Reviews written by registered user
|120 reviews in total|
This was a really disappointing movie. It totally lacked the intricate
plot of the first one, substituting it with violent action galore. Not
only did the continuing fighting scenes get boring after some time, but
they were also relying on cheap shock effects adding nothing to the oh
so thin story. It's a shame that the makers did not have the courage to
add to the complicated storyline the first movie provided.
There were a whole bunch of question marks left after the film finally ended, but I did not care. One vampire could do this, the other vampire could do that, no consistency at all in what the races were able to perform - as long as the shock effect was guaranteed, any character could do just what came into the mind of the director.
If not for Kate Beckinsale looking great and getting out of her suit in one scene (hot!), this movie would not be worth watching at all. A real letdown after the really well done first movie.
When a divorced woman with three children meets the charming Werner
from Vienna, this is the beginning of the most popular family series in
Germanys TV history (at least in the last 30 years).
The show mixed new social realities (broken home families) with the old feel-good attitude of the 60s - resulting in a TV series which is timeless in spite of typical 80s furniture and clothes. You can still watch it, not only for nostalgia reasons, but because the new family system gives you the good feeling that every problem can be solved within 45 minutes - and you can be happy in a family even in troubled times like these.
A more than funny supporting cast provides for many laughs. Must see TV for German Generation Xers...
You can't blame a movie for being close to the original, can you?
Having read most of the Sin City comic books just recently, I sometimes
thought that some of the most disturbing portrayals of extreme violence
and bloodshed should have been left out in the movie. It is something
different if you have a black and white panel in a comic book or if you
have moving pictures which make the experience much more alive.
Still, apart from the blood and gore criticism, the film is a very exact rendition of what the comics are about. Harldy ever has any form of book been transferred to the big screen in such an unbiased form - certainly due to Frank Miller being the co-director of the movie.
The movie is fast-paced, the characters are strong and the visual adaption of the comic is breath taking. If you close your eyes during some of the most violent scenes, you have a perfect example of a comic book movie here.
Still, I thought that some of the elements left out in the Hardigan storyline were diminishing the personal drama the character is going through. Maybe it would have been better to show these elements - scenes in which Hardigan talks to his wife or is confronted with Senator Roark in court - and to leave out one or two severed limbs instead?
I really like Austrian humor. Many Austrian comedians display a certain
kind of self irony modern German comedians seem to be incapable of.
Georg Hader is one of the best Austrian comedians out there, and his
movies are unfortunately hardly famous in Germany, which is a real
Hader mixture of black humor, self irony and the wonderful accent provide splendid entertainment. in "Silentium", he targets the catholic church and the high society of the beautiful city of Salzburg.
While Salzburg is a beautiful panorama for this movie, the most important thing about this film are the characters, who - far from being heroes - try to solve a murder mystery with nothing else but courage and surprising integrity - considering they hardly manage to keep their own lives straight.
A wonderful example of Austrian comedy. Highly recommendable!
I've seen Reservoir Dogs, Jackie Brown and Pulp Fiction. There was a
lot of blood and gore in these movies, but they had a story - something
"Kill Bill" is totally lacking.
I was rather appalled to see this movie so many people are mad about - and to see that it's nothing else but a meaningless bunch of fight scenes, full of blood and bad taste.
Has Tarantino finally lost his mind? Violence for the sake of violence? No plot whatsoever? Fight scenes ten minutes long that make Matrix 2 look like Citizen Kane? What has happened that our society embraces a movie like this which has nothing to show but blood and chopped of arms and feet?
There is a movie in which the (possible) dramatic consequences of Global
Warming are displayed.
The message is simple: If we, and that is especially the U.S., keep on destroying our environment, there is the terrible danger that someday, nature will strike back.
In Emmerichs movie, this "strike" is a new Ice Age.
End of message, end of movie.
But: All people here seem to be caring about is how dull the plot was and how insolent it is to bother Americans with such a topic after 9/11.
I really feel for the victims of this tragedy, but the essence of the movie is lost is these complaints. Because if some kind of weather crisis would actually someday be happening, it would be far worse than a hundred 9/11s together.
It is always simple to escape into dream worlds - but the truth remains out there, and it is not about a quarrel between Liberals and Republicans, but about our future. Let's hope Emmerichs vision will never come true. But don't look away from the reality of pollution, wasting our natural resources and Global Warming. That would be an insult to your intelligence...
So what's so special about this flick?
Two people meet far away from home and do some exploring of japanese culture. The movie drags on and on and on, it's neither boring nor exciting - it just is. One thing the movie certainly is NOT is thought-provoking. I would go as far as saying that I had forgotten it already the moment I left the theater - yes, I thought a lot more about "X-Men 2" than I did about "Lost in translation"...
Could not make out the splendid direction, could not make out the wonderful screenplay... all I could detect were two excellent actors doing their best while doing nothing special at all.
I saw the original Time Machine movie last when I was a boy, so I hardly
remembered the original story which probably was the better way to watch
Unfortunately somehow the subtitles went awry so I did not get all the subtle elements of the story. Still, I thought the movie was entertaining and some moments were rather breathtaking, especially the time travel scenes themselves - seeing the Ice Age crushing in was really a thrill.
The end of the movie seems hasty and somehow leaves a big question mark. Well, most time travel movies do - but this one does so a little bit more because it ends so suddenly and to be true, the main question asked by the Guy Pearce character is answered - but I did not get it because of Jeremy Irons' mumbling...
...for Gods sake it's over.
I really was never a big Matrix fan from the beginning. The first movie was kind of cool, but the story was by far not that new - to be honest, reality not being reality has been a well known Science Fiction concept for over 50 years.
But there had to be a sequel - big money was waiting. So no matter how thin the story was in the first installment of this series - the Wachowski Brothers succeeded in providing even less story and putting together a movie which consists of two main "devices":
- Endless (and after a while incredibly boring) Kung Fu fighting scenes
- Tons of utterly meaningless monologues by nearly every character but Neo.
While the action sequences in spite of their seeming endlessness sometimes had an entertaining element in them, the monologues really made me (and many viewers around me as I could hear) yawning. I still can hardly believe what a huge amount of total gibberish the Wachowskis expect us to swallow in Matrix: Reloaded. It seemed that every time they did not know how to explain what was going on, they chose to say: "It's destiny". But when you sit in a movie theatre and have to listen to ridiculous characters from Jacques Chirac to Sigmund Freud talking about nothing but destiny - then that particular story device is certainly overused... and the Rocky Horror Picture Show comes to mind: "Booooooring!"
All in all I was very disappointed and totally unnerved. Do I believe in destiny? Well, I believe in entertainment, and this movie certainly is not entertaining - at all!
... too little plot.
I have read the Daredevil comics for years and I know there is more about the story than Daredevil fighting Bulleye, Bullseye fighting Elektra, Elektra fighting Daredevil, Daredevil fighting Kingpin...
The characters were barely introduced before they were thrown into a fight. The action was a little bit too quick for my eyes, the costumes were a little too sado maso for me. The director tried to imitate the Tim Burton Batman atmosphere and was successful - but only to the extent that many scenes were pretty dark, so dark you could only guess what was happening.
So what remains? A decent action movie which is quite brutal at times, still worth watching if you like Superhero movies. But nothing compared to X-Men and Spiderman. A pity.
|Page 1 of 12:||          |