Reviews written by registered user
|170 reviews in total|
John Carter is looking as if it will be another overblown mess of a
movie. The budget was outrageous and somebody at Disney will probably
lose their job over this. The characters were all shallow with no real
substance and for a movie that cost 250 million to make, I wonder where
all the money went because the special effects weren't that great
The story follows confederate soldier John Carter who finds a cave of gold and something else unexpected. It is a medallion which transports him from Earth to Mars where he faces off against many monstrous creatures and discovers a princess who's kingdom needs saving. Since he is from earth where gravity is stronger than that of Mars, he is able to leap very high and very far and is also endowed with superhuman strength which works on occasion, that being when it is only necessary for the plot.
I could not get in to this story and I could not get into the characters. THis was a dull boring movie. It may not be the worse film I've ever seen, but I expect more from Disney. THis was worse than the last Pirates of The Carribbean movie, and that's saying something. Not recommended.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
What would happen if teenagers in real life gain superpowers. The new
movie Chronicle, with a clever script by Max Landis, and smart
direction by Josh Trank, answers that question.
Andrew (Dane Dahaan) is a troubled youth who one day decides to videotape everything that happens in his life. His father is a violent drunk, and his mother is very sick and bedridden, and he is an outcast in school who is often bullied. Using the camera as a sort of shield to hide behind all this sadness, him and his cousin Matt, (Alex Russell) with the persuasion of class president Steve (Michael B. Jordan) find a hole in the ground in the woods. THey go down and investigate and find something strange and alien.
A few days pass, and the three boys soon discover that their excursion into the hole with the glowing alien object has somehow granted them superpowers. The thing in the hole is never really explained, and neither is how they gain these abilities, but an explanation is not needed. Once again the secrets of how and why are left to the imagination, and that is probably best.
Instead of using their powers to go and fight crime, like the heroes in comic books like X- Men or Spider Man, the three friends use them to do what most teenagers would do if they had powers, by playing games and pulling pranks. Quite a few of the pranks are clever, and one of the best scenes in the movie deals with a magic show, which helps to make Andrew popular for a little while before things start to turn dark in the second half. I won't go into details on what happens, but if you've seen the trailers, you'll know that one of them turns dark, and the other two have to pull together to try and stop him from going over the edge.
The climax is a pretty good special effects wonder for the budget this movie was given. It does tend to go way over top, and will make people wonder how human beings can take such punishment, but I was still drawn in mainly because of the three main leads who are perfect in this film.
Overall, the first part of this movie up until the magic show is the best half. The second half is also good, but the realistic feel of the movie goes a little haywire. Still, I enjoyed this movie and recommend it. I think it will be a surprise sleeper hit.
I've always been a fan of werewolves, and I decided to watch this to see what it was like. I already knew it would be a lot like Twilight, but what makes this better is some of the dialoque and better acting. If this is to improve and become a better show though, they need to surprise us with different things and do away with the usual clichés. Right now it is too much like Twilight, and everything that happens is obvious. I kind of know what 's going to happen before it does, and that takes away suspense. Compared to the 1985 movie starring Michael J Fox, this is less comedic and edgier as it should be, because the old Teen Wolf, if done the way that movie was, would not work in this day and age. I applaud the actors, and the two biggest standouts are definitely Scotts best friend Stiles and Allison, the girl who plays his love interest.
I saw Priest, and now I understand why it failed at the box office. The characters are boring, the action isn't much better, the scares are lame, and even the special effects seem cheesy. I was so disappointed in this movie, and after seeing Fast Five and Thor and liking both, I must say that I really didn't like this movie at all. It just seems lifeless. That's too bad, since I was really looking forward to seeing this movie. My recommendation for Priest is not to waste your time and money. I am sure there will be many other movies more worth your time and money. Hopefully when Pirates of the Caribbean opens up next week, it will be more along the lines of Fast Five and Thor.
Skyline is another one of those movies where the previews made it better than what it really is. The acting is sub par and the storyline and plot are nothing but a bunch of chase scenes as the heroes try to escape an extraterrestrial invasion. I will say that the special effects were good, which would've managed to give it at least a 5 rating from me if not for the WTH ending. Over all, I'll give it a 4. I've have seen worse, but I've also seen a lot better. None of the characters have the charisma of a Will Smith or Jeff Goldblum, who both made Independence Day a much better film then it would've been without them. Even the supporting characters in Ind. D were quite interesting, but none of that exists in Skyline. Sorry, but I cannot recommend this movie.
