Mickey participa en una expedición humana para colonizar el planeta helado Niflheim. Es un "prescindible", un empleado descartable. Cada vez que muere, sus recuerdos se implantan en un nuevo... Leer todoMickey participa en una expedición humana para colonizar el planeta helado Niflheim. Es un "prescindible", un empleado descartable. Cada vez que muere, sus recuerdos se implantan en un nuevo cuerpo y su misión se reanuda.Mickey participa en una expedición humana para colonizar el planeta helado Niflheim. Es un "prescindible", un empleado descartable. Cada vez que muere, sus recuerdos se implantan en un nuevo cuerpo y su misión se reanuda.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Mickey 17' delves into identity, colonialism, and corporate greed with satirical political commentary. Robert Pattinson's performance and dark humor receive praise, while pacing issues and underdeveloped characters draw criticism. Some find the film too lengthy and lacking thematic depth. Mixed opinions exist on political satire and villain portrayals. Despite these critiques, many find the film engaging and thought-provoking, appreciating its unique sci-fi and social commentary blend.
Reseñas destacadas
Bong Jongho's next wide-screen project since his historic win at the Oscar's is rather a big let-down.
For such an intriguing premise, we should have been promised a story with colorful development and of gray morality, and yet were presented with such an obviously black-and-white good-triumphing-over-evil Hollywood movie.
The morality of science? The definition of one's self? The Ship of Theseus paradox? Like, such a wasted opportunity to explore the multitude of questions. I guess it's my fault to expect too much.
Robert Pattinson and Toni Collette are amazing, though. Brilliant camera work and visual effects.
For such an intriguing premise, we should have been promised a story with colorful development and of gray morality, and yet were presented with such an obviously black-and-white good-triumphing-over-evil Hollywood movie.
The morality of science? The definition of one's self? The Ship of Theseus paradox? Like, such a wasted opportunity to explore the multitude of questions. I guess it's my fault to expect too much.
Robert Pattinson and Toni Collette are amazing, though. Brilliant camera work and visual effects.
Mickey 17 is a movie that's not bad but not always good.
Robert Pattinson nails an American accent, which to be honest is totally unnecessary given the amount of different nationalities involved!
British features strongly.
But anyway he does well. And he's always great in the role of all Mickey's.
The supporting cast are fine except for in my opinion a terrible character in Mark Ruffalo's Kenneth Mars and yes I know what he was going for. It's just pretty bad.
The story isn't bad, it's decent enough for a sci fi movie. But it doesn't nail any political or social matters like Parasite or Okja, both of which are absolutely brilliant films.
And therefore a straight sci fi actioner could've been better here.
Although admittedly there's some pretty funny moments.
I sound disappointed which is probably the right emotion. I was expecting something really good but this had too much of Okja and Snowpiercer type action and acting to be unique.
I don't want Bong Joon-Ho to become a parody of himself like Wes Anderson. I believe he's capable of much more.
I have absolutely loved all of his past efforts even Barking Dogs Never Bite, which I think is hilarious.
So that's 3 American made movies all very similar in tone. Definitely time for something more.
Anyway it's worth a watch but this is not a classic.
Robert Pattinson nails an American accent, which to be honest is totally unnecessary given the amount of different nationalities involved!
British features strongly.
But anyway he does well. And he's always great in the role of all Mickey's.
The supporting cast are fine except for in my opinion a terrible character in Mark Ruffalo's Kenneth Mars and yes I know what he was going for. It's just pretty bad.
The story isn't bad, it's decent enough for a sci fi movie. But it doesn't nail any political or social matters like Parasite or Okja, both of which are absolutely brilliant films.
And therefore a straight sci fi actioner could've been better here.
Although admittedly there's some pretty funny moments.
I sound disappointed which is probably the right emotion. I was expecting something really good but this had too much of Okja and Snowpiercer type action and acting to be unique.
I don't want Bong Joon-Ho to become a parody of himself like Wes Anderson. I believe he's capable of much more.
I have absolutely loved all of his past efforts even Barking Dogs Never Bite, which I think is hilarious.
So that's 3 American made movies all very similar in tone. Definitely time for something more.
Anyway it's worth a watch but this is not a classic.
It starts well, some dark humor. Made me laugh quite often during the first half. The problem from the beginning is Mark Ruffalo. While most other characters act like real people with measured slapstick elements. Mark Ruffalos performance which purposely mocks Elon and Trump as kind of a merged version of both, goes way over and beyond into an insufferable disgusting cartoonish figure. He tries so hard to portrait a terrible Trump version that the show looses all the subtle fun. Moreover the last third of the movie turns into lame political satire. If you want to watch it my recommendation would be leave when Mark 17 gets invited to dine with the boss (Mark Ruffalo), from there on its a waste of time. It is sad that Hollywood so desperately tries to shame everyone around Trump that they are willing to ruin an otherwise fun movie experience.
