20 Reviews
Sort by:
Rabbit Hole (2010)
A gripping and heart wrenching film about how everyone deals with grief differently
11 December 2010
I just watched this film and went into it with fairly high expectations due to the insane amount of buzz surrounding it and the performances of the cast. For the most part I was not disappointed. I liked how the story progressed and slowly you are offered pieces of the puzzle regarding the death of Howie (Eckhart) and Becca's (Kidman) son. You have to keep watching really to get the whole story as to what happened and in the process it really effectively draws you into the character's heads and what they truly are feeling. Nicole Kidman gives quite possibly the finest performance of her career which will almost assure her a 3rd Oscar nomination. She hits all the notes perfectly in a very nuanced performance that demonstrates the grief, confusion and utter despair this woman is going through even if she doesn't show it enough for her husband's liking. Eckhart gives an almost equally compelling performance as the husband who is dealing with his grief very differently than his wife's. Dianne Weist rounds out with a great performance as Becca's mother who tries to support her daughter in anyway she can albeit sometimes it seems as if Becca would rather she just leave her along. Well acted, emotionally riveting and while melodramatic at times, a very realistic portrayal of grief.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Invictus (2009)
Freeman shines as Nelson Mandella leading a nation towards unity
6 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I remember first hearing about the biopic Clint Eastwood was doing on Nelson Mandela with Morgan Freeman in the role and instantly knew I wanted to see the film. To find out it was about the world cup of rugby and Mandela leading the campaign for South Africa to win the title I wasn't so sure if I was as enthused as before. I was wrong. Sure, this movie has everything your typical sports drama does. Sentimentality, coming from behind to beat all odds, but through the rugby you see Mandela's vision for his racially divided country. I loved the first half of this movie leading up to the final game of the World Cup. From the opening scene seeing the black children playing soccer, and the white children playing rugby. Then to see Mandela drive by just after being freed from prison. It set the tone for the entire movie.

While this isn't a masterpiece by any stretch, I feel it accurately captured what Mandela meant to South Africa and the world. Morgan Freeman plays the role not as an impersonation, but as an embodiment that should definitely net him an Oscar nomination.

2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Typical feel good sports story that is driven by a compelling performance by Bullock
5 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I usually am not one for the sappy, beat all odds athlete stories because usually they are a dime a dozen. The Blind Side follows the usual trend. The story is laden with clichés, predictable and at times a little melodramatic. This film though was quite touching and the vehicle for that was Leigh Anne Tuhoy played by Sandra Bullock. While the role is showy and at times maybe a bit over the top, I blame that on the writing and not Bullock. There are several outstanding scenes in this movie that should assure Bullock of her first Oscar nomination, hell maybe even a win. The one scene that moved me the most is when Leigh Anne was talking to Mike's real mother. Not much was said, but the facial expressions on Leigh Anne's face said it all. It was so touching to see Leigh Anne begin to realize just where this boy came from. Its easy to see why this film has become such a hit over the holidays and its easy to see where all the praise for Bullock is coming from. This film is by no means flawless, but it is a neat little story.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Unbelievably well crafted, one of the best of the 90's
4 January 2010
I hadn't watched this film in its entirety in probably 10 years so I felt it was time for a re-watch. It still holds up as one of my favourite films from the 90's. The very intricate adaptation of King's work is so smartly done by Frank Darabont. You have to pay attention to all the little details in order to make sense of the film at the end. Its no easy task as the movie can move at a snails pace at times, but that's what makes it so great. Its not trying to be flashy, its trying to portray a very realistic view inside a mid 20th century New England prison. You come to feel for every single one of these characters and most importantly understand their motivations. A film like this could have went so badly, but the actors and Darabont seem to make it look effortless. The cast as an ensemble works wonderfully and Morgan Freeman quite possibly gives the best performance of his career.

Its too bad this film was released in a year that saw it competing against Forrest Gump and Pulp Fiction. One of the most underrated films of the last 20 years. If it had been a different year, it could have cleaned up at the Oscar.s I don't know if it deserves to be #1 on IMDb's 250, but it definitely deserves a high spot.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Avatar (2009)
Visually stunning, but boring story hinders it from being a masterpiece.
21 December 2009
Here we are in 2009. It has been 12 years since Cameron last gave us one of his blockbusters in Titanic. With Avatar he set out to change the way we watch movies with his new motion capture technology all in 3D. Did he succeed? Sort of. While no one can deny the visual masterpiece this film is, there are some major problems that hinder Avatar from being one of the greatest movies of our time. The big problem I had with this movie was the story itself. It was redundant, one dimensional and well, boring. There were times throughout the film that I was compelled and on the edge of my seat, but for a 2.5 hrs + film, you need to feel that way 90% of the time. I am not naive, I knew going into a James Cameron film the story and especially the script wasn't going to rivet me out of my chair, but I at least expected to be entertained by it. I wasn't. The commentaries Cameron seems to do on anti-war and environmentalism just did not resonate with me. The dialogue in parts had my eyes in a constant roll.