I noticed that Suspiria is listed on a lot of horror movies top lists
so I decided to buy it. I wasn't disappointed.
For a horror movie coming from 1977, Suspiria is a rather violent movie with one death scene in particular that could probably stand alongside the shower scene in Psycho as one of the best ever. However, it is not the violence alone that makes this movie work. Much of what makes this movie so disturbing is Dario Argento's use of color and different sound effects which keep you on edge throughout. He sort of makes it an art form, and that in itself is strange.
The acting wasn't much to talk about, but I wouldn't say it's terrible either. In fact, a lot of it probably had to do with dubbing upon release in America.
The entire movie left me unsettled throughout, and like I said, much of that had to deal with the color and sound. The death scenes, when they do come, are not forgotten, especially that one scene mentioned above which I will not spoil for anyone who wants to watch it.
This is not a great movie, but its one that will be remembered once watched.
This movie made me angry. THis movie was moving into uncommon territory
for horror. I mean this was looking like one of the scariest in a long
time. It had tension, jump scares, good acting, creepy characters, and
some gore sprayed on. I was really enjoying it, and then the finale.
Arghhh. How could you ruin such build up and anticipation with a cop
out ending that just wiped out all the good that preceded it. Some
really good movies can still be acceptable with a weak ending, but this
ending absolutely killed this movie. I won't give anything away, but
suffice it to say that most viewers will realize what I am talking
about if they watch this completely.
THe plot involves a girl who may be possessed or not. A preacher, who believes that exorcism is not real, decides to bring a film crew with him so he can prove his point. He believes that most people who might be possessed are really people who have deep underlining psychological problems. Of course this won't stop him from collecting a big pay day, which he will need to pay for his son's hearing problems by doing said exorcism. Let's just say that young Nell proves to be more than he bargained for, and you're never quite sure what's going on. THis works well. The first ninety nine percent of this movie has you wondering and questioning what could possibly be wrong with this teenage girl, while scaring you silly at the same time. Than you get the last few minutes, and I found myself wanting to throw something at the screen.
Overall this movie could've been one of the best horror movies in years. It has all the right ingredients for being successful in this genre. Alas, the ending ruined it for me and knocked about 3-4 points off the final grade. THat's how bad I felt that ending was. Not recommended.
Vampires Suck really sucked. I mean for real. This movie for the most
part was ineptly made. A few scenes worked, but for the most part most
of them failed horribly. I did like the Black Eyes Peas scene and the
fight in the beginning between the guy in the wheel chair and the
father. There were a few others that come to mind, but 80 percent of
this movie was horribly done and could've been so much better.
Not much else to say other than I'm glad I didn't have to pay to see this very bad movie. Than of course it was created by the same people who brought us Meet The Spartans which most people hated as well. These guys should never be given the production money to ever make movies again unless they actually learn how to make them.
Piranha 3D is a tasteless and extremely disgusting movie that makes fun
of the typical stereotypes that go with college students on spring
break and has a lot of fun with it. I actually enjoyed the movie. Many
of the actors play their parts tongue in cheek, with Jerry O Connell
standing out the most.
Alexander Aja, who directed, has had some hits and misses with horror movies, but with Piranha 3D he has a small hit that has a good chance of becoming a cult favorite once it goes to video after its theater run. THis movie was funny and creepy disgusting all together. Some directors can't do both, but Aja succeeds.
Far from a great movie, but did anybody really expect a movie with such a title to be an academy award winner, Piranha 3D manages to succeed where many such movies have failed. As I said in the summary, it is tasteless, but in a good way.
Splice was a movie that had a lot of promise. It seemed to be building
towards something special, but got lost in an unnecessary plot thread
that didn't quite work towards the end. THis specific plot started with
a scene involving the creature and the character played by Adrian
Brody, and it was a scene that didn't quite work because there wasn't
enough of a build up towards something like that happening. Sure there
were some scenes leading towards that, but in my opinion those scenes
were not enough to take such a major step forward, not after he first
showed disgust towards the creature at the earlier phases of its
development. On top of that the movie goes even farther into absurdity
at the conclusion, involving the character played by Sarah Polley and
the creature again, taking much of the intelligence of the film out of
In my opinion, the director was onto something in the beginning but then took the story into an unnecessary direction that might've still worked if there had been some real build up to those points which led to the conclusion. Sure there were some signs, but really not enough. Instead the movie ends in what can only be called a total WTF moment, and it doesn't work at all. Not a horrible movie, but only average and not recommended.
|Page 1 of 17:||          |