Change Your Image
Upload An Image
Crop And Save
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
I actually believe this film and the first is much better than first trilogy. First one set it up well. Garfield is immense as Spiderman adding in the sarcastic teenage attitude from the comic books.
The bad guys were also well introduce and spread out unlike like Spiderman 3 when all involved at once. Electro adaptation worked very well and Foxx did good job as he just wanted to be needed like Spiderman is and when people choose Spiderman he flips.
Green Goblin was a good choice and perfectly introduced and the end death straight out of the comics books is one I did not expect in the film as a I thought would happen in third film. The rhino also made me chuckle as a minor villain which happens to set up sinister six plot and brings Spiderman back out over him losing someone.
I do not understand people slating this movie as there is plenty to like. people probably don't like it as they cant understand it or never read any comics or graphic novels in their lives.
Bring on number 3
Let Me In (2010)
Brilliant movie, people moan when a remake is done as not the same as the original, for me a remake has to be different.
Both the young actors provide a solid performance.
It moves along at a good pace. What really strikes me about this film is the way it wants you to feel sorry for all the characters but you realise Abbey is almost using every one she meets, which I understand because she could be hundreds of years old but trapped as a twelve year old.
Wish people would stop comparing remakes as you have to watch each film with open mind as if you compare you will automatically begin to watch a movie in a negative way.
People who are not liking this movie probably don't understand it or only like films on a massive budget, where judge dredd works is because of its smaller budget otherwise would have been a cgi mess.
Urban is Dredd. Action was spot on, like the way Dredd at the end just see's it as a normal drugs bust.
Hoping they do a sequel but to remember to use small budget again as it works for certain types of films.
This only a short review as people need to watch it and make their own mind up.
Just because it set in the future doesn't mean it has to have future lazer sort of weapons. Anderson was perfect also, she was a mutant but done sensibly.
Man of Steel (2013)
How it should be done
I have been a superman fan for years and after the disaster that was superman returns I was excited about this reboot. People complaining it not like the original films, I glad it not as it a reboot not a remake.
people complaining superman doesn't kill, well those people are wrong, superman killed doomsday and also has killed in the comics as he killed three kryptonians which led him to be a self imposed exile on the moon.
In superman 2 what do people think happened to Zod when he fell in the fortress of solitude !! People complaining about level of destruction but what did they think would happen when zod and superman fight would happen, in death of superman half the city is destroyed when doomsday and superman fight, how many people you think died in avengers assemble when the aliens attacked.
This has been the perfect set up for number 2 and for DC to introduce more characters hopefully leading to a justice league movie.
I don't believe in critics as they have said movies are great in the past and I watched and turned out to be rubbish.
I would happy discuss with anyone how good man of steel is.
to say again Superman has killed before example being Doomsday and he killed three kryptonians which made superman go into exile.
As for destruction people should read death and return of superman and see what destruction is I there also avengers assemble must have had a high body count also.