Change Your Image
Upload An Image
Crop And Save
I am writing this to just say if you love dystopia and sci-fi this is the movie to go watch before you die. I am simply enthralled and it is as I always like my entertainment to be, start slowly, gradually build up and bam like an orgasm it ends. It is one of the finest movies made in the history. But as many people who went with me couldn't comprehend the sheer genius of the filmmaker and the space time complexity so if you are one of them that don't want to understand and just want something happening that doesn't utilize your neurons then I guess don't watch it. To say the least, if I were a girl I would let Fukasakus' brain do it with me any time.
Sci-fi: The Difficult One.
Sci-fi is a difficult genre. The reason is, that most of the sci-fi movies are very effect driven, so that might become problem, if the movie has nothing else to offer besides the effects: bad plot makes clunky effects look even sillier. Very few sci-fi movies have managed to keep the charm and awe of movies like Metropolis, which manages to look good even todays standards.
Interstellar is a bit of a mixed bag. Most of the sets look very good. The interiors of the space ship look nice and futuristic without looking silly, the space suit design is very clever, the acting is good and the plot is, while not the greatest thing ever written, relatively well executed. I will admit that maybe - MAYBE - I felt a bit cheated seeing this in a theater.
But what is very disappointing in the movie are the exterior shots of the space ships. They look cheap and the ship design is ridiculous with its box shapes and flying saucer shaped shuttles. I wasn't very positively surprised by the music either, which tries too hard to sound like futuristic tech noise.
I would still say it is okay to watch with "Mystery Science Theater" jokes, but really, overall, I could not find value in this film. At best, you should watch this movie so you can scratch your head in wonder. Otherwise, there is really no reason to see this... It's not Sci-Fi, it's not even Horror. Perhaps it's a comedy, in which case, it deserves a 2 out of 10. It may be wise to just wait for the parody because there is lots of room to rip on this movie.
The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014)
I actually prefer It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World - but sure, it was the original. I've gotta say though that this one wasn't bad either. Many of the scenes were really funny and I thought it was a worthy effort.
The only thing that bothered me apart from the main bulk of the film, was the ending, which was so unbelievably bogus and corny, I felt like I was gonna gag. That part seemed like it was written by Anne Landers or Aunt Bee, or some other old lady, ruining the whole wacky Bundy-type image of the movie. I really thought Bill Murray would have had more class than to be involved like that. I'd be willing to bet he wasn't happy about it.
I recommend this movie for all those who enjoy ultra-mild comedy, but just leave the theater before it ends! Of course you won't...not knowing how it ends would be even worse than hating the ending.
A solid 3 out of 10 stars.
Defecates All Over Tolkien's Grave
Its based on the Hobbing but the film is good Peter Jackson finally proved he can make all movie for any child , romantic , and really politically correct so once again two cheers to the director Peter Jackson. Go watch this with all family and kids because this film is for them is for they'r kinda age and its basically not bad.
The last film from Peter Jackson, "The Lovely Bones," had sent shivers down my spine and made me think that this company had finally run itself into the ground result was that it was a massive flop. But with this one, I have managed to regain some faith in the films that Jackson is now releasing. It is a great family movie, good for the holiday season, and some people might even need a hankie. But take it for what it is, a fun movie, enjoyable with the nerd-set.
Peter Jackson, the director follows his own passion of influences despite strong objections from the actual Tolkien estate. What The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey could have done without, are certain inappropriate extra characters not found in the original tale, bringing to mind instead George Lucas's Phantom Menace. Also the film overstays its welcome when it drudges on for a good 15 minutes after the dwarfs have resolved their issues with Bilbo. The romantic track between certain humans with newly added female members of their species seems obligatory at best, and it doesn't help that Gandalf and Baggins have zero chemistry together. I think this was deliberately done by Jackson's camp.
The weakest section of the movie is its music by Howard Shore. It's one of the most unimpressive work from the maestro with not even a single melodious song. This project needed some special children songs which were found missing. Special Effects are uncomplicated and are not used in excess, which is intelligent thinking by the director. Why 27 animals were killed offhand by the film crew yet goes unexplained, but nevermind that when there is Hobbit fun to had, right? All one can say is that its an OK movie, with a simple look and has nothing special to talk about. Something extraordinary was expected from Peter Jackson but sadly it was not there.
The fact that aspiring actors, directors, and writers can't find work while this crap is produced is absolutely appalling.
*Disclaimer: I only watched this movie as a conditional agreement. And I see films for free. I wouldn't be caught dead giving my hard earned money to these idiots.
Well, to explain the depth of this 'film', I could write my shortest review, ever. Don't see this movie. It is by far the stupidest, lamest, most lazy, and unbelievably UNFUNNY movie I have ever seen. It is a total disaster. But since my hatred for this movie, and the others like it, extends far beyond one viewing, I think I'll go on for a bit.
I don't know any of the people in the movie besides Samantha Thomson, David Sullivan, and Shane Carruth, but it doesn't matter. They're all horrible, though I think that was the point. The editing is flat out horrible, and possibly blatant continuity errors make this crapfast even crappier than I thought it would be. Now I know that these films are not supposed to be serious at all, but come on, it's film-making 101 that if someone gets a minor facial cut, it should be there in the next shot. AND, if someone gets cut by a sword, there should be blood and at least a cut (though since the Narnia films "get away with it", I'll give Primer a pass here).
