Reviews written by registered user
|20 reviews in total|
This film was overlong, largely because there was not enough subject
matter to carry it along. The issues it did deal with it did so
superficially and with little new.
The option of homeschooling was an obvious theme which was largely ignored (although if it gives rise to pretentious prats I'd avoid it).
Issues of how to live a moral life in an immoral society was also available and ignored.
The landscapes were beautiful. The acting was satisfactory. However, the cast were all stereotypes and caricatures and none had any depth.
The story was implausible with enough holes to make it look as if an ice- pick had been at it. Where did they get money, how did the father train in quantum physics and the arts, how can all the children of various ages do the same physical feats, how did they mesh their carnivorous fun with Bhuddism, how did they deal with sexual awakening, where did all the shop bought clothes come from, the list is endless ? ? ?
This is an American progressives' fantasy of life in the woods, just don't expect any depth or content
There is no doubt of the visual imagination of the director. This is
clear and impressive but it is unfortunately not matched by similar
moral or narrative abilities.
There is a weak and meandering storyline which seems to twist and turn and random with no direction. It is obvious that there was a disaster with the casting and the story-line reflects this.
The film hints at serious themes : religion, choices and moral dilemmas but delivers none of these. But instead it serves up a mish-mash of visual icons : tarot cards, god and a rock & roll devil, eastern mysticism, a homage to Hitchcock, you name it, it is probably here.
It is like a large bow festooned box of chocolates, with bright colours, shiny papers, crinkly wrappers but lacking sweets.
I though that this film was well done. It is a long time since I went
to a horror movie, the recent change in the genre towards torture films
has kept me away. The reputation of the team making this film suggested
it was worth a shot.
It is excellent. Early on the tension starts to build and fairly early on the monsters are brought into view. The tentacles and the insects are well done scary creations.
However, as it progresses, it becomes cleverer. It develops its own 'Lord of the Flies' feel. Then the truly scary monsters start to appear - fear, loathing, paranoia and despair. By the end your nerves will have been shredded and when you thought it couldn't get worse.. it does
This is an excellent film and hopefully it will be widely seen. It
certainly deserves a large audience.
Not only is it well made. The direction is very good, the acting first class, and the script is very good at delivering hard moral questions in a realistic setting.
Throughout the film characters have to make difficult choices, often between an easy short-term option and a more hazardous and onerous long-term moral choice. The characters are consistent in how they approach these dilemmas and how they succeed or fail.
It is the kind of film that will make you think and will make you want to talk to others who have seen it. You'll want to know "what would you have done".
There is no doubt a lot of talent behind this film. There is good
acting, good direction and at times good dialogue. The script is worthy
and involves interesting themes of corruption, guilt and redemption.
The big names involved and the trailer will mean a large audience is
However, I feel it ultimately misses the mark. It is not its plodding slowness, nor is it the padding (which trying to be portentous becomes only pretentious), nor is it even the cold, grimy mire that envelopes everything. It is the failure to have any passion or any character that is worth a damn. All are damned from the start and we don't really care.
Although this is a fantasy it is a valuable film.
Slater gives an excellent performance of the schizoid loner on the edge and it it becomes possible to genuinely empathise with his lot. Rarely has a character so distorted and distopian managed to maintain some warmth.
The film work is stylish and stunning at times. Simple effects are used with great impact.
A comedy about catastrophe and despair, a romance about alienation, a hero who is past the point of breakdown, a hero who is the victim -- excellent
This was really quite an unpleasant film and one that it difficult to
recommend at any level.
The characters are very poorly constructed.The villains (or victims) have only enough detail to allow their subsequent destruction He is a child abuser, we can now do whatever depravity we wish. The heroes are unpleasant, egoistic hedonists who can only gain pleasure through suffering. The acting is stiff and stilted. No range of emotions are demonstrated and the acting is reduced to stereotyped visual clichés.
The plot is unbelievable. There is no need for the secret deserted pathology room when they work in a fully equipped department, the gore is unrealistic and the medical puzzles are unfeasible and pointless.
There is no redeeming feature to the film unless it is possibly to justify the film "Funny Games".
One is left feeling the need for a shower; dirty, guilty and disappointed. A film best to avoid.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This is a film to avoid.
It has no real redeeming features. Although it has an all-star cast each and every one fails to raise this film from the floor. There is much face pulling (instead of acting) and the script is very poor being devoid of any humour.
However, this might have been anticipated had they considered the story line - Girl wonders if a man had sex with her mother and grandmother. Wonders if he might be her father - discovers he probably isn't so has sex with him.
It was lucky this coupling was barren, as if she had given birth to a girl we could have had the even more tasteless joke - the man could have her too - four rather than only three generations, what a hoot !
Only recommended as an emetic.
This was simple dreadful. To take an excellent, thoughtful and
genuinely scary film and to create this hash from it is blasphemous.
Where it kept to the same lines as the original it was always outshone. On every level it was unable to generate the creepy suspenseful feel of the original. In the original one could believe Summerisle existed, it was on the surface normal, it was what was underneath that menaced. In this version, everything was unreal (and thus unthreatening) from the start.
Where the film deviated from the original it normally debased itself. The gratuitous violence and CGI did nothing to save it.
The acting was uniformly porcine but perhaps we were able to sense the guilt the actors had when they realised what they were doing
This was one of the best films I have seen for many years. The
photography is absolutely marvellous; it hardly needs anything else.
The acting is restrained, measured and true. I couldn't get much better than this.
It is true that it is emotionally laden but it is not all sadness, there is also humour, affection, and most importantly hope. If you find it too emotional you can always pretend that smoke got in your eyes.
Isn't the function of a good film to try and draw out emotions ? It is especially rewarding when these are positive and natural rather than base and specious.
An easy 10 out of 10
|Page 1 of 2:|| |