Mickey 17 had the potential to be an innovative sci-fi/comedy film, and it starts off in an engaging and original way. However, as the story progresses, it loses focus and ultimately turns into something generic, with an uninspired and rushed conclusion.
Robert Pattinson delivers a solid and well-rounded performance, proving his versatility even in a film that leans more towards comedy - something outside his usual genre. Despite the lighter tone, Pattinson brings depth to his character, making the story feel more grounded and adding an emotional layer to the film that otherwise would feel empty.
Cloning is a fascinating subject for a sci-fi movie because of all the moral and practical dilemmas it presents. Mickey 17 introduces these ideas but doesn't fully engage in them, shifting focus to a less compelling storyline midway through - the Creepers.
It feels out of the place compared to the film's promising start and even the trailers- The initial mix of humor and originality is lost, and by the end, the movie feels like it was hurriedly wrapped up just to deliver something, lacking any real creativity or impact.
That said, the film excels in its production design. The setting and character outfits are well-crafter, adding to the immersive sci-fi atmosphere. Additionally, the visual effects are compelling, bringing the futuristic world to life in a convincing and visually stunning way, which helps maintain engagement even when the story fails to do so.
Robert Pattinson delivers a solid and well-rounded performance, proving his versatility even in a film that leans more towards comedy - something outside his usual genre. Despite the lighter tone, Pattinson brings depth to his character, making the story feel more grounded and adding an emotional layer to the film that otherwise would feel empty.
Cloning is a fascinating subject for a sci-fi movie because of all the moral and practical dilemmas it presents. Mickey 17 introduces these ideas but doesn't fully engage in them, shifting focus to a less compelling storyline midway through - the Creepers.
It feels out of the place compared to the film's promising start and even the trailers- The initial mix of humor and originality is lost, and by the end, the movie feels like it was hurriedly wrapped up just to deliver something, lacking any real creativity or impact.
That said, the film excels in its production design. The setting and character outfits are well-crafter, adding to the immersive sci-fi atmosphere. Additionally, the visual effects are compelling, bringing the futuristic world to life in a convincing and visually stunning way, which helps maintain engagement even when the story fails to do so.
For being a sci-fi flick it does ok. It doesn't introduce anything groundbreaking but it is something different. Does it hold up to other sci-fi films? I'd say no, but if you're looking for an average film to burn 2 hours with this does the job.
I will say that considering who it was written and directed by, there was a much higher expectation. After watching a film like Parasite, which was very well done, this was rather tame. I think part of it is the narration and the other part was the writing. Acting wise I think everyone did a fine job, there were themes that were put out there that didn't quite hit or didn't really matter as the story unfolds, and while I could sympathize with the characters and the situations, the actions and consequences of them didn't carry much weight.
This didn't seem to be set up for a sequel and probably for the best, but I'd be curious to see if a part 2 would have more to offer. Overall I gave it a 6 and likely wont see it again.
I will say that considering who it was written and directed by, there was a much higher expectation. After watching a film like Parasite, which was very well done, this was rather tame. I think part of it is the narration and the other part was the writing. Acting wise I think everyone did a fine job, there were themes that were put out there that didn't quite hit or didn't really matter as the story unfolds, and while I could sympathize with the characters and the situations, the actions and consequences of them didn't carry much weight.
This didn't seem to be set up for a sequel and probably for the best, but I'd be curious to see if a part 2 would have more to offer. Overall I gave it a 6 and likely wont see it again.
Why the 'Mickey 17' Cast Loves Bong Joon Ho
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesWhile it's well known that Pattinson plays multiple versions of Mickey due to the cloning process, what many don't realise is that director Bong Joon-ho insisted on filming certain key scenes without Pattinson knowing which version of Mickey he was playing until just before shooting. This method was meant to capture the confusion and existential dread of a clone struggling with his own identity, leading to some of the film's most unsettling and raw performances.
- PifiasThe large stone was cut with a laser, yet the interior surfaces show marks from a circular saw blade.
- Citas
Mickey Barnes: Our entire life is a punishment.
- ConexionesReferenced in Radio Dolin: The Results of 2024. The Best Films of the Year (2024)
- Banda sonoraTerra Lontana
Written and Performed by Nino Rota
Courtesy of CAM
Under license from Universal Music Operations Ltd
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Mickey 17?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Mikki 17
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 118.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 46.047.147 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 19.002.852 US$
- 9 mar 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 131.847.147 US$
- Duración2 horas 17 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta

Principal laguna de datos
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Mickey 17 (2025)?
Responde