Reviews written by registered user
|
| 16 reviews in total |
Never having seen an Oliver Stone film before, nor any films starring
Eric Bogosian, I didn't know what to expect from this film. Having
toyed with the idea of buying it for a while, I finally got it for free
as a supplement with a Sunday newspaper and I was hugely impressed.
It tells the story of Barry Champlain, a talk radio host who can be
incredibly rude towards his callers, often putting them in their place
before they realise what's going on. Though this is what has made him a
popular radio show host, it has also earned him numerous enemies.
The acting in this film was hugely impressive with not one dud actor in
it. Eric Bogosian is brilliant as Barry Champlain, the troubled talk
radio host with Alec Baldwin turning in a strong performance as Barry's
boss, Dan. It also features the voice of, and cameo appearance by,
Michael Wincott (my reason for wanting to see this).
The story was really well written as, despite his arrogance, you feel
for Barry as more about his troubled life is revealed and you see how
vulnerable he really is.
I'd recommend this film to anyone as it is captivating and, more
importantly real on numerous levels, two of which being that is was
inspired by the life of an actual talk radio host and the fact that you
do actually get radio show hosts, and callers, like the ones featured
in the film in reality.
High recommendation and 10/10.
Aye yours, Cat Squire
I'm not going to say that Soldier is not the best of, or not the worst
of, its type because I haven't seen any other films like it (still
haven't gotten round to Blade Runner). However, despite all the
negative comments about this film, I found it very enjoyable. For an
action film it actually has a plot. Granted, it's not the most detailed
of plots, it's pretty simple but that's what makes it good - you can
just take it on face value, accept 2 + 2 = 4 and there we go.
Kurt Russell did a really good job in his part, not showing emotion for
the majority of the film but when he does it is moving because we have
seen how he has been trained and what he has been through. Jason Isaacs
is good as Mekum, the bad guy of the film. I bought this film after
discovering he was in it and reading a bit about it. It was also going
cheap. One thing I would say, Isaacs doesn't have his Harry Potter /
The Patriot voice here, the voice people may see as familiar to him,
but he is menacing when he has to be and is a very good actor. Steadily
becoming on of my favourites.
I have noticed there has been some dubiety as to the alignment of Gary
Busey and his two side-kicks. The simple answer is they are neutral.
Church (Busey) wants to stick with the veterans like Todd (Russell)
rather than Mekum's (Isaacs) genetically modified soldiers. However, if
the new soldiers prove to be more efficient in combat then Busey will
be happy to use them. He neither causes any problems for the good guys
or causes any problems for the bad guys in an unequal measurement. He's
a bastard to both and a nice guy to both.
To conclude, Soldier is a very good film with a good balance of story
and action. Sci-fi / action fans will enjoy this film if I'm going to
generalise. I'm not a sci-fi / action fan, I'll watch most things, and
I thought this was great. Great acting, great visually, great action
and story.
8 / 10
Rebecca Fairbanks (Hurley) is finally returning to the silver screen,
after a three year absence, in the role of serial murderess Belle
Gunnes. Fairbanks is acting alongside her old flame, movie star hunk
Jake Fields (Sisto). In order to totally immerse herself in the role
and get the best performance she feels she can give, Fairbanks resides
on set trying to live the life of Belle Gunnes. However, all becomes
tragic when people begin to turn up dead and Jake is arrested as a
suspect.
Method (or Dead Even as is titled on the UK DVD) is a very good
thriller and is, at times, quite unnerving. The film Method features
scenes from the film 'Belle' that Fairbanks and Fields are starring in.
As such you get 'real action' mixed with the action for the pretend
film. Iy has been said in at least one comment that it is hard to tell
what is the 'real action' and what is the fake film action. I would
have to disagree with this as I thought it was perfectly clear, but
maybe I'm just more preceptive than some other people. The acting in
this film is very, very good with the stand-out performance coming from
Jeremy Sisto, brilliant actor. Elizabeth Hurley looks very good in this
film, as does Jake Field's wife Bethany (Hannah Yelland). I feel sorry
for Fields having to choose between these two, it's a tough call.
Olivia du Sautoy is very good as Mona, the mother of actress Fairbanks,
who controls her life and seems very over-protective of her daughter. I
watched this last night for the first time and am left feeling the
longing to watch it again tonight which is a sign of how much I liked
this film. It really is a great thriller. 8/10
Cat Squire

*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Sarah (Valerie Edmond) has returned home to Scotland, having lived in
New York for seven years, to tell her childhood sweetheart, Sam (Gerard
Butler), and her dad, Frank (James Cosmo), that she is dying of cancer.
