Change Your Image
Upload An Image
Crop And Save
Tolerable if you're looking for mindless entertainment
Well. I am writing this review just after watching the film at the theater. I assume that it was *meant* as a serious action film. It does not come across as a serious action film. Instead, I get the impression that someone might have watched Dogma and thought, "Hey, this isn't bad, now let's do it without the comedy. Oh, and while we're at it, let's do for angels what Twilight did for vampires. In fact, let's *combine* the two, so that we have humans possessed by angels biting open the throats of innocent bystanders". What an excellent idea. Not.
If you were to ignore both the glaring deficiencies in logic and the poorly-veiled anti-abortion propaganda, you might be able to consider it an okay film. (Maybe better than okay, if the idea of angels with automatic weapons appeals to you.)
Just a brief look at the screenwriters' "logic" will be sufficient.
Point One: A woman gives birth in what appears to be quite a short amount of time, without benefit of anesthetic, and very shortly after, is able to quickly climb up the side of a plateau while carrying her infant-- right after she and said infant survive a car being flipped multiple times, while she's holding the baby in her lap.
Point Two: Angels can possess humans, but can also be killed by guns. And it's never explained why the mob of angels doesn't have any useful powers like telekinesis or anything to defeat the humans, and why they instead stand around like it's Night of the Living Dead while the protagonists escape. Or maybe it was explained, and I just missed it because I was too busy laughing at the seventy-year-old woman climbing on the ceiling like Spiderman.
In general, the actors themselves aren't bad, but most of the characters seem-- intentionally or not-- written to be unlikable, the exceptions being those who, of course, get killed off first.