Candace Owens presents a detailed analysis of newly uncovered emails between Harvey Weinstein and Mimi Haleyi, a key accuser in his sexual assault trial. Owens argues that Haleyi's post-assault correspondence, including requests for job opportunities, travel tickets, and affectionate sign-offs, contradicts the narrative presented in court. She walks through courtroom transcripts and evidentiary timelines, suggesting that Weinstein was denied due process and that media coverage ignored exculpatory details. Owens also critiques attorney Gloria Allred for her role in the case and questions the legitimacy of the broader #MeToo movement. She discusses the legal implications of Weinstein's overturned conviction, calls for scrutiny of the trial's handling, and engages with audience comments from sexual assault survivors who challenge Haleyi's behavior as inconsistent with genuine victimhood. The video concludes with Owens promoting upcoming content, including a livestream covering former President Trump's congressional address.
—J. Spurlin