She wants to spend as much time as she can with Sam and complete her
list of things to do with him. However, Sam is now married to Charlotte
(Valerie Gogan) who doesn't like the idea. However, Sam agrees to spend
time with Sarah and gradually his marriage starts to fall apart. Then
Charlotte presents him with opera tickets for his birthday and Sam is
left with the ultimate dilemma: Charlotte or Sarah?
One More Kiss is a very moving film and should strike everyone on some
level. The characters are played believably with the best performances
coming from Gerard Butler (the reason I bought this film) and James
Cosmo. Valerie Gogan is very good as the jealous wife, but Valerie
Edmond came across very rehearsed, it didn't seem natural and Danny
Nussbaum playing Jude, a fellow cancer sufferer, was also a weak
performance.
You react strangely to the characters than you would expect. Sympathy
lies with Sam who's best friend is dying and his wife is getting very
angry with him. You also feel sorry for Frank, who is lovable and
rather clueless and out-of-touch, which adds some comedy to the film.
At first you dislike Charlotte because she's trying to stop Sam from
seeing Sarah, despite her condition. However, this initial thought
changes as you see, along with Charlotte, her perfect marriage
crumbling before her. She is very cold in things she says about Sarah.
At one point Sam says "She's dying, Charlotte" and Charlotte says that
Sarah should "get on with it." This doesn't really strike as a cruel
blow because her life (Sam) is being taken away from her for someone
who is doubtful that they'll last the year. At first you feel sorry for
Sarah as she has returned home to spend time with her childhood
sweetheart and his wife is reacting coldly to her. However, Sarah
appears more and more selfish, wanting Sam to put his life on hold for
her to live what she has left to the full. You see the presence of
Sarah tearing apart the marriage of Sam and Charlotte, until it comes
right down to the dilemma mentioned earlier.
A stand out quote in this film, which I really liked, is when the
cancer sufferer group is in a meeting and Jude is being a whiny,
self-pitying child and says in a raised, angry voice: "Would anyone
like to buy more f*cking cancer?" and one man says softly "I would buy
it from you, Jude. If I could." Just a very touching moment.
As I've said the story is great, the acting is great and I strongly
recommend this film to anyone. I'm a horror movie fan and I loved this.
10/10 from me. Check it out and see if my character summary is right.
Not the greatest film I have ever seen but still I found it pretty decent and, in a way, similar to The Shout, which also starred John Hurt. The film moves along quite slowly, but when something happens it really happens. Obviously a low budget film but the acting is generally OK. I bought this DVD because Julian Sands is in it and I thought he pulled off a good performance, as did the legendary John Hurt. Although I thought this film was good I didn't really understand it. It can be quite confusing and I am yet to watch it again so once I watch it again and see if I understand it I'll update my comment here. Current opinion though, decent low budget horror film with a pair of good leading actors.

*** This review may contain spoilers ***
OK, we have a shark out for revenge against the Brody family. Something
tells me that the shark had a private investigator noting the movements
of the Brody family and relaying them to the shark. - Sound stupid?
Well, yes, but so is the film and if/when you see it you'll know what
I'm on about.
The Plot: Sean Brody has to go out at night and detach a bit of
driftwood from a buoy. As he attempt to do this, his arm is bitten off.
He sits in the boat screaming to the land for help but they're busy
rehearsing music for Christmas and can't hear him. As he's leaning
(rather stupidly considering what's just happened) over the edge of the
boat shouting for help, he's munched - tasty! Anyhoo, Ellen Brody has
the feeling that the shark is hunting down her family and goes out to
the Bahamas to stay with her other son, his wife and his daughter.
While there Michael Brody and his partner Jake are tagging snails when
they discover a huge great white shark which quickly tries to attack
Michael - see what I mean about the P.I? So, Jake and Michael try
keeping track of the shark and when Ellen's granddaughter is attacked
by the shark she decides she's going to go and try and kill it, and
thus we get a stupid ending. Mario Van Peebles (Jake) is out on mast
sticking out the front of the boat, sticks something in the sharks
mouth but goes in as well sideways and the front mast breaks as Jake's
dragged bleeding underwater. Michael's then using an electric charge to
drive the shark crazy, Ellen Brody steers the broken front mast
straight into the shark as it rises out the water due to the shock
Michael gives it and the shark explodes. Yes, that's right. When you
stab a shark with a sharp piece of wood it explodes. Oh, and Jake
survives. The shark let him go because, as Jake says "Sharks only like
white meat!"
This is a very stupid, crap Jaws film, basically. What more can I say?
I think I've given enough above for you to make up your mind. Mario Van
Peebles is the best actor in it, shame he had to be in such a crap
film.
