Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
way, way more than "decent"
10 September 2005
I just had to write something when I saw that the current spotlighted user's comment calls this movie merely "decent." I just got back from seeing it on the big screen, and believe me, it's WAY more than "decent." More like amazing. I am truly grateful to have had the opportunity to see it. I'll be the first to admit that it's at times narratively challenging, and that the main character is fairly one-note. But it really compares in many respects with classic westerns like The Searchers. Plus a truly inventive, exciting, and striking climax. Full of visual poetry. Ten lines really does seem like a bit much to require people to write. Would six be so awful? All I really wanted to do was provide some balance to the "decent" comment. Wow. I'm still just at nine lines. Okay. See this on the big screen if you have a chance. It's truly a widescreen picture that uses the frame quite inventively at times. And that's eleven lines, so I'm done.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fah (1998)
1/10
nasty
28 November 2002
An hour and a half of innocent people getting shot by machine gun. Mindless, bloody, and vile. And frequently not even coherent. An idiotic waste of time and money, fetishizing violence on a massive scale.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed