers from lousy sound due to its being made at the very beginning of the talking picture era. This was true of MANY films from 1927-1929, so it is in no way a slam against the Marxes that this occurs. Secondly, unlike all their later films, this was filmed inside an old film studio on the East Coast and it REALLY REALLY looks like a stage production. In particular, the backgrounds are obvious paintings. It also lacks the energy and incidental music to give the story life.

So who would enjoy this film--especially since it has a ton of terrible songs and production numbers? Well, despite this, film buffs will be thrilled to see it because it's the earliest available footage of the Marxes (though they supposedly made a film appearance before this and it was lost). Also, fans of the Marxes will find enough to entertain them to make it worth watching. Most others, though, will not be particularly impressed and should try other Marx Brothers films FIRST so as not to be scared away by the cheapness and slowness of this film. A curio more than a classic.

By the way, this is Kay Francis' first film. After this role, she went on to great stardom in the 1930s--particularly in the Pre-Code days from 1930-1934.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hotel Monkey Business
lugonian9 January 2002
THE COCOANUTS (Paramount, 1929), directed by Robert Florey, introduces the Four Marx Brothers to the talking screen, in which they reprized their roles from their 1925 stage success. Set in a 600-room hotel in Florida, Groucho (the one with the thick eyebrows and mustache), plays Mr. Hammer, the hotel manager; Chico (the one with the Italian accent), and Harpo (the one with the curly wig who acts but doesn't speak), play partners and hotel guests who enter with an empty suitcase with the intentions of filling it up upon their departure; and Zeppo, the straight man, as Hammer's registered desk clerk who is given little to do. Also staying at the Hotel de Cocoanut are Polly Potter (Mary Eaton), the "only paying guest at the hotel," Mrs. Potter (Margaret Dumont), Polly's snobbish widowed mother of high society; Bob Adams (Oscar Shaw), a young architect in love with Polly; and Harvey Yates (Cyril Ring) and Penelopie (Kay Francis), as a couple of thieves who plot to steal Mrs. Potter's jewels. With the introduction of the players, the story line involving hotel jewel thieves is basically the whole plot, but the main attraction that takes up most of the footage are the comedy routines supplied by the Marxes, either together or separately.

THE COCOANUTS predates the kind of comedies the Marx Brothers were to make at MGM (1935-1941): The simple story line, gags, romantic subplot and musical interludes either by the Marxes or their supporting players. With an Irving Berlin score heard for the only time in a Marx comedy, the musical program includes: "Florida By The Sea" (danced by girls at the beach/sung by off-screen singers); "The Bellhops" (dance number performed by bell-girls); "When My Dreams Come True" (sung by Oscar Shaw and Mary Eaton); "When My Dreams Come True" (harp solo by Harpo); "Monkey Doodle-Do" (sung and danced by Mary Eaton); instrumental dance number introduced with overhead camera shot ala Busby Berkeley; "When My Dreams Come True" (sung by Eaton); "The Toreador Song from CARMEN" (sung by Basil Ruysdael to the words of "I Want My Shirt"); "Gypsy Love Song" (piano solo by Chico Marx); and "When My Dreams Come True" (reprise/finale with Mary Eaton).

THE COCOANUTS consists of many comedy routines too numerous to mention, but the highlights are scenes involving Groucho and his foil, Margaret Dumont; the "Why a Duck" and auction sequence involving Groucho and Chico; the split screen sequence involving rooms of Penelopie and Mrs. Potter, as Harpo, Chico and Groucho go door to door, hiding under Penelopie's bed, with Hennessy (Basil Ruysdael), the hotel detective, keeping his watchful eye on the three zanies. With all this commotion, Penelopie succeeds in breaking away and stealing Mrs. Potter's jewels, with the hope that these men will be blamed.

In spite of its age and primitive stage origins, THE COCOANUTS is still a very funny movie. Available on video cassette by MCA Home Video in the 1990s, and later on DVD, it's definitely a must have for any Marx Brothers fan, especially since this is the movie that started it all. After years of being shown on local television, it was later presented on American Movie Classics from December 1991 to November 1992, and presented on Turner Classic Movies, where it made its debut on December 2001. Overlooking some of the faults from its early sound technology, such distortion and echoes in the sound, this introduction to the "Ides of Marx" is truly recommended. And look fast for Barton MacLane (famous movie tough guy of numerous Warner Brothers movies) seen briefly and recognizable as a standing lifeguard cuddled by a bathing suit flapper. (***)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Fine Debut
gavin69428 July 2016
During the Florida land boom, the Marx brothers run a hotel, auction off some land, thwart a jewel robbery, and generally act like themselves.

The plot is almost beside the point, and the story and setting are little more than an excuse for the brothers to run amok. The film is notable for its musical "production numbers", including techniques which were soon to become standard, such as overhead shots of dancing girls imitating the patterns of a kaleidoscope.

