Reviews written by registered user
|319 reviews in total|
Jericho has a fantastic premise: the result of a nuclear Armageddon on
a small Kansas town.
Unfortunately, the show can be melodramatic in its romance plots and in after school special moments such as the broken-hearted teenager who always does the right thing, with too soulful and heavy handed music. Being understated is best.
On top of that, the ensemble cast has nearly 20 main characters, so we don't get to know any of them well. The plots are necessarily shallow. For characters to make choices that seem realistic, we need to get to know their motivations and goals. For this reason it is not nearly as interesting as The Walking Dead.
On the positive side, Jericho does not have the trap that Deadwood had, the Old West TV show. Deadwood never seemed to go anywhere. The characters didn't have clear goals and a high-level direction. In Jericho you always know what the town and individuals goals are scene to scene.
It's worth watching, just not the best. My trick? I fast forward through the lingering looks.
Having heard good things about the strength of Big Bang Theory's
writing, I am sorry to say that I immediately hated the show.
Rather than having an intelligent plot with character depth, they seem to wander wherever they need to, to drop in one-liners. For example, their friend may have a peanut allergy in Season 1, Episode 2, but they joke about it even though it may be life-threatening. Having a medical receptionist tell them to wait in Season 1, Episode 1 so that she can work on her crossword puzzle is also out of character -- something she'd be fired for -- and was clearly dropped in so that the geeks could solve it and show their intelligence.
The acting and awkward pauses for audience laughter seem forced. All this I get from the first 100 seconds of episodes 1 and 2. It is easy for me to conclude that the show lacks story, and with its laugh track (I don't care whether it's live or recorded) it seems like a throwback compared to shows like Modern Family, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Extras, and Community. I recommend these shows to you highly.
My intuition is that this is not a show for intelligent people who might playfully call themselves geeks. This is a show for the butt-heads who may lack refinement but like to laugh at what they think a geek is.
It's not hard to put together a monster film. You throw one insane guy
together with a hero, and add a car chase. The Ledge is nothing like
this, and that's why it's so impressive.
The main struggle is between a Christian with extreme beliefs, and an Atheist who just wants out. Uniquely, it's the only film I can think of that has an openly atheist hero and an A-list cast. And ironically, the few people who have complained about this show exactly what the film is trying to portray: that some people are so intolerant of atheism that even one movie among the thousands in history is too much for them.
To me, the star of this film is Patrick Wilson, who plays the fundamentalist. Instead of becoming a monster, his portrayal links completely normal passions like love and protection and revenge that we can all identify with, but then takes it to the natural conclusion, egged on by his convictions that anything he decides to do must be blessed.
Thus the central thesis of the film -- that belief can go too far -- is played out on a small stage. This is a drama of just 6 people, but the intricate explosions between them pull at the heartstrings far more effectively than a car chase in an action film would. We hear so much about the dangers of religion in big stories like 9-11, gay rights, and abortion rights. Here is a film about the dangerous of religion in the everyday, the dramas so commonplace that everyone who watches can find something in their own lives to compare it with.
Sure, I've never walked out onto The Ledge. But something about the masterful writing and acting in this film creates an authenticity that is undeniable.
Go ahead. Rant against atheism. Show us how intolerant you are. Violent words and deeds are the response of someone backed into a corner, desperate not to lose it all, just like "Joe" is in this film.
I'm tired of horror films that shock you with trick camera cuts or lots
of blood and gore. To me, the intellectual thrillers are the best, like
Silence of the Lambs, or the works of H.P. Lovecraft and Edgar Allan
I'm aware that it's a minority opinion, but I really enjoyed the film and I would urge you to overlook the huge fans of the original. Fans are a strange bunch. They have such nostalgia for the past that they can't see that the quality of movies have improved vastly in 40 years. Instead of celebrating the attention that a remake (of whatever quality) brings to the original, of course they can't help themselves in a frenzy of shredding it because their favorite plot points are gone.
My, my. Aren't we serious.
I've seen both versions and to me the remake is superior. The production quality is higher, as reflected in the costumes and visual and sound quality.
Also, the "Christians as victims" theme has been removed, leaving, to me, a purer, distilled theme: that humans can do unimaginable things to each other. Of course, it's horrific because it's also true. Humans did create the Nazis. We do create cults.
The plot is tighter, with fewer lags for exposition, and the nudity in the original is really unnecessary.
