Change Your Image
Upload An Image
Crop And Save
A good idea on a low budget - better than a near miss. I liked it
I've read the reviews on here and I tend to agree with all of them - Yes, I agree with the people who criticised it AND the people who loved it.
Is it low budget? Yes
Are the opening scenes and character exposition a little "amateur"? Yes
Is it poorly acted? For some of the lesser characters, perhaps.
Is it a very good idea for a time travel thriller? Yes
Has the time travel plot been meticulously planned? Yes, Kudos!
Is the overarching story line well executed? Yes
Are the lead actors and actresses engaging? Yes
Does it make you think, even after the movie has ended? Yes - and that's bang for buck!
Does it make sense? Yes
So that's it - a good idea for a film with a couple of interesting characters and relationships that,based around time travel, and a good time travel plot (which is a rare thing)
It didn't set the world on fire - low budget time travel films never do.
Zoe Bell probably was the best of the actors - I read on here she is also a stunt woman - which makes a lot of sense - She has a great physique and the director knew how to use her skills and assets - Reminded me a little of Sigourney Weaver in Galaxy Quest!
The other actors were a little forgettable, sadly.
So over all - some poor performances and a slightly amateur exposition did not diminish from the stronger points of the movie, which were a good time travel synopsis that was well executed and a good performance from Zoe Bell.