With that being said however, whenever the story was boring me to tears, I could just sit and look what was going on around the story. There was always something to look it, always something to fascinate me. Sigourney Weaver turned in a very decent performance and was the only actor in places to be able to rise above the dialogue Cameron gave them. However, there were times even she could not do it. Sam Worthington I feel was miscast, but he fits Cameron's niche for male leads, a la Arnold. I do believe this film will be showered with technical awards for its revolutionary technology and will get a Best Picture nomination at the Oscars in March. But, we must all remember that if you take away the visuals of this film, it is nothing more than a camp-fest that would go straight to DVD. With most of Cameron's previous movies they were much more layered beyond the visuals and special effects. I feel he got too caught up in wowing our eyes and completely forgot about what's behind them.


**1/2 out of ****
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
The last 10 minutes downgrade a great movie to a good movie
4 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
War of the Worlds was worth the price of paying the 8 bucks for a movie ticket for sure. The eye appealing visual effects, the great score of John Williams and the shock and awe of everything that was playing out in front of our eyes. Hell the acting of Tom Cruise was actually not bad. I was really into this movie and had read the ending is what takes out the steam and boy did it ever. I mean I know movies are supposed to be unrealistic but I mean come on Robbie parts ways with Rachel and his dad to fight the aliens and really theoretically should have died with everyone else. When Ray sees the outside after all the destruction no one and I mean no one is around. Then at the end go to where the mother and step dad are staying and the son just magically is there and we have this big hug and kiss reunion. Total garbage. Steven Spielberg directed the thing wonderfully but the screenplay was very very cheesy. Thankfully the rest of the movie was a fast paced, excitement filled epic.

What could have been a four star movie comes in with barely 3 ***
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
A letdown from the original two but still decent
2 July 2005
Batman Forever was the first Batman I ever saw so I really had nothing to compare it too when I first saw it in theatres on my 10th birthday :) and I loved it but you know I was young and just payed attention to the eye dazzling visuals and the comedic elements of the riddler and stuff like that. Now that I am older and have seen all of the Batman's several times I realize that Batman Forever while still decent was a major letdown from the previous two. Val Kilmer comes in and manages to pull off Batman but Bruce Wayne not so much. The chemistry with Nicole Kidman, wait a minute there was no chemistry. Nicole Kidman was awful in this movie and really was not needed. The best acting came from Jim Carrey who portrayed the insane and obsessive Edward Nygma/The Riddler but was a little over the top. Tommy Lee Jones was way over the top with his portrayal of Harvey Two Face. The show was much more lighter and humorous than the previous two but most likely because of a different directorial interpretation of Joel S. I still watch it from time to time and it keeps me entertained. Much more substance than story but still an OK watch.

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Batman Returns made the series
2 July 2005
Of all the four films in the Batman series (I say 4 because I truly do not include the new Batman Begins in that series) Batman Returns had the best story, plot, sub plots and best acting. Michael Keaton returned as a very respectable Batman and Bruce Wayne this time taking on the likes of the grotesque Pengiuin of the sewer played by Danny Devito. Christopher Walken effectively plays a very shrewed and borderline evil business man Max Schreck who will do anything, even kill to get what he wants. The there is Michelle Pfeiffer who plays nerdy, insecure Selina Kyle who is Max Schreck's assistant. Whe she stumbles on his huge devious plan he takes care of her and Catwoman, the best villain in the series is born. Michelle P stole the show for me as the very dark, seductive and sexy Catwoman. Selina Kyle and Bruce Wayne are attracted to one another and Batman and Catwoman are attracted to one another. The best subplot of the entire Batman series. Definitely is underrated here at IMDb IMO. It was one of the better films to come out of the 90's. I watch it over and over and never get tired of it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Batman Begins (2005)
Batman Begins redeems a series that I thought was unredeemable
1 July 2005
This film was probably the least hyped of the 5 Batman installments but I think that possibly played into its favor. It's a fresh new beginning for the franchise and its legions of fans. Appropriately titled, Batman Begins is a prequel to the very successful series of 4 films that were released over a course of 8 years. By the end of that series the state of it was not good. Batman & Robin was a joke compared to the 3 movies released prior. It had went from being a dark, brooding captivating thriller in the first two to a cartoonish poorly executed mess in Batman and Robin. Batman Begins regains the darkness that Batman began with effectively explaining how Bruce Wayne in fact took on his alter persona. Christian Bale plays the best Bruce Wayne yet as he is tormented by his parents death and is thirsty for justice to make sure what happened to him does not happen to anyone else. This was hinted in all of the previous 4 but never explored like it is here Liam Neeson who in fact is pretty much responsible for making Batman while in fact proves to be quite the enemy of both Bruce Wayne and Batman. With a stellar cast which wasn't used in its marketing like some of the other ones pull off in each role. Michael Caine was amazing as Alfred and Morgon Freeman as Fox, who is always good in any film he is in added a lot to the film as well. Go see Batman Begins you will not be disappointed.

