Killer Camera Monsters (2020) User Reviews

I kinda liked it

[jonigail · 4/10 · 14 September 2020]

Not so bad like others were saying depending on if it's what you're looking for.

This was just ludicrous...

[paul_haakonsen · 2/10 · 23 April 2020]

Granted, I hadn't even heard about this 2020 movie titled "Killer Camera Monsters", but I was given the chance to watch it, and I did take the chance. I believed the movie to be a horror movie, given the title of the movie and the movie's poster/cover.

Turns out that this was definitely within the horror genre, but I wouldn't exactly claim to call it an effective horror movie. Not even by a long shot. This movie was effectively as pointless as it was mundane and boring.

I mean, the whole concept of a camera being capable of turning people into monsters if their photo is shot in artificial lighting. Wait... What? Seriously? Yeah. That was essentially it. And it wasn't even interesting monsters, it was just the people layered with questionable halloween make-up - not even latex maskes or prosthetics - just ordinary make-up, and making grotesque sounds that no human throat can produce. Yeah, that qualified as monsters according to writer and director Ryan McBay.

I wasn't the least bit entertained or impressed by what I saw here, but I have to be honest and say that I suffered through the movie to the bitter end. Hoping that something worthwhile would happen. It never did. Unless you count the end credits as being worthwhile.

My rating of "Killer Camera Monsters" is a mere two out of ten stars. Some of us suffered through this ordeal so you don't have to. There really is no need to go out wasting your time, money or effort on "Killer Camera Monsters", unless you maybe know someone whom was in the movie.

Open the trunk

[nogodnomasters · 2/10 · 20 January 2020]

Adam Jones (Philip Orazio) a down on his luck photography buys a camera out of the trunk of a car. He was told to only take photos of people in natural light, the first and only rule that he breaks. People who are shot with the camera turn into low budget monsters. Rash of killings, investigation, etc.

This was designed to be a comedy judging from the goofy private investigator. Neither the comedy nor the horror worked.

Guide: F-word. Sex. No nudity.

Top amateur effort

[staunton-gary · 5/10 · 11 January 2020]

Ryan McBay has skills, that need work to produce a polished movie. I enjoyed this movie and found myself giggling in some parts due to the comedic efforts. Although this movie definitely comes across as an amateurish production, it is certainly better than some of the other offerings out there. I hope that McBay expands on his writing and directing skills, I am sure there is a talent there. The story itself was done well, general production was overall good. Were there issues, yes, but let them slide and you might just enjoy this.

The Room level amateur but you can't even laugh at it.

[tanyatzatmary · 1/10 · 20 July 2020]

It feels like a bad adult film, but never gets to the adult part. I truly feel like I wasted my time for the first time ever watching a movie. I've seen bad, but this is a whole new level of bad. Possibly the worst movie ever made.

If Mollasses Can Kill

[arfdawg-1 · 1/10 · 16 January 2020]

Slowest movie ever made. Everyone has a pseudo-Russian accent which makes me wonder where the financing came from.

This plot is simple and needs no explanation -- just read the film's title.

The problem with this movie -- besides the horrible script, poor direction and lack of suitable acting skills is that it is slower than molasses. If the camera doesnt kill you, the pace will.

bad movie, bad actors, very low budget

[jcroak-18174 · 1/10 · 31 January 2021]

I had to turn it off as soon as the PI showed. talk about overacting, he was horrible. I cannot describe just how bad this movie, weel the 20 minutes that I watched, Take heed, don't bother

EEK!

[jgiecek · 2/10 · 4 March 2020]

This movie is just that, EEK!! I wish I could say that was for the horror but, the lights, camera work, script, actors, etc. etc. make it more like, OH GAWD THIS IS BAD!!! 2 stars for a dark glimpse of Olive (the assistant) rear early on in the movie.

The worst

[littlezhidao · 1/10 · 25 January 2020]

Wow, literally the worst ! I wish I can give 0 star

This Movie could have been something real good if only

[orinmichaelorlandoorio · 1/10 · 7 February 2020]

The acting is terrible to the point i laugh. I never seen a movie with such bad actors. The script did not help and it felt like the zombie thing was just added for kicks. How can the writer actors watch this and think that was a great movie and be proud. The ending is even worse . The start of the movie had promise as it seem that it would be a guy who bought a camera that brought out the darkness in him. It drove him to kill. That would have been a much better plot. Or the camera took peoples souls and they just died and not turn into anything. That way the photographer would have the last ever picture of that person alive. That would have made much much better sense, But nope lets go the zombie root. The guy who plays Adam as been acting since he was 13. hahahaha. Even writing that I am laughing. Phillip Orazio if i was you i would give it up. The supporting act was even worse. How this film even got release will always be a question that will never be answered

What The......

[wandernn1-81-683274 · 1/10 · 17 January 2021]

Poor Adam has a photography problem. He fails to heed a warning about his camera is not supposed to be used under any artificial light. He soon figures out that he has the ability to create killer man eating monsters just by taking pictures of them.

This unfolds into a terribly badly acted , horribly written, umm.....movie?? Is that what this is? Anyway, whatever resulted, it's terrible.

And Nope, I couldn't stand it. Turned it off with 24 minutes left. Horrible.

...bad enough to be good enuf?

[zooshmill-99104 · 1/10 · 14 March 2021]

... almost, but it took itself too seriously. Downfall. Had they melted it down into a smelly little swirl of pure absurdity, sprinkled with smatterings of downright goofiness, then it might have stood a better chance. The acting was bad enough that it could have worked. While the premise offered a broad field to plow, it could have been made delightfully campy, wonderfully stupid and pleasantly preposterous - no doubt it would have been more fun to experience, and had much broader appeal. As it stands - a tad boring.