Reviews written by registered user
|11 reviews in total|
In short, a very interesting movie. Why?
1) Good combination of different genres (comedy, thriller, mystery, romance,
drama, documentary etc.).
2) Good acting
3) Good music (Nina Simone enchants)
4) Interesting story (real life, depth, actuality)
OK, I understand some critics related to this movie. Most are true but still, the movie leaves its mark when you leave the cinema.
The movie has some strong similarities with the directing and films of John Sayles (see Long Star, Men with Guns etc.). Great that there are more Sayles like directors around these days.
Looking forward to the other upcoming Malkovich movies!
This movie doesn't live up to the hype at all. Ok, the scenes are
beautifully shot, the martial arts are great, the music is very good, the
references are interesting BUT....the story is very thin and the violence is
really over the top. Maybe people are desensitized and need this kind of
violence to feel again. I feel sorry for that. Is it necessary to show it to
underscore the enormous anger and revenge of the leading character? I don't
I prefer Reservoir Dogs en Pulp Fiction....less shallow and more complete.
One of the most provocative and original movies in 2002 (for me though). Not
the best but definitely one to watch. Why?
1) It arouses lots of emotions
2) Good acting and directing
3) It shows the fragility of life, of the very very small difference between
white and light on the one hand (referring to the final scene in the movie)
and black and darkness on the other hand (referring to the first scenes and
the nightlife). This juxtaposition of light and darkness epitomises in the
final shot in which we see only a flashing strobo light. This light shows
the fragility of life for me. Time can destroy some lives in less than a
4) It is about human nature indeed: the positive and the negative combined.
It is about normal human beings getting lost in their pain and anger. Shown
in a disturbed camera style like in the movie Sombre.
5) It also shows the delicate and subtle between love and hate as Marcus
says and does almost the same things to his girl Alex as does the rapist.
This is what is so striking in this movie.
5) The role of fate and (profetic) dreams.
OK, the story is quite simple but the details and the effects of the storystelling are convincing for me. Indeed, I would rate it a 9/10.
By the way, time destroys everything might refer to the second law of thermodynamics in physics :-) Entropy increases with time, this is certainly the case in this movie.
Just saw the first seven seasons in a row... Interesting tv serie but it
lacks some originality as it easy borrows material from films and series
like 'V' (many aspects), Twilight Zone (quite some episodes), Twin Peaks
(conspiracy, supernatural events, hidden agendas), James Bond (Q -> Lone
Gunmen), Speed ('Drive'), Groundhog Day ('Monday') and others.
The strength of the serie is in: - the good combination of proven successful stories and concepts (see above) - effective combination of one time stories and underlying, holistic episodes
Personally, I prefer the holistic episodes as they are more intriguing, complex and dynamic.
It is sad that the latter seasons are less exciting than the first seasons.
Great movie. It grabs you from the start, exciting...a bit obvious at some
moments, lots of symbolism, power plays and psychological projections. I
the movie on video, but I believe this one is definitely one for the big
screen. It is enchanting. The end of the movie is a little bit farfetched
and overdone (unlike the better Tierra, Los Amantes and Sex and Lucia (my
personal favorite)) but this is only a minor comment.
Great to know that Medem will be delivering more inspiring movies :-)))
9 out of 10.
Personally I believe this movie is a ripoff relative to the original movie.
The original was great, amazing and engaging. Additionally, the acting and
music was much better than in Vanilla Sky (except for 2 Radiohead songs
which embody the weirdness and disconnectedness of the movie). Tom Cruise en
Penelope Cruz just aren't convincing in this movie. Also, after the
Hollywoodization of the original we can witness more explicit explanations,
more sentimental notions, more patriotic ideas and more cliches. The mystery
of the movie has been minimized for the masses.
Interesting movie (especially for 1973) but not a classic. Good acting,
decors, humor and symbolism. A movie about solitude, emptiness,
disconnectedness, decadence, longing and escapism (sex,
Personally I believe that Panic Room is less complex and developed relative
to Fight Club and Seven. I must admit that it is a interesting story (at
least in the beginning) with enough 'scare-potential' and the FX and
direction are great. Main issues for me though are:
- Shallow story (no reference to eternal or sociatal issues)
- Story becomes predictable and a drag at some moments in the film
- Not a memorable experience like Seven or Fight Club, it is more like bubblegum
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Personally I believe this is a great movie. Not shallow at all as some
reviewers say. Why? Because it deepens the relevance of constructivism in
real and future life. Because it is about dealing with the past and karma
a reasonably subtle way (the end should have been a bit less explicit I
The main character is shallow and goes insane (and stays insane....in all further virtual deaths and reincarnations). It is only so because his inner soul is rotten and is not dealt with. Salvation will be there only if he accepts true friendship, love and hope. Otherwise he stays shattered and searching for (unreal) happiness.
Open your eyes is a multi-layered description of this movie. Open your eyes concerning your own past, concerning the role and influence of media (and false promises) and concerning the (positive and negative) interpretations all of us make everyday. Therefore, I enjoyed this movie in a spiritual way.
People who love this movie, I strongly recommend films from directors Medem (Tierra, Los Amantes and above all Sex and Lucia) as well as Almodovar (Live Flesh, Todo Sobre mi Madre).
9/10 - memorable plot and movie. Unfortunately, the enchantment within the movie was lacking or minimalistic. Can't have it all right? ;-))
After seeing all the reviews, I must say that my opinion is mixed. On the
one hand, the plot and concept of the movie are very interesting and
surprising. On the other hand, the form and style of this movie are blurry
and slow/repetitive at certain moments. It is true that this movie needs
been seen at least twice to fully appreciate its intricacies. It's a
thing and somehow it is a combination of Miikie Takashi's Visitor Q, Seven
and Silence of the Lambs.
Overall, I would say 7/10.
I would recommend Frailty (2001) from Bill Paxton to people who like this plot.
|Page 1 of 2:|| |