**** out of four
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Captures the "Order" side of things quite well
22 April 2005
I have watched almost every episode of TBJ that has aired since it came on and I believe that has given me enough time to make a fair judgement on this show. I've liked it from the very first episode and one of the major reasons why I've liked it is because it focuses entirely on the order side of things. Now I know with a name Trial By Jury that is expected but it not only looks from the prosecutors point of view (which is all wee see on the other 3 L&O installments) but we also see it from the defence side of view too. Defence lawyers meeting with their clients, counseling them on their trials. It is very interesting. I give it 7/10 so far. It has held my interest and I look forward to seeing what else it can offer.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
One of the better movies from 2004
6 December 2004
This movie I have anticipated seeing ever since I was made aware it was being made about a year ago. Johnny Depp once again does not disappoint in this fantasy/drama that depicts how J.M Barrie came up with one of the most beloved plays of the 20th century. The story is so warm with Barrie making friends with a widow and her children but it is also contrasted with darkness as Barrie's marriage to his wife is falling apart. It becomes almost instantly clear that the marriage is in trouble when we see that they slee in separate bedrooms. 2004 has been so far a weak year for movies but it's ones like these that tend to brighten up the silver screen in time for Christmas. 4 out of 5 stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Best one in the L&O Franchise
18 November 2004
I have never one been that big of a fan of the original Law & Order. I would watch it for time to time and it was an alright show but never really had anything jump out at me to make it one of my can't miss shows. Then this show came on. I watched this show when it premiered back in 1999 and was impressed from the get go. Sure it followed the basic premise of it's original cousin but was much more loose on it's format and execution. Some episodes hardly ever involve the court room at all where the original week in week out follows a distinct pattern. First half hour is the law then the next is the order. This show although does sometimes follow the same pattern like i mentioned it is much more loose in how it executes it. Mariska Hartigay is excellent as her portrayal of Det. Olivia Benson. The whole cast as a whole is magnificent. Now I know a lot of people will disagree with me that this show is in no way better than the original but for me it is. It has given me something that the original never did.
129 out of 165 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Desperate Housewives (2004–2012)
Best New Show On T.V
10 November 2004
From the moment I saw previews for the upcoming t.v season at the end of this past summer I knew when I saw and heard about this show that it was special. The way the show is set up it just has endless possibilities for interesting story lines involving all of the shows characters. Each of them has a story to tell and you just can't wait for the next show to come on and tell you more about their stories. It has been set up perfectly so they aren't going to run out of interesting ideas for the future. The cast is excellent. The writing is brilliant and everything about this show makes it great. Desperate Housewives has become an overnight success, and I believe it has the makings of becoming a hit on t.v for years and years to come.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Who's the Boss? (1984–1992)
Good family comedy
27 September 2004
This was a good show. Although I never say it when it was still a regular series until the last season I've seen every episode in re runs and it is a very innocent humorous show. Katherine Helmond was the most interesting as Mona she could come out with one liners like that and Tony Danza and Judith Light also had their moments. It never quite got the praise it deserved however with really no major award wins in it's run. I thought it was much better than Golden Girls which was on at the same time and racked up them emmy's oh well that isn't always a barometer of true success. It was on for 9 seasons and was a considerable hit. Although not the best comedy to come out of that decade it was still fun to watch.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
The Practice (1997–2004)
A Show that will truly be missed
26 September 2004
I began watching "The Practice" the minute it began in March of 1997. I kept seeing ads for it before hand I thought this looks like it could be an interesting show. I liked Law and Order and I thought how perfect it would be to have a drama on that focused purely on the court room. I was proved right. The show was brilliant as are most of David e. kelly's undertakings. I fell in love with the story and the characters. For a show that debuted mid season, well no not even mid season 3 quarters through the season it amazingly was a hit. I continued watching the show regularly up until 2002 when I found the show had taken a sort of undesirable turn. For a brief period of time i became disinterested but when i heard that the cast had been completely overhauled for the 8th and what would be the final season i became interested again. The Practice became in it's 8th season what it was 4 or 5 years ago, the ebst legal drama on TV. James Spader saved the show.... sort of. He made it enjoyable to watch in it's final season and capped it off with an emmy win for best actor something Dylan mcdermott could never do. This show was very different from other court dramas and stood out from the rest to become the best of the 90's I am looking forward to Boston Legal the spin off and hope it continues where The Practice left off. The Practice, you will be missed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
One of the most interesting shows on T.V
25 September 2004
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation is by far one of the more interesting and intriguing dramas on the tube these days. Even though almost every episode follows the same pattern it is very different on how it is executed each week. It leaves you on the edge of your seat and as soon as you start watching you can't turn away. It helps that it has some very good acting performances, namely those of Marg Helgenberger. She i don't know how to explain it but just seems to have the role down pat. It's shame she has not been rewarded for her work as of yet. Hopefully someday. It is one of the best shows on TV right now possibly one of the best of the last 20 years and it's no surprise that it is the top rated show as well.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
A Roaring Rampage of Revenge!
21 May 2004
This movie is without a doubt one of the best revenge flicks ever made. Even though the story maybe very very simple it is perfectly executed with pure Tarintino style. The blood, the severed limbs, the limitless tributes by tarintino kung fu and western genres. He is a genius. I have to admit when I went to see this movie in the theatres I knew it was quite violet and bloody and I thought ugg am I gonna like this? But having liked every movie Quentin Tarintino has ever made... I managed to get there. Well I wasn't disappointed. From the opening scene in black in white with a savagely beaten woman in a wedding dress who we come to call "The Bride" with the very sassy and deep voice of David Carradine as Bill. The scene sets the stage for a hell of a ride that takes us from Pasadena California all the way to The House of Blue Leaves in Tokyo Japan. Now I may not be a pro movie critic but I know when I like something and this I definitely liked. The music was absolutely amazing. Even though hardly any of it original it is Quentin's way of paying homage to the films and genres he loved growing up as a kid. The cast was just amazing. Uma Thurman probably her best performence of her career. Darryl Hannah had like 5 mins of screen time and used it too it's full potential. I loved Volume 1 and I loved Volume 2 even more. 10/10 Quentin you are a movie genius and I can't thank you enough for your contributions to cinema.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Ok Now I see What I have Been Missing
16 January 2004
Since July everyone has been telling me you have to see pirates you have to see pirates. So i listened to them and rented it. I just finished watching it and now I see what I was missing. The action, the effects and the best performence of 2003 by Johnny Depp as Jack Sparrow which should get him an oscar nod. I stress the word should because it's highly unlikely but never the less he should. I was stunned how fast moving the story was it seemed to be quite fast for a 2 hr plus movie. The whole 2 hrs though was an exciting ride with thrills and chills. The effects could give Return of the King a run for there money I think. Anyway in one line AWESOME!!