2 or 3 out of 10
As always,
Cat §quire
Dear Reader,
I ordered 'Dear Frankie' off play.com because I am a fan of Gerard
Butler, and because it had a high rating on here. So, it came through
the door today and I have just watched it and I thought it was truly
excellent.
The acting by all involved is brilliant and Gerard Butler is just
amazing in his role as The Stranger. He brings this character to life
and you see how his feelings towards Frankie, and the situation he's
now in, change. Most probably now my favourite actor just because of
his talent to go through completely different roles, from Dracula
('Dracula 2000'), to the Phantom ('Phantom of the Opera') and now to a
stranger being paid to pretend he's a deaf boys father and brings all
these characters to life. Also the fact we're both Scottish.
Emily Mortimer and Jack McElhone are also brilliant in their roles.
Emily Mortimer brings so much realism to her character that you can
actually see and feel how frail her character is. Jack McElhone does
really well portraying the deaf boy Frankie. Definitely a full 10/10
for acting.
The story and movement of the film are both very good. It's not a quick
paced film, but it's not plodding either. It moves along at what I felt
was a perfect pace for the movie and the story doesn't tell you
everything about the Morrison family right from the start; as the story
progresses more information is revealed. It was brilliant.
This film comes with a high recommendation from me! A full 10/10
As always,
Cat Squire
PS. Why is this film not on the top 250 list when it's rating is higher
than other films on it, like Jaws?!?!
I ordered May on DVD from play.com a couple of days ago and it came
through this morning so I sat and watched it and I must say I was
rather impressed. I had read comments on the IMDb saying that it was
good to see something new in the horror genre and about the excellent
performance by Angela Bettis and this inspired me (along with the fact
Jeremy Sisto is in this film) to buy it.
Anyhoo, to the point! May is a wonderfully fresh movie in amongst all
the blood and guts horror films of today. It moves slowly but it holds
your attention well with brilliant performances by Angela Bettis,
Jeremy Sisto and the supporting cast.
Not much more I can think to say about this, my mum and brother are
arguing in the next room and distracting my train of thought. It's a
crazy life.
Basically, a very good film. Horror fans would love this, as would
people who just appreciate good, lower budget films. I bought this and
enjoyed it very much and thought it was a good purchase. You might not
feel the same so I won't *tell* you to go out and buy it, but I would
advise that it is worth it.
8/10 from me, Cat §quire
1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I am just back from the cinema after seeing Star Wars: Episode III -
Revenge of the Sith and I must say I was not very impressed. OK, the
special effects were very good, my hat is off to ILM who have done
brilliantly with the effects. Most of the performances by the actors
were OK. Samuel L was good in the role of Mace Windu, giving a
believable performance, as did Ewan McGregor. Another IMDb comment said
"the usually competent Ewan McGregor spouting some rather silly lines"
but in Mr McGregor's defence, the lines he said are in control of the
script writer, not so much the control of the actor, though may have
some influence on a few lines.
Overall, this film is not as good as I expected, actually quite far
from it. This film had excellent potential but I think it failed when
it came right down to the crunch. OK, it tells the story but there were
some really crap moments, not surprisingly they happened when Hayden
Christensen was on screen. A cardboard cut-out with an electronic voice
box attached to the back would have given a more believable performance
than he did. And *spoiler* the "NOOOOO!" near the end from Darth Vader
was terrible. Incredibly corny and completely uncalled for.
All in all, I am disappointed at this movie and will stick to the
classic original trilogy.
The story: Constant raining is causing the Mississippi river to rise
faster and higher than it ever has before. A female engineer is
assigned to a small town to build a levy to protect most of the town.
We find out she was once 'engaged' to Herb, a local farmer who helps
rally the townsfolk to build the levy. As the movie progresses we
discover that the estimations made by the higher ranking engineers are
wrong. I think their estimates increase about 3 or 4 times throughout
the film, just so we can have more footage of people sandbagging.
This is by no means brilliant! It's not even really good! Or good! This
is just an average 'made for TV' film. I am actually watching 'Flood: A
River's Rampage' as I am typing this. This is about the second time I
have seen it and I am still not impressed and the only reason I have it
on is because there's not much else on.
Anyway, the acting is poor on most parts. Harry Anderson (from Stephen
King's 'IT') does a good job but the supporting cast should probably
consider acting lessons. Not really much point to this production,
especially the whole thing with the grandfather on top of the house.
All the footage of Herb's (Harry Anderson) children is rubbish. Neither
of the girls playing his children are convincing in their roles.
All in all, if there's nothing else on then do something other than
watch this. If you have nothing else to do (like me just now) stick it
on and you can keep yourself amused at this poor production.
4/10
As always, Cat §quire
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |