Change Your Image
Upload An Image
Crop And Save
also this isn't in any particular order.m
not a bad horror movie
it wasn't actually a bad film,sure the directing and scenery was a bit off and the acting was only half decent. but it has some elements i seemed to enjoy. like the part where one bloke gets a spear thrown up his anus. or when a security guard gets an ax lodged into his chest. or another bloke getting his throat slit. some of these things i enjoyed about the movie, the movie wasn't that scary but it had some decent fighting scenes, and a laughable comedy segment.
overall this film wasn't half bad, just needed a few touch ups and it had the possibility of being a good film. but it lacks a few things which makes it a half decent film, like for instance, in the description, it reads that the film is in a Hollywood mansion, when i watched the film, it looked like it was in a warehouse. also the effects were actually a bit bad. the only reason i'm giving it a 5 is because there is actually a pretty good twist halfway through the film. but aside this, i reckon it was a half decent film, if you're into B-grade horror with a bit off effects, you'l enjoy this film. if you only like the top-notch stuff like "the departed" you shouldn't watch this.
Paranormal Activity 3 (2011)
we all know it
i would just like to start this review by asking: How the hell did this movie get 6.3? has everybody succumbed cheap, idiotic, pointless B-grade horror.
1. this movie is not scary, it does better as a comedy
2. the plot is absolutely pointless and poorly written.
3. it is like 12-year old's are acting in this movie.
4. this movies story line is completely stupid, its just a series of a still camera showing someone screaming.
this movie has the worst, and cheap horror elements, it lacks suspense and and thrills. it includes, poor story line, acting suspense and horror. this film is the worst of the worst, Justin Bieber's movie dominates paranormal activity three, and we all know, Justin Bieber's movie, was crap.
i would rate it -10000000, but i cant
a decent film
when i started to watch this movie, i figured it had some potential and it would build up to be a good movie. but after the second half of this film it starts to get boring. although the acting is decent, the fighting is actually pretty good and the blood effects were well done. but when this film reaches the second half, it starts to become less entertaining and looks quiet fake and just plain stupid. honestly, the final fight with the executioner on some sand? that was just plain idiotic, especially the part where you find out when David lord (Kellan Lutz) is actually a special agent. this movie had some good potential and some exciting scenes but towards the end, it just seems to go down.
i would have probably given it a five, if it didn't have Johnny Messner and Samuel Jackson, those two are good actors.
people go on a camping trip and get tormented by a bitch with no face.
*MIGHT CONTAIN A SPOILER*
OK first of all, i know this film was a low budget horror film, but it was even worse than (prom night) with Jamie lee Curtis.its just really badly presented, ya know?
this film is set in the woods where a bunch of campers are confronted by a girl with no face, she will not killing until she finds a new face to cut off and wear as her own.
Now the thing is with this film, is that the plot is good, but the really poor things about this film, was how it was presented and directed. the acting was really awful and half the time, all that happens is that there is someone screaming: NO! this film also lacked the thrill, its boring, dull and plain. If the film was more creative and wasn't so poorly organized, it COULD have been a decent movie.
if you're into cheap, lame, exaggerated films, you will enjoy this one...