To me it was spookier than The Island of Dr. Moreau. And the original is great too. I think we should support them both and stop being such whiners.
I give The Wicker Man (2006) an 8 out of 10 and if you're looking for just one good review to encourage you to give this film a try, you have found it! :)
Johnny Monsarrat Consulting. All content by Jon Monsarrat!
I've just seen a preview of True Grit and could not speak more highly
of the film. I'm not much for Westerns because I have no fondness for
the prairie or animals, but this one is an exception.
The story focuses on a 14-year-old girl whose father has been murdered. She wants justice and she goes at it with both barrels, drawing in two bounty hunters and several criminals into a scheme that spirals up and out of control. Although the characters showing true grit are deadly serious, the film has laugh-out-loud humor that keeps it from going so over the top as to be unbelievable. The girl performs several heroic deeds that show her mettle but do not swerve into "superhero" territory -- there is nothing goofy or "kids movie" about the film.
Each of the traditional Western themes is given an original twist. There's no face off at 20 paces to the film, and the action scenes if anything add to its veracity instead of being a draw away from it.
Redemption, justice, vengeance, bravery, holy mother of God, with Oscar bait performances by Jeff Bridges and Hailee Steinfeld. If you do not see True Grit when it hits the theatres on the big screen, you will regret it.
I'm forced to say I just didn't "get" or enjoy Rebecca at all. I'm
Our male hero alternates between making his love interest cry and heckling her for trying to please him. He proposes by mentioning it in a flippant and sort of insulting manner from the next room. Our female hero tries so hard to please everyone that she's constantly excusing herself and breaking down.
Sure, people like this exist in the real world. But this is not a Leaving Las Vegas story of crippled people... it's portrayed as a true love story. I find it sickening. These days, we look up to strong women, and we certainly don't want people (of any gender) constantly saying thing that are mean.
To add on top of this, I didn't feel any chemistry between the characters... declaring their love felt quite sudden, I didn't feel any real chemistry about the hero's angst about his dead wife... the whole film just seemed contrived. The scenes where the heroine isn't quite ready for rich living become repetitive, like beating a dead horse. It would feel preachy if only there were some message to preach. Finally, I'm sorry to say it, but cinematography and things like color have been in films for a long time now.
This film left me even more confused than Chasing Amy and I couldn't get all the way through it. I can see from other people's reviews that a murder mystery eventually surfaces. But hey, I did get an hour into the film without a hint of tension so I guess that all happens later. I'm forced to give it a 3 out of 10.
So World War II, the biggest event of the century, just ended and the
best film topic they had was a fictional mutiny on an tow ship that
does nothing? You couldn't find any compelling real-life stories, eh?
Tsk tsk. This courtroom drama could be interesting if the viewers are kept in doubt as to the guilt or innocence of the accused, for example in 12 Angry Men (1957). But the first half of the film demonstrates it clearly, at a very slow pace. Humphrey Bogart, the subject of the mutiny, doesn't even come onto the ship for 30 minutes.
Then, he's supposed to be crazy but the way it's dramatized and acted just isn't that thrilling. Even the scene where they might lose the ship itself somehow is underdone, lacking the witty dialogue and tension of, for example, the mutinies in Crimson Tide (1995) or Star Trek (2009).
The courtroom scenes are pretty lackluster as well. The actors involved don't seem to get very heated and that communicates. The romantic side plot adds nothing. The side plot with Fred MacMurray is supposed to be a shocker but is both telegraphed beforehand and brushed off as nothing afterwards. Also, I'm sorry to say it, but thrillers and special effects have come a long way in 60 years. The film shows its age.
I would give the film a watchable 5 or 6 if it weren't for the preachy tone at the end. I won't spoil the ending for you, but the verbal sparring about incompetency vs. mental illness vs. duty vs. showing respect for those who sacrificed just didn't move me. (That being said, the high point of the film with Bogart's speech was dead on.)
I'm forced to give The Caine Mutiny an unwatchable 4 out of 10, sort of a bonus 5 for failing to do a WWII story that's in any way relevant or actual.
Yankee Doodle Dandy was made in the last decade before rock and roll
and when vaudeville had barely left the stage. I've got no problem with
musicals: I love Singing in the Rain and The Sound of Music, for
But I just wasn't captivated by the music of Yankee Doodle Dandy. They repeat all the songs two or three times, James Cagney tends to "speak sing" too much, and the production value... well, this isn't Chicago (2002).