4 out of 5 Stars.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Good On The Technical Side but the story....
8 December 2003
Ok I saw a preview for this film when I went to see Kill Bill: Vol. 1 and thought it looked like it would be worth my 10 bucks for a movie ticket.... well I kinda want my money back. The preview I saw showed lots of action and too me looked like a great movie filled with action and an interesting story. You know set in the times of Napolean, setting on a boat. I love movies that revolve around the ocean. So i went and saw it and by the end of the first hour I was completely disinterested. The only action in the movie was in the preview. The rest was just drawn out diolouge between Crowe and the rest of his shipmates. I rated this film 6 out of 10 because I know a good technical film when I see it and this one is one of them but the boring story is what kept it from getting any higher. Crowe had no emotion in this movie whatso ever and hope to god the academy does not nominate him for this. The only actor that i think should be nominated is Paul Bettany. His character was really the only one that interested me and kept me from falling asleep. Yes I do understand that the Academy likes these types of movies and probably will give this film a boatload of nominations (pardon the pun) but the only ones it deserves are technical ones and and perhaps Paul Bettany for supporting actor.

In Conclusion if you haven't seen this movie... wait till it comes out on video...
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Roseanne (1988–1997)
One of if not the best sitcom of the 1990's!
18 June 2003
I have been watching Roseanne since the early 90's and I still cannot get enough of it. The humour of Roseanne and all the characters always gets me. It seemed that every episode had it's hilarious parts. One of the reasons I enjoy Roseanne so much is it's reality it's got. It's probably the most real sitcom ever created which is why it was so popular. A couple with 3 kids in a small Illinois town always trying to make ends meet no matter what challenges they are faced with. They have one daughter that drops out of high school and marries and another who ends up getting pregnant before she hits 20 and marries also. Those things happen to real families and Roseanne made it happen to the t.v family for the first time. Roseanne tackled all the issues other tv shows wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole such as homosexuality, abuse, and of course sex and birth control. These were all recurring topics. I love Roseanne and still watch the re-runs whenever I can. I always thought it was a shame the series had to go off. Seasons 1-6 were the best but after that it got weird. It stopped being about the family and more about other stuff. The lottery is what killed the show however I found the ending weird but yet interesting. Roseanne is and will always be one of the most crowning achievements in Prime time T.V. Hats off to the team ar Carsey and Werner that created the show. You truly have a masterpiece.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this