Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Mad Men: Signal 30 (2012)
Season 5, Episode 5
9/10
Multi-faceted episode with great ending.
6 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Like at least one other reviewer I was (initially) underwhelmed by this episode, but by the end realised that in fact it's one of the best. The transition of Pete, as a character we are learning to loathe to one that draws on our sympathy; the unlikely chemistry between Lane and Joan; the emerging strength of Don's wife Megan (which reaches new heights in the next episode), and of course Pete's comeuppance. Like all good episodes the threads come together and become more meaningful by the end. This episode is a triumph for Weiner and Pierson (writers) and Slattery (director) who I've always admired in front of the camera and who now proves himself (again) behind it.

Yes, Pete and Trudy's dinner party scene seems a little slow and somehow empty. But it turns out that this was important as this episode is largely about Pete's unhappiness and his feelings of emptiness and inadequacy. He is desperately trying to be upbeat only to be upstaged by Don (...before he is ultimately knocked down by Lane!).

The old rivalry between Pete and Ken Cosgrove is also subtly reprised in the closing scene where the creativity of Ken's 'Beethoven 9' story contrasts sharply with Pete's emptiness. I've always liked the closing music in Mad Men, and this one - with it's almost overpowering irony (Ode to Joy) - is one of the best.

Great stuff!
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fountain (2006)
5/10
A bit pretentious, I'm afraid, and ultimately fails to convince.
22 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Some great photography here and some great effects too. But - despite some thought provoking scenes along the way (hence still 5 stars above) - overall I have to agree with the more cynical reviews on this site.

The film is undoubtedly pretentious and could so easily have been better. Having set out the time-shift connection between the Spanish conquistadors of Queen Isabela, and the contemporary / present scenes, plus the (potentially after-death and nirvana-like) future scenes, the film - both its premise and screenplay - completely fails to deliver.

I have no doubt that Darren Aronofsky had a pretty good original idea for a film here, but somewhere along the way the directness and simplicity of his story got lost. I suspect he, and the editors, where not quite sure how to end this film. The beginning of the film is a bit slow, and some patience is needed to stay with it. Unfortnately, dear film-goer, your patience is not rewarded with anything like a satisfactory outcome - this film needed an ending and didn't have one.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mad Men (2007–2015)
10/10
Art for art's sake
4 May 2009
Something about it ...this is not ordinary TV. In fact it provides a more cinematic experience than many 'cinema' films, with high production values, an emphasis on story line not cheap laughs or thrills, character development, and enigmatic red-herrings: all of which you would expect to find in a film but rarely get. This is simply an artistic work and questions about its political correctness, authenticity or message are redundant. Like all art it transcends such mundane considerations and is as enjoyable as a scrummy complex wine (and similarly addictive). If I have any criticism of it as a work of art I guess it does trade, to some extent, on a nostalgic view - or at least some kind of perceived connection with - both 'Americana' and with the period in which it is set, so in more ways than one: TV for grown-ups.
18 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Out of Time (I) (2003)
4/10
The Thomas Crowne Affair it ain't...
28 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Watchable twist and turns thriller which, along the way, contrasts the dynamics of real power with that which is implicit within male-female relationships (hence the reference to the Thomas Crowne Affair). In this film we have, intertwined with the plot, the juxtaposition of the hero's failed (but ultimately resurrected) marriage, with his adulterous and treacherous affair. The film's insurance scam (another echo of the Thomas Crowne Affair), and the police and drugs money antics, fall into second place against the drama and significance of these personal relationships.

Unfortunately the predictable and saccharine denouement of the resurrected marriage fails to convince - largely because the chemistry between the leading man (Denzel Washington) and his adulterous paramour (Sanaa Lathan) far outstrips that between him and his ex-wife (Eva Mendes).
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A match made in heaven?
13 April 2008
Good family film - something particularly wholesome about Kenneth More - and I don't want to 'rain on the parade' (More is one of my favourite actors and 1958 one of my favourite years - see also: A Night to Remember', More et al 1958). But there does seem to be a lack of chemistry between More (Jonathan Tibbs) and Jayne Mansfield (Kate) - notwithstanding that this is primarily a spoof-western comedy rather than a RomCom. Did they actually get on? Some of the scenes with just the two of them are painfully laboured. But, yes, the film (due in no small part to the laconic ease of More) is entirely watchable, and the production values - even for this lightweight film - are as high as you would expect from any mainstream Hollywood film of the day.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Circle (1957)
6/10
Very English Hitchcock wannabe.
30 November 2007
This interesting - if flawed - Hitchcock wannabe, unexpectedly delights in the period snapshots of London circa 1957/8. The embankment / London Zoo / 'London Airport', together with lots of cigarettes and social etiquette. Mills is accomplished in the role of the consultant/surgeon thrown into a game of 'cat and mouse', even if the dénouement is a little corny.

In addition to the cameos by Lionel Jeffries, and a relatively young Wilfred Hyde-White, Roland Culver cuts a familiar, yet enigmatic, figure as the all-seeing, all-knowing Inspector - far better than many similar roles in some Hitchcock thrillers.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed