Pawnography (TV Series 2014– ) Poster

(2014– )

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
show lacks and gives sneaky barter edge to Rick...
rfoker1 August 2014
Show is lacking and seems simplistic. The host is rather annoying and he gives Rick an edge on bartering at the end.

EVERY time a contestant finishes answering the 60sec quiz, the host asks; "how do you think you did", BUT, he asks this as Rick, Corey and Chumlee are already walking out with their headphones off. This clearly gives Rick a bartering advantage because Rick can hear how the contestants think they did on the quiz. I do not like this and it is very sneaky! I noticed this the first episode and it has remained the same for the other one's. Not sure if Rick can actually hear the contestants response, but it's sneaky none the less.

And it seems Rick dropped the surprised look after the the 1st round of episodes regarding the show pulling items from his store. There's NO WAY they are taking stuff without his permission. It's completely staged.

I dislike the host. He's tacky, goofy and annoying.

I have watched every episode of Pawn Stars show and I still enjoy that show.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Pawnography Essentially Ben Stein's Money with an Insufferable Host: Should be Called "Win Rick Harrison's Stuff"
classicalsteve31 July 2014
In the late 1990's to early 2000's, Comedy Central broadcast a game show called "Win Ben Stein's Money". Ben Stein was a rather obnoxious and opinionated right-winger who produced and co-hosted the show with Jimmy Kimmel who now has his own late-night show on ABC. "Pawnography", a spin-off show from History's "Pawn Stars" is essentially the same format as "Win Ben Stein's Money". Instead the prize isn't money but collectible "stuff". And the host is a bit different, but we'll get to that.

The premise of Ben Stein's original show was simple enough. Stein would put $5000 in the "bank", and the first round consisted of three contestants answering Jeopardy-like questions in "funny categories" with dollar values which would extract money from "the bank". Contestants won money which was always being propagated as being Stein's, even though it was really the money of the show. (Stein made millions from the show, so whatever money was supposedly lost during his show were negligible overall.) After the first round, the last place contestant (the one with the least amount of dough) had to leave, his or her money would return to the bank, and Ben Stein would become the third participant. Although Stein couldn't actually win, he could prevent the other contestants from obtaining "his money" by answering correct questions.

In the final round, the contestant with the most "cash" had to beat Stein directly by going head-to-head with the host/producer in order to win an additional $5000. Stein and the contestant each try and answer correctly as many of 10 questions as possible in 60 seconds. The higher number of right answers was the winner. Each contestant would be in a booth. The contestant's booth looked like a one-room brown-stone while Stein's booth looked like the sitting room of a posh château. If the contestant beat Stein, he would win an extra $5000. If not, the contestant would receive the money he had won during the other rounds plus maybe "Win Ben Stein's Money" the board game. During each airing Stein would repeatedly say things like "These contestants are trying to take MY money!"

Now fast-forward 10 years. With the success of "Pawn Stars", the History Channel has decided to resurrect "Win Ben Stein's Money" with a bit of a twist. Instead of cash, contestants are trying to win collectibles at the Pawn Shop. Each round has up for grabs a collectible item plus the virtual "cash" earnings won by answering correct questions. The first round involves two contestants, and Corey and Chumlee acting as a third contestant. In the second round, Rick Harrison becomes the third contestant. They answer similar questions as in "Stein's Money" but there are no set categories. If the Pawn Stars team ever wins the round, the item up for grabs is lost. If a contestant wins the round, they "sort of" win the item, but not entirely. After the second round, the contestant with the highest "cash" winnings must play all three Pawn Stars in the same head-to-head as "Stein's Money". Another item is now up for grabs, but the contestant must beat the Pawn Stars to win the other item(s) of the other rounds, plus the cash. (If the Pawn Star contestants came out ahead in the previous rounds, only the item of the 3rd round can be won plus the cash.) If the contestant loses the head-to-head round, he or she wins nothing. However there is one final "round" after the questions. Before revealing how the outcome of the head-to-head round, the contestant and Rick Harrison can negotiate for a money "deal" in lieu of the contestant taking away the cash and the prize(s).

In the original show, Ben Stein was a somewhat over-bearing conservative who, strangely, had charm, personality, and a good sense of humor. Despite his politics might drive liberals into setting fire to effigies of Barry Goldwater, Stein had enough of a spark in his eye to make the show at least modestly entertaining. And you always laughed when he griped about losing "his money". And contestants at least kept the money they won during the other rounds.