That might have been excused. Unfortunately, the main character is egotistical and unlikeable. Of course, that's his character flaw. But I found myself unable to root much for him. I understand that this is a true story of a real person, but the rags to riches concept works so much better when the hero is a good guy. In addition, the story doesn't flow along easily. The story covers twenty years and the plot seems like an excuse to tack together pieces of musical productions the main hero is involved with. There's little character depth, and while there's humor... it's not chock full of humor. It's really showing its age, and even includes whites performing in black face and corporal punishment of children.
It's supposed to be one of the best musicals of all time. But I guess this is one of those classics that only film school or musical theatre majors can love. Even the music isn't fresh, as it is drawn from George Cohan's previous shows.
I'll give Yankee Doodle Dandy a disappointing 5 out of 10.
I'm a guy who prefers action movies and not quite the romantic comedy
type, so I wasn't expecting much from She's Out of My League from the
trailers, and the oddly touched up movie poster that leaves Jay
Baruchel looking not quite human. However, I was surprised to find it
an enjoyable comedy.
The film centers around Kirk Kettner (Jay Baruchel) a man with self- esteem problems whom a dream girl (Alice Eve) fancies. I never really felt the chemistry between the two leads since the premise -- his anxiety -- kept getting in the way. In fact the premise is sort of beaten to death, making the film a little repetitive. I'm reminder of the film Forgetting Sarah Marshall, in which the premise is that a couple breaks up and runs into each other. But after a half hour, the film goes in new directions. She's Out of My League never escapes its premise. That being said, the supporting cast are all given something real to do and characterizations that are mostly real. I was particularly amused by T.J. Miller's performance as the best guy friend.
There's some original toilet humor and plenty of laugh out loud moments, especially those involving Kirk's family. However, plenty of moments flop as well, such as picking a fight in a bowling alley. Alice Eve played her role a little too straight, in my opinion, unlike her best girl friend, played by Krysten Ritter, who was just wacky enough to keep the comedic momentum going. Do you know what I'm talking about? If the pain and conflict that keep plot tension going are a little too real, it's not as comedic. I'm thinking of the films "Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers" in which the characters are all a little batty and we can tell that any conflict is cartoony and not going to lead to real pain.
That being said, the film has a phenomenal ending, and this is why you should go to see it. Everyone's felt the frustration of flying through airport security and the film ends with a power fantasy of circumventing that, in a harmless way that involves the entire cast of supporting characters. It's even better than the airport ending of "Love, Actually."
So yes, if your girlfriend wants to take you to see this, go! It's a solid comedy, not one for the ages, but worth your time.
I'll give She's Out of My League a respectable 7 out of 10.
The Crazies is a remake of a film that was once original, but these
days zombie films are a dime a dozen. Does The Crazies stand out?
I felt it to be a solid film but one that did not come across as overly original. However, just when I was thinking, "this is going to be pretty formulaic", there was a plot twist involving outsiders that changed the entire nature of the film. Unfortunately, this new premise was never explored or explained fully enough to build tension. If we don't know what the protagonists are fighting against, and therefore what their goal is, how much can we root for them?
Although people have called this film a commentary on environmental damage and pollutants -- the thing that causes the Zombies -- isn't fleshed out enough to be a real talking point of the film. Anger and fear of the government don't constitute political commentary, I'm sorry. Also, there's confusion as to whether it's really a pollutant or more like a virus that is contagious. If it's contagious, it is a good thing that the protagonists want to escape the zombies and possibly infect the world?
To its credit, there is plenty of action, and the action sequences play into the drama. There's some random violence, but most of the conflicts build character development and push the characters even further into terror and desperation. The film also avoids superhuman stunts. There's no MacGuyver or Keanu Reaves type in the film who knows exactly what to do and makes the film too campy to be scary.
That being said, the action scenes aren't overly original. And the power of the big bang ending is wasted, neither being adequately built up nor adequately used as an obstacle to be overcome. The tension in the scene of crossing the highway is sort of wasted as well. And I do wish movieland people driving dangerously would fasten their seat belts.
All in all, The Crazies is a solid film that really did give me a nightmare. I'll give it a respectable but not classic 7 out of 10.
|Page 1 of 32:||          |