IMDb RATING
7.0/10
1.5K
YOUR RATING
Innovative bakers are paired with the brightest engineers to compete in designing and baking creations that are both delicious and made to survive intense engineering stress tests.Innovative bakers are paired with the brightest engineers to compete in designing and baking creations that are both delicious and made to survive intense engineering stress tests.Innovative bakers are paired with the brightest engineers to compete in designing and baking creations that are both delicious and made to survive intense engineering stress tests.
Browse episodes
Photos
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThroughout the whole first season, the contenders wore the same clothes.
Featured review
HUNGRY for MORE.
I absolutely LOVED this show, and I am sad that there appears to be no news on a Season 2. I hate the fact that I never saw any advertisements for it or knew it existed until about two or three weeks ago, long after the first season had aired. We're not big television watchers, but I do love baking shows, have a decent social media presence and we don't exactly keep our heads in the sand in terms of news, so how could I have not known this show existed (and what ELSE am I missing)? Executives need to do better at promoting new series/shows!
The premise, as other reviewers have already covered, is that teams consisting of one baker and one engineer are given the opportunity to build something according to specifications put forth by the "TEST" they must "pass". The first and foremost, and non-changing specification, is that the resulting build must be EDIBLE, and of course, electronically (or otherwise) viable, motile and/or usable.
The resulting creations range from hilarious to excellent. They also fail more times than may be expected, which had me in stitches!!!
If there is one thing I did not like, it was the inclusion of the food judge they chose. She seemed to have the exact same comment for everyone and it was almost as if she HAD to find fault with whatever she tasted. Not only that, but she just seemed to lack the charisma necessary to be a television 'personality'. The Bakineer judge, on the other hand, was great; as was (to a slightly lesser degree), the Engineering judge.
In regard to the contestants wearing the same outfits (which other reviewers seem to be bothered by) all I can say is: SO? In fact, it had not even crossed my mind as a 'big deal', until I read the reviews here. *I* simply _assumed_ that **everyone** would ASSUME (and remember) that there is such a thing called LAUNDRY. If it were costumes or uniforms they wore, hardly any eyebrows would be raised, so why are people assuming (yes, that word again) that they were wearing DIRTY clothes?
Lastly, in terms of "wasted food" - how do people know this food was not ultimately donated? OR, what difference does it make if a "game show" or other show of this nature uses its resources in money, art direction, production, set decor, prizes, etc., or FOOD? Does it being edible raw material change the fact that any and ALL shows which people enjoy are using THEIR resources?
Again, I found it HILARIOUS, well-meaning, instructive (in that all engineers are NOT created equal ๐๐๐); highly entertaining and addictive.
I HOPE it returns for a second season or that a network picks it up, especially because most shows of this nature are always tweaked from one season to the next until they find their 'groove'. This one started off amazingly well, so once re-engineered, it can't help but be fabulous!
The premise, as other reviewers have already covered, is that teams consisting of one baker and one engineer are given the opportunity to build something according to specifications put forth by the "TEST" they must "pass". The first and foremost, and non-changing specification, is that the resulting build must be EDIBLE, and of course, electronically (or otherwise) viable, motile and/or usable.
The resulting creations range from hilarious to excellent. They also fail more times than may be expected, which had me in stitches!!!
If there is one thing I did not like, it was the inclusion of the food judge they chose. She seemed to have the exact same comment for everyone and it was almost as if she HAD to find fault with whatever she tasted. Not only that, but she just seemed to lack the charisma necessary to be a television 'personality'. The Bakineer judge, on the other hand, was great; as was (to a slightly lesser degree), the Engineering judge.
In regard to the contestants wearing the same outfits (which other reviewers seem to be bothered by) all I can say is: SO? In fact, it had not even crossed my mind as a 'big deal', until I read the reviews here. *I* simply _assumed_ that **everyone** would ASSUME (and remember) that there is such a thing called LAUNDRY. If it were costumes or uniforms they wore, hardly any eyebrows would be raised, so why are people assuming (yes, that word again) that they were wearing DIRTY clothes?
Lastly, in terms of "wasted food" - how do people know this food was not ultimately donated? OR, what difference does it make if a "game show" or other show of this nature uses its resources in money, art direction, production, set decor, prizes, etc., or FOOD? Does it being edible raw material change the fact that any and ALL shows which people enjoy are using THEIR resources?
Again, I found it HILARIOUS, well-meaning, instructive (in that all engineers are NOT created equal ๐๐๐); highly entertaining and addictive.
I HOPE it returns for a second season or that a network picks it up, especially because most shows of this nature are always tweaked from one season to the next until they find their 'groove'. This one started off amazingly well, so once re-engineered, it can't help but be fabulous!
helpfulโข211
- Her-Excellency
- Sep 23, 2022
- How many seasons does Baking Impossible have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- ู ูู ูุฉ ุงูุฎูุจุฒ ุงูู ุณุชุญููุฉ
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content