The 'jokes' are thoughtless and mindless physical gags that obviously take after some of the most popular movies of the last year (there's some from late 2001 as well, including 2 of our 5 Best Picture nominees).
You know what the saddest thing about these stupid movies are? I don't care how much money they make, or how many cameos they have, these sorry ass excuses for films are taking away jobs from actors, writers, and directors that truly deserve the attention. Lionsgate, I thought you had better taste than this. You should be ashamed of yourselves for making this kind of crap. And as for Shane Carruth? Burn in hell. You guys are contributing to the decline of western civilization. Correction...you are the CAUSE of the downfall of western civilization.
Kick-Ass 2 (2013)
...this movie is just...I wish I could sue someone. I would sue the users of IMDb for rating it higher than a 2. Its not badly made but the story should be taken out and shot.
I never comment or rate movies, but this one was so bad that I had to come warn the world...
It is just nonsense about some guys and a girl who really have never have a story written about. Writers should worry about showing people the great things in life, this movie had none of that.
Don Jon (2013)
I feel like I got fooled by the fake reviews
Some people writing reviews here deny that Joseph Gordon-Levitt was this sleazy. I didn't know Joseph Gordon-Levitt, but I know someone who idolized Joseph Gordon-Levitt. He was a lot like Joseph Gordon-Levitt in many ways. For instance, he bought the entire collection of "Hogan's Heroes" tapes - with my money. He spent his life pretending to be a great person, but did very little with his life, wasted his opportunities and alienated all his friends. I saw "Don Jon" at a late show, midweek, and I was absolutely alone in the theatre. It was the creepiest theatre experience of my life, compounded by the similarities between Joseph Gordon-Levitt and my friend. There was no respite from watching Joseph Gordon-Levitt's Jon march towards destruction - no way to miss his inability to see anything in life beyond the next sexual encounter or the next videotape. For those poor fools who think that hacking up teenagers or seeing women mutilated is the essence of horror, they're missing the boat. "Don Jon" is a genuine horror film, and most people don't have the courage to face it.
This Is the End (2013)
waste of time and money.
I love funny movies, and also disaster movies, but to be honest, this is a terrible movie. This Is the End is based on a good idea, and it has potential to be a hit.However, writers and director lacks imagination, and they didn't check their papers for coherence. This is again one of those movies where i think a little tweaking of the plot,a little more thought put into character development,a little more responsive acting by the actors could have made this movie better.
My imagination went wild hearing the concept of the story.I began to fantasize a about a disaster movies that was actually funny.I know it sounds cliché but when you throw in the fact that there was a disaster movies that was actually funny Sadly the writers couldn't do much justice to a potential story.I didn't understand whether the film tried too hard or was a half hearted effort.The most obvious flaw was the mediocre acting.( There's laughing in my head).It made these dorks look like a complete confused fools.It could have been filmed in a dingy basement with matte backdrops of scenery and some computer generated imagery..Also the storyline seemed like being taken out from a daytime action from cartoon network.No character development,no stress on the story and the concept,and no concern whatsoever of audience's expectations makes this one a mediocre movie.It could have been but was simply not impressive
World War Z (2013)
Blows Major Chunkage
I literally felt like booing at the end of this film. It was a complete waste of time and money. They spent a fortune advertising this picture and obviously hoped the "star power" of the actors would be enough to carry the film. It isn't (and I like Brad Pitt a lot).
I agree with the other commenter in that there wasn't nearly enough time devoted to character development. This is one of a very small number of films that I could not sit through. Sold on its special effects, which aren't that impressive by todays standards to be honest, the film has absolutely nothing else to offer. Alaborious, convoluted plot and terrible acting mean that this film is literally a collection of images on screen featuring the worst type of acting.
I disagree with the comment that the film was even mildly entertaining. I was almost angry with the way the movie ended.
Is it too late to boo? Please don't make a sequel...
Terrible casting. The dialogue was morose;
Movies weren't made for cats and dogs -- they were made to show camels. Seriously, try sitting through a nanosecond of these monumentally hairy guys have drifted into your life after the new Garfield . We heard that National Geographic was involved with this film, so expected some first-class photography. We were disappointed....Dumb plot...dumb characters....just all stupid...
OK, I admit that I watched this movie. But thankfully I watched it on a pirate DVD bought for two dollars from a dodgy looking bloke on Sadovaya Triumfalnaya in Moscow.
The film's plot is ludicrously predictable to, as it couldn't be more blatantly obvious that the sickly sweet Jenifer Love Hewitt and her dim witted fiancé Tom are going to get engaged at the end of the film - this shows just how cliché ridden this dross is. Even Billy Connoly fails to raise a laugh as a 'mouse-hunt' style cretin who can't even kill an overweight camel. This is cinema at it's most ridiculous it has to be said.
The thing we can be thankful for is that the film is set in upper Mongolia, which provides a classy backdrop to what is such a boring film with very little identity. So, go and see Geschichte vom weinenden Kamel if you've got kids and are at a loose end this Summer, but don't moan when it doesn't fur fill you're expectations - just tell yourself it's going to be crap like myself and my friends did.
It is bad enough to rip off most of Mark Twain's Prince and the Pauper content, but where Mark Twain was tweaking the noses of the British (a popular theme during his time), the script writer were tweaking the noses of the American viewers. Stereotyping British upper class has become so passe that it has become insulting to viewers on both sides of the "pond," as well as the weak-kneed Willy who can't ask the woman he loves to marry him, whom, by the way, is too caught up with her own world to listen.