A Girl Named Jo (2018– ) User Reviews

Oof

[lozziehargreaves · 6/10 · 6 December 2019]

I really only added this review because it somehow had an 8.6 but it's really not a great show. I get that brat isn't a very high budget production company, but truly the only thing they did to make it set in the 60s is the clothing. You can very easily see cars that are not from the 60s driving in the background and they make no attempt to edit them out. Also, though I know they are only young, the acting really is not good

Love this series!

[rmporchids · 10/10 · 18 January 2020]

Watched all the episodes way to quick and can't wait for further seasons to air. Great interesting story line peeking in to how life was in the past.

Like Riverdale but better

[jbricker-02004 · 10/10 · 21 January 2021]

It a kid friendly version of Riverdale that take place in the 1960 and the acting is really good and the story will keep you invested

Good enough, for its platform.

[camidolphin-93494 · 4/10 · 21 September 2020]

Better than Chicken Girls (which has no plot, bad acting, and also... chicken girls? really?), but still just mediocre. For Brat standards, though, I'd say this is one of the better shows- though I wish they'd start casting more actors and less YouTubers.

9/10!

[cldew-11788 · 10/10 · 5 July 2018]

I personally love this series because the story is connected to the other stories such as the chicken girls, and i like how it also have a flashback on attaway's past. Overall, this tv show is amazing. I love it!

Bad

[punitha_baliah · 1/10 · 19 April 2020]

The whole show is bad. It sets in the 60s, but noting in the movies makes it from the 60s. The acting is cringe. There are some mediocre actors, but that Annie girl always had to have the spotlight, she drags the whole show down.

Who is rating this highly?

[suzannewertman · 2/10 · 3 February 2020]

Horrible writing, horrible acting... I couldn't get past 10 minutes of the first episode. Terrible.