To measure something one needs a yardstick against which to calibrate or stack up the entity at hand. So I like to watch, once in a while, gonzo porn crap to compare with the ongoing quality material I'm immersing myself in.
So this random junker I received as a freebie (in a package containing specifically ordered DVDs) served a purpose. Its shortcomings are obvious next to similar but quality content.
Title honestly represents the package of older/younger lesbian trysts, by far the most popular segment of the Sapphic porn industry. But the folks at the L Factor label don't have a clue how to make a movie, let alone an interesting porn video.
Four vignettes have something in common: poor production values and limited technique. Uncredited pornographers have fallen back on the 1-camera, real time (with limited editing) technique which inevitably results in boredom. Recall that even Hitchcok's elaborate experiment "Rope" in a similar vein was a failure.
The sets are ludicrous -not even of the sort that might pass muster in an Elementary School play. My candidate for worst in show has to be a masseuse session with a masseuse table sitting near a brick wall and a couple of hanging wall cloths standing in for who knows what, certainly not a massage parlor. This holds true for all 4 scenes.
The masseuse in question is Samantha St. James, abusing young Jackie Avalon. Both are unattractive and overweight, with Jackie a one-shot performer and St. James really a turn-off: I assumed she was a hooker, and IMDb more politely identifies her as "an adult escort and dominatrix".
Several other losers pop up, notably little Veronica Jett and old Kayla Quinn who have amassed innumerable gonzo or fetish credits for no particular reason. Superstar Nina Hartley is quite tiresome doing her standard "instructional" routine for Izabella Star (another one-shot).
Acting in XXX hits a new low in a dean/school applicant faceoff that is acted and directed as if it were an off-off-Broadway 1-act play, but with anti-talented actresses. The culprits are Quinn and usually okay Amber Rayne.
Overall quality is as low (or worse) than those horrible four or five hour compilations flooding the bottom end of the market.
So this random junker I received as a freebie (in a package containing specifically ordered DVDs) served a purpose. Its shortcomings are obvious next to similar but quality content.
Title honestly represents the package of older/younger lesbian trysts, by far the most popular segment of the Sapphic porn industry. But the folks at the L Factor label don't have a clue how to make a movie, let alone an interesting porn video.
Four vignettes have something in common: poor production values and limited technique. Uncredited pornographers have fallen back on the 1-camera, real time (with limited editing) technique which inevitably results in boredom. Recall that even Hitchcok's elaborate experiment "Rope" in a similar vein was a failure.
The sets are ludicrous -not even of the sort that might pass muster in an Elementary School play. My candidate for worst in show has to be a masseuse session with a masseuse table sitting near a brick wall and a couple of hanging wall cloths standing in for who knows what, certainly not a massage parlor. This holds true for all 4 scenes.
The masseuse in question is Samantha St. James, abusing young Jackie Avalon. Both are unattractive and overweight, with Jackie a one-shot performer and St. James really a turn-off: I assumed she was a hooker, and IMDb more politely identifies her as "an adult escort and dominatrix".
Several other losers pop up, notably little Veronica Jett and old Kayla Quinn who have amassed innumerable gonzo or fetish credits for no particular reason. Superstar Nina Hartley is quite tiresome doing her standard "instructional" routine for Izabella Star (another one-shot).
Acting in XXX hits a new low in a dean/school applicant faceoff that is acted and directed as if it were an off-off-Broadway 1-act play, but with anti-talented actresses. The culprits are Quinn and usually okay Amber Rayne.
Overall quality is as low (or worse) than those horrible four or five hour compilations flooding the bottom end of the market.