For being their first feature film, the Marx brothers were off to a good start. This is not their best film and often isn't mentioned alongside "Animal Crackers" or "Duck Soup", but there is plenty to like here. Groucho's cracks are pretty funny, the song about losing a shirt is hilarious... and some may appreciate the "Why a duck?" scene (though I didn't think it was that great).
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Some overlong singing/dance scenes don't stop this from being a very funny feature-length debut from the Marx Brothers
Beta_Gallinger30 May 2010
By 1929, the Marx Brothers had been in show business for quite sometime, mainly doing live theatre work, but the only film they did prior to that year was a 1921 silent comedy short entitled "Humour Risk", which was publicly screened only once and then never seen again. The comedy team made their feature-length film debut with this 1929 release, an early Hollywood talkie called "The Cocoanuts", based on the group's stage musical of the same name. This marked the beginning of a successful series of comedy movies from the brothers. Every member of this comedy team died before I was born, but I have now seen several of their films, most recently this one. Unsurprisingly, it wasn't as good as "Duck Soup", but it was perhaps a bit better than I expected.

Mr. Hammer runs a resort hotel in Florida known as Hotel de Cocoanut, with his assistant, Jamison. Unfortunately, business is not going well at all, as the hotel doesn't have enough paying guests. Harpo and Chico are two criminals who come to the hotel with empty luggage, and intend to fill it up during their stay by stealing from the other guests and conning them! It turns out that they are not the only thieves in the building. A rich widowed guest named Mrs. Potter wants her daughter, Polly, to marry a man named Harvey Yates, not realizing that this man is actually a con artist who intends to steal her diamond necklace with the help of his partner, Penelope! To add to this chaos, Mr. Hammer tries to make money by trying to win Mrs. Potter's heart, but does a very pathetic job, saying some ridiculous things to her.

I wasn't sure what I thought of this particular Marx Brothers effort right at the beginning, but knew I had to be patient, as none of the comedians had appeared yet. It isn't long at all before Groucho first appears in the role of Mr. Hammer and begins rapidly delivering his funny lines! The comedian had a remarkable gift for that. When Harpo and Chico enter, sharing their stage names with the characters they play, the laughs continue. Zeppo plays the straight role of Jamison, while the other three brothers who appear in the film all play very comical roles, and they all provide some hilarious moments! Groucho has so many priceless lines, such as some of the things he says to Mrs. Potter (played by Margaret Dumont, who appeared in a number of Marx Brothers films) to try and win her heart, and some of his lines in many other scenes. Harpo and Chico make a hilarious pair with their fighting and such, and Chico has some hilarious lines, while Harpo is responsible for a lot of the hilarity with his visual antics and honking noises. I would say each of these three is equally good in his own way.

This is not the most popular movie from one of the 20th century's groundbreaking comedy acts, but overall, it's still an extremely funny one. I didn't like everything about "The Cocoanuts". In addition to being a comedy, it's also a musical, and I found that the singing/dancing scenes generally don't work so well. They can be tedious and can also get in the way of the humour. Since this is the earliest talkie I've ever seen, it's not surprising that it probably has the worst audio I've ever heard in a movie. I guess it was the best they could do at the time, but as I watched this, it was sometimes difficult to understand some of the dialogue, and because of this, some of the jokes may have gone over my head. However, for the most part, these weren't big problems for me (I could usually tell what the characters were saying), and I certainly have to give the film credit for how much it made me laugh! The Marx Brothers' silliness is obviously not for everyone, but this feature-length debut of theirs is probably worth watching if you're a fan and you can get over the poor sound quality.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Marx Brothers have landed.
st-shot27 February 2018
In their first sound feature ( they appeared in a 1921 silent short) the brothers Marx find themselves in booming sunny Florida (represented by a painted backdrop consisting of palm trees) playing a variety of con games. Groucho runs a bankrupt hotel with hopes of pulling off a huge land deal as well as woo wealthy dowager Margaret Dumont when Chico and Harpo show-up to further complicate matters.

Featuring an Irving Berlin score from their stage success Cocoanuts offers up a couple of well angled dance numbers along with some banal duets as well as numbers by Harpo and Chico. The sound is naturally primitive (hence, Harpo steals the most scenes) and some scenes come across stilted (Kay Francis is no Thelma Todd) with puns flying as we watch the early tentative pairings of Groucho with Chico and Dumont in absurd conversation here that would crackle with sharpness in future films. There is also a Feydeauesque hotel rooms scene that foreshadows similar moments finely honed in their major works Duck Soup and Night at the Opera that one might make argument this creaky at times debut film of the brothers was the beginning of screwball comedy.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
My reMarx on this film
Film Dog25 February 1999
I'm a big Marx Bros. fan. Love Groucho's one-liners. Love Chico's sight gags. Love Harpo's harp playing. That said, this is one Marx Bros. movie I just couldn't get into. Maybe it's because it was too heavy on the musical side ("music" may be stretching it). Maybe it's because it was one of their earlier films (their first talky...they made one earlier film in 1925). Maybe it was just a bad copy and that was a distraction. Whatever; it just doesn't stack up to "Duck Soup", "A Night at the Opera", or any of their later films.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed