Horrible 'documentary'.... Penny Junor seems to be very biased... as are others in this cheap 'documentary'. Diana should have been stronger and less sensitive and not expect a romantic idea of a husband who would support her and love her, is the shared view of these people, who are verbally creating this Image of Diana Spencer. 'If she would have had a stronger personality, she would have survived'. Someone else says about the 19 year old Diana, that she was charmed by the idea of becoming Queen and thus that was the main reason for her to get into this marriage. In stead of the very plausible idea that a 19 year old (she was a virgin) was smitten by this handsome Charles figure. Junor easily says she has a damaged background. Charles also of course has a damaged background, but Penny Junor then avoids calling this a damaged background. No, he has 'lack of confidence', she says. Furthermore Penny J is emphasising that as a child Diana was never sticking at anything... she repeats these words a couple of times: never sticking at anything. As if Diana was feeble, not focused and again 'weak'. Normal people would say Diana, as a child, was looking for things that would fit her. And that it is very healthy for her to not continue doing things if these things don't fit her personality. Also is emphasised that Diana wasn't very well educated. Well, neither is the Queen and neither are most of the royals. And neither are the majority of the British people! And Charles isn't either a brainy physicist, mathematician or heart surgeon. He's one of the few Windsors that went to university, but come on: he studied history and cultural anthropology. Everyone can get a Master's degree in these subjects. So, no this is cringy to watch. It is a total defamation of character.