No spoilers here, but disappointment that a good underlying plot is left unfulfilled by flaws. Mainly in the writing that puts pathologists in places where they should not - and would not normally - be. This is a long-standing flaw in the writing. There is an admitted close working relationship between forensic pathologists and law enforcement, but there are limits that the writers see as one-way. Do we ever see a cop in the dissection theater? No, and for good reason. But we frequently see pathologists at crime scenes - as they are happening - when this is unbelievable and unlikely in true police work. The writers cannot seem to tell a story about the behind the scenes pathology work without 1) involving a pathologist personally or romantically, or 2) putting an eager pathologist in the thick of police action so the cameras can capture their horror or disbelief at what's happening. Another tiresome plot device is the rookie, or disbelieving, or bent copper needing to be convinced of the true worth of science in the solution of crime mysteries. And lastly - not so evident here but frequently displayed in other episodes - is the interrogation room where police badger the suspect with all manner of leading, biased, unfounded fabrications and suppositions, hoping to break the will of the detainee. Geez, give it up!