Reviews written by registered user
Michael-Hallows-Eve

Send an IMDb private message to this author or view their message board profile.

Page 1 of 13:[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [Next]
124 reviews in total 
Index | Alphabetical | Chronological | Useful

9 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Another load of 'bias' from the Western Propagandist Media., 7 May 2016
2/10

I watched this documentary knowing I'd be annoyed, frustrated, and kind of outraged at the outright biased view this would shine on the Iraqi war that, if you do your research, you'd know it was all about the oil, never about 9/11, as G.W Bush would have you believe. The Western media had a biased skewed view in their reporting of these wars (still do). They always would show the U.S and Allies in a 'good' light, made you "get on the side of the 'good' guys", never really showing you that over 250,000 Iraqi's were killed, some of them maybe 'deserving' (if that's at all possible at times), but most of them were civilians, kids, women, who did nothing but live in a country that the U.S wanted to invade purely for oil, under the guise that Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction, since proved to be a total lie (look it up). Since 2003, over 500,000 Iraqi's have been killed, still for the same reason, also under false pretenses, for 'Liberation'. What a load of rubbish. Of course a lot of people in the U.S, UK and other 'ally' countries will think this is a 'great true take' on what happened, well I implore you to actually research the truth. As we speak, it's happening again, this time in Syria, for the exact same reasons, under the exact same guise, that Assad is the 'bad guy', as was Gaddafi, all for the oil, it's that black and white. But the problem is, we allow the media to lie to us, we don't question them, as they're meant to tell us the 'truth', right? Wrong. That may have been the case some decades ago (although they still used propaganda then), but now, more so than ever, our so called 'Fourth Estate' is purely set up to manipulate our view of reality. When you see news about war reported on TV (especially in most Western countries), it will mainly only show images to rouse up support for the invasions, to show the governments justification to do what they do, to go to war in the name of 'freedom'. But you will find it's all about oil control, and to support the Military Industrial Complex, which President Eisenhower warned us all of. War is a business, as crass as that sounds, it's the truth. This film proves what I thought, and knew, about media manipulation, giving you a very one sided view of war, to justify, to make the naive people who wouldn't know any better, back the troops, back the unjust war, back their corrupt governments. The only reason I gave it a 2 out of 10, is because of the respect I have for the soldiers, as they're used as pawns in these wars, and most of them don't even know it, until it's too late, or they've finally seen how they've been treated by their governments on their return.

57 out of 72 people found the following review useful:
One of the Best documentary series you'll ever see!, 21 December 2015
9/10

I've watched many Documentary TV series, I've seen 'The Jinx' and 'Paradise Lost' series, and this has to be as good, if not better. I've not been so wild, surprised, annoyed and upset over a TV show like this in years. What Steven Avery and his family goes through is amazing. I knew that some police departments in the U.S have 'questionable' tactics, and after seeing the 'Paradise Lost' series you see that, but you really do hope it's not a common thing. But then you see shows like this one, and it really makes you wonder, how systemic is it in some of the State Police departments? And if this is just one other example of it, how many other times have other Police Departments gotten away with doing this? How many innocent people are in jail right now? Then add to that the privatization of the prison systems, meaning they have to keep the incarceration rate to near capacity to make their profits, then it makes you wonder how many people have been incarcerated using false evidence or coerced confessions. The judicial system leaves a lot to be desired, I'll say that much. I highly recommend this documentary series. It will leave you flabbergasted, it did that for me. I'll give this a 9.5 out of 10.

39 out of 48 people found the following review useful:
Totally overrated. Can't understand why it rated over 5 stars! (19-02-2014), 19 February 2014
1/10

I saw the trailer and the poster for this movie, and when I saw that reputable Horror websites like Fearnet say "Must-see" and Fangoria say "Chilling", I thought, "this movie must be at least decent"...well I was proved wrong! Here's what this movie ISN'T; thought provoking, original, riveting, engaging, well acted. It was long (even though it was only 80 minutes), boring, mediocre, and just plain bad. The cover/poster closely resembles the hit film 'THE CONJURING' (even the name was changed from 'SADER RIDGE' to 'THE INVOKING' to cash in on its success). But those are the ONLY similarities to that movie, the acting is poor, the story is totally cliché and been done before (in a much better context mind you), and yet again I'm left thinking how did this movie get financed?? People must want to throw money away. And as for the rating being at 5.7 out of 10 (on the date of this review February 19, 2014), in my opinion this does NOT deserve it, more like an average of about 2.5 out of 10 at most! So with that said, I give this rubbish a 1 out of 10. Do not waste your time.

4 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
A bad "haunting" movie. Total waste of time., 18 February 2014
1/10

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Well, after seeing the trailer for this, I was hoping it would be at least decent - well I was wrong. Rumer Willis is almost naked from the start, which in my opinion she didn't need to be. Yes she has a good body, but her acting ability isn't that good. There's a lot of clichés in the film, girl kisses girl, scantily dressed women, a sex scene, and plot clichés to boot. Don't get me wrong, almost nude women isn't a bad thing, but in the right context. When the story line doesn't need it, then don't do it (although some classic horror uses it a lot, the operative word here being "classic", this will never be). The plot is quite weak, they use an actual experiment name in the title to hook people in, but the film didn't really need it as the plot could have been about a group of young people who go to a house to see if there are ghosts there. But I guess they were trying to make it "original", yet they failed. Very disappointed by this movie. All I can give it is 1 out of 10.