However, in "Pawnography" the contestant gains no prizes unless they beat the Pawn Stars in the last round, which I think is a total sham. And, Christopher Titus, the current host of "Pawnography", is an over-bearing humorless and down-right insufferable jerk. He has the dis-respectfulness of a John McEnroe and the crassness of a Howard Stern, cubed. Titus has the kind of personality which makes King Kong look like an honorable gentleman. His cutting little comments are about as funny as Joseph McCarthy during his hearings in the Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security in the early 1950's. Whether Titus is liberal or conservative, I don't care. I might have rated the show about a 7, but with Titus, it rates 3 points lower. Only Titus could make Stein seem like a courteous gentleman. Maybe the reason they got Titus is he makes the other Pawn Stars, Harrison, Corey and Chumlee, seem much more socially courteous and respectful. As long as Titus is hosting, I probably won't be able to suffer the insufferable.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Couldn't have said it better! Chris Titus ruins it....
abbymichel964 October 2014
AMEN!!

Christopher Titus, the current host of "Pawnography", is an over-bearing humorless and down-right insufferable jerk. He has the dis-respectfulness of a John McEnroe and the crassness of a Howard Stern, cubed. Titus has the kind of personality which makes King Kong look like an honorable gentleman. His cutting little comments are about as funny as Joseph McCarthy during his hearings in the Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security in the early 1950's. Whether Titus is liberal or conservative, I don't care. I might have rated the show about a 7, but with Titus, it rates 3 points lower. Only Titus could make Stein seem like a courteous gentleman. Maybe the reason they got Titus is he makes the other Pawn Stars, Harrison, Corey and Chumlee, seem much more socially courteous and respectful. As long as Titus is hosting, I probably won't be able to suffer the insufferable.

Pawnography Essentially Ben Stein's Money with an Insufferable Host: Should be Called "Win Rick Harrison's Stuff" Author: classical Steve from Oakland, CA 31 July 2014
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"Win Ben Stein's Money" minus the charm and humor.
swiftandrewm5 February 2015
BEYOND Dreadful

An interesting idea for a show that is rendered unwatchable by the obnoxiousness of the cast. I also question whether the show is 100% on the up and up.

Christopher Titus, host, is simply annoying. He is obnoxious, overbearing and NOT funny, as far as I can tell the only people who laugh at his 'jokes' are the people on camera (and I suspect there's a flashing "LAUGH" sign right above the lens on the cameras).

Rick Harrison, who is quite likable on Pawn Stars, comes off as an insufferable bore on this show. Not content with answering questions he often feels the need to offer details (not all of which are accurate), which raises questions about the integrity of the game.

When was the last time you saw a contestant of a game show answer a question successfully and THEN go on to provide further details than provided by the host?

He comes off like an arrogant Cliff Clavin.

Of course this could have something to do with the fact that the questions are all geared to Rick's interests (he IS a smart guy).

Definitely worth missing.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How low can they go?
alydar2113 July 2014
Are you kidding me? Do these guys need to suck every penny they can from their fame before petering out? We all know that you are multi - millionaires already. Viewers have followed your family through several successful seasons and enjoyed the various parade of 'experts' brought in to enhance our interest in your field of endeavor.

Always thought Corey was the worst and most disrespectful member of this cast, but his dad Rick, comes across as a sincere lowlife when he raises his arms after answering a question correctly.

My respect for this family has dropped to zero after watching this atrocious drivel. Thank goodness the 'old man' didn't participate.

If this was the only show on TV, I would check myself into Hospice and beg for a quick end.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sadly, No Sale Here
glynne4122 July 2014
I've enjoyed Pawn Stars over the years, though the last two seasons have been less interesting, as the jokes are redundant and it gets tiring watching the same infighting, as humorous as they attempt to make it. The original beauty of the program was to watch what happened between the customers and the staff, not listen to the family and Chumlee constantly berating each other. It isn't funny any more.

So it is, this new show is not funny either. It's a very complicated game, and most of the prizes are so odd that no one would want them any way. But the worst part is that it just isn't interesting. It's like watching a group of bored people playing a game that even they don't like.

How about getting back to basics? Give the old show a much needed new direction. Forget the new show. How about acknowledging the new and healthy weight losses that some cast members are achieving? How about a little background on how they have all gotten to where they are today? How about giving other staff members some exposure. The show needs a deep infusion of new ideas. Obviously, these are great business people who have achieved a lot in their lives. They cannot be as boring as this show makes them appear. Change direction before your audience drops off to much less than these talented people deserve. Please! I actually like these people. I know they deserve better.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Complex Trivia Game Show About History and Collectibles
atlasmb14 July 2