Reviews written by registered user
|42 reviews in total|
How on earth is this such a boring 'drama'?! The writers had the
irresistible backdrop of Nazi-occupied London and licence to create any
related storyline that they could conjure.
So how have we ended up with this dried up, bumbling series of uninteresting scenes? I cannot be alone on not giving a monkey's about what is happening.
Nothing is remotely 'dramatic' about any of it - not even accidentally. It's embarrassing.
Incredibly, it actually combines the worst aspects of different genres: We've got the moronic, boring waffling of Big Brother AND poorly made, low-budget, story-free zombie stuff.
At least actual Big Brother features 'genuine' morons.
While Im putting the boot into this rubbish: the 'army voice-overs' sound like the stilted scripting of a 1990s video game.
Low production values is not necessarily a death-blow but this not only looks like a 3rd year drama project, it is unforgivably dull.
(Imdb want more lines, but I think you get the idea...)
The subject matter is fascinating so it was bitterly disappointing to
have it thrown away on a pompous twerp like Alex Polizzi. She starts in
Venice and spends the first few minutes putting the boot into tourists
that dare to show up! It really was quite embarrassing to watch her
look down her nose at visitors and bemoan the fact that Venice draws a
crowd. Years ago, Fry and Laurie did a superb sketch about
pseudo-intellectual snobs discussing 'our Venice'. It all sounds
precisely like that.
The whole thing is thoroughly spoiled by a terrible choice of presenter. Oh, and is it really a 'secret' that if you "open your wallet wide" you can stay in very expensive hotels? Do me a favour.
I could just about put up with the usual Hollywood nonsense of
Americans playing non-American heroes but... When English actor Mark
Strong turned up and actually PUT ON an American accent to play a Roman
soldier I had to draw the line. The story is interesting but, in the
hands of Hollywood, it holds the faint stink of yet more American
Whichever way you cut it, the film really does seem to be suggesting that Americans pulled off the heroics of a people that existed long before the US was even a country. It's all just faintly embarrassing. Im sure that the vast majority of Americans would be very happy to watch characters being played by non-Americans but the money men of Hollywood insist of making an extra 3 dollars by casting the likes of Channing Tatum to play Latin-speaking Italians. It's ridiculous.
Not a shred of the original charm remains. It's an animated corpse of a
film. Talking of which, what the devil happened to Sean Patrick's
face?! Between his plastic surgery and moronic ranting he looks vaguely
Basically, scenes from the original 'Boondock Saints' are remade into stilted, feeble replicas. It's witless, poorly written and desperate.
If you loved the original (and I did) please do yourself a favour, resist the temptation and avoid this mess. At least that way, the magic of the first film will remain untarnished in your memory!
(Imdb want more lines, so Im padding.)
A pretty disappointing start. The presentation of our 'hero' is a right
mess. We're lead to believe he is dangerous and sexually threatening
(which he is, it turns out!). It's confusing for the audience because
our 'heroine' is clearly fearful of him. So she should be: he can
destroy her and her family on a whim and he is also responsible for the
death of her husband. When they meet she is desperate to secure her
family's heritage while he is just desperate to have sex with her. And
then later he tries to rape her. And yet... she suddenly declares her
burning, undying love for him.
The audience is entitled to feel a little uneasy at this bizarre turn of events. Oh and there's magic too. Which seems a bit odd.
Then we meet the 'villains' but, to tell you the truth, I didn't dislike them more than I already disliked our leading couple. There just isn't anything likable about the pair of them. Shame too because I would loved to have enjoyed a historical thriller in the same vein as The Tudors. Unfortunately, this ain't it.
Nothing wrong with extreme violence and gore in films, I reckon, but
it's always a bit embarrassing when films like this pretend that
they're oh-so-much-more than just a bunch of maniacs chopping each
Started off well but turned into a waste of time. The three acts / directors novelty doesn't work. It only has the effect of creating a disjointed and clumsily connected story.
Comedy in horror is extremely difficult to do. The Evil Dead series got it right; George Romero got it right. This load of old toot is just boring.
Black comedy is a tricky one to get right - and this mess doesn't get
close to funny.
The comedy element is feeble and the comic element is further diluted by inexplicable attempts at dramatic sequences. It's hard to imagine the makers nodding enthusiastically at the so-called jokes and agreeing that this was the best they could come up with.
Simon Pegg has been in some fantastic films (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz) but it looks like he can't cut it without Edgar Wright.
This travesty scores a 1 for me because on top of being embarrassingly unfunny, the subject matter is the real-life story of serial killers who murdered elderly people - er, hilarious.
Yeah, its been made with sincere enough intentions but it's b0llocks.
Everyone over-acting like their lives were at stake. It's all a bit
embarrassing. The characterisation is non-existent - you just don't
give a sh*t about anyone and this is a big mistake in a zombie flick.
Some of the set ups had potential but it's all just too amateurish.
IMDb wants me to add more lines but I don't really have anything else to add.
Apparently I still haven't added enough lines - hence this line.
And this one.
As a glossy, moving tribute to the men that served, it works very well.
No-one could doubt the individual acts of heroism and brotherhood
scattered throughout the war. But surely the makers owe these guys a
balanced representation of the bigger picture?
The tribute is diminished somewhat by the unnecessary pro-American overkill. So we are treated to faceless Germans behaving like the Marx brothers and Brits lazily portrayed as incompetent footnotes to history. Even the European resistance fighters are treated with faint disdain. Issues such as the US's non-involvement during the first few years of the war and the massive British/ non-American losses are either ignored or tagged on as a magnanimous after-thought, at the end of the episode.
I suppose what Im saying is, where is the respect? Plenty for the square-jawed, handsome good-guys (ie. Americans) but not an awful lot left over for anyone else... I'm not sure what the genuine good-guys would have made of that.
|Page 1 of 5:||    |