4 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Not much better than 'Cabin Fever 2', and that was rubbish., 15 February 2014
4/10

After the debacle that was 'CABIN FEVER 2', I was hoping that this movie going to be better. Well it was only marginally better in my opinion. If only Eli Roth had more of an "on hands" role with this film, could have been a much better movie. I liked the plot, but it wasn't executed in the way it could have been in my opinion. I find this a commonly occurring theme with sequels, the new director has the potential to make the series better, but then they change things too much and try too hard which usually ends in failure. Some of the effects were OK, and although it was quite bloody in some parts, the film didn't really deliver as I was hoping it would. For me the first one was the best, and it will stay that way. All I can give this movie is a 4 out of 10.

Nurse 3D (2013)
0 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
May as well been labeled as Soft Porn Horror., 14 February 2014
2/10

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I was actually looking forward to seeing this movie (being a Horror buff), but after seeing it I was really disappointed. For starters, the acting was bad (Paz de la Huerta either can't act or she was trying too hard), and I can't believe I'm going to complain about this but there was a lot of nudity that didn't need to be in the film. Don't get me wrong, I like nudity, but it was overused in my opinion. It was like the producers/director relied on it to make the film more "appealing" to some audiences. I've actually seen some Adult films that have had better acting and story lines in them. And another thing that I couldn't get over was that if this was a real Hospital there would be Law Suits galore, if not for the sexual harassment, definitely for the practices. Also the uniforms of the nurses were like something a Stripper would wear. Yes some of the horror effects were pretty good, but the movie relied too much on the "Sexual" contents and elements. Like I said, i don't mind the odd nude shot or full frontal nudity, but this movie was using it where it didn't need to, if they had a good writer and/or director. All I can give this film is 2 out of 10, mainly because of the kill scenes, as they were the only redeeming feature about this movie.

Oldboy (2013)
7 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Great movie. I don't care if its a "Remake", this is very well done., 13 February 2014
8/10

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I saw this movie having never seen the original (so sue me), and I'm glad I didn't see the original. This movie was only given 5 out of 10 on IMDb, but after seeing it I think most of the people who reviewed/rated it were basing it on the fact that it was a Remake, and they "don't like remakes". Well, I for one LOVED this movie. Josh Brolin plays the part well, and I was watching this film wondering how he was going to get through his "ordeal", and his character had me gripped to his plight, I needed to see how it all panned out. I don't care if people have seen the original and they don't want to give this version a chance, because in my opinion you should see this film. Spike Lee does a great job with this movie, and it shows in the performances for me. Then there's the plot twist near the end - WOW. My girlfriend and I were talking about this movie after we went to bed. It had that affect on us. Great movie, I don't care if its another "remake", I loved it. I give it an 8.5 out of 10. Recommended.

Odd Thomas (2013)
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
A good movie. Nice "sad" twist near the end., 13 February 2014
8/10

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I saw the trailer for this film a little while ago, and I knew then I has to see it. It looked like a bit of fun and had my interest. And I was pleasantly surprised. The cast in the film are really good, and having Willem Dafoe definitely helps. The film is about a guy called Odd Thomas (yes, thats his name), and he can see dead people. But he soon notices that there is a lot of activity going on - more than usual. Even though there was a bit of CGI in this movie, I still found it to be entertaining. The story is pretty good, and the end is a bit sad, a nice plot twist. I enjoyed this movie. It kept me intrigued from start to finish. I give it an 8 out of 10.

1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
A very good "Revenge" type movie! If you're a parent, then you should see this!, 23 January 2014
8/10

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

This film is one I wanted to see for over a year. I have talked to the Director via Facebook and after seeing the trailer and the plot, I knew I had to see it. It starts off with a story that all parents can relate to, a child is born, and you see the love between them and their little girl. Its spread over a few years and you see the deterioration of the parents relationship, but the love for the child doesn't change. But then something horrific happens to the child, and the blame game starts. The story focuses more on the father, and how he deals with the situation. But when he finally finds out who was involved with his daughters tragedy, the movie switches gear and things get pretty graphic. Yes the acting isn't top notch, but you look past that when you get in to the story, as it is totally relatable. Now, if you're squeamish, then be warned this film gets pretty gory. I have to admit I had a tear in my eye in the first stanza of the film as what happens with the little girl is not nice. Then the Director/Producer Chris Sun takes you through the gamut of emotions as you see how the father gets his revenge. I was totally behind him as he reeks his revenge, but you're also torn because of who it is. I thought the film was very well done for that reason, and as a result I had to give it an 8 out of 10. Recommended.

Carrie (2013)
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
A Remake that didn't need to be made. BUT, not a horrible film either., 5 January 2014
6/10

>> MINI REVIEW << After hearing different things about this version of the Stephen King book, I was hoping this would be a very good remake. But after seeing it I thought it was about average at best. Yes the effects were pretty good, but compared to the original it seems that yet again there didn't need to be a remake. If you are a true horror fan, then you wouldn't need to see this as the original would suffice, and in my opinion a better version. But for those who were born after the 80's then this version would be more for them (in my opinion). It just seemed that this remake was produced to retell the story for those who think that the original 1976 movie maybe "too old-school" for them. But for me the original is the better version. In saying that I thought Chloe Moretz and Julianne Moore played the parts well. So I give this version a 6.5 out of 10. Not a bad movie, but not that great either.


Page 1 of 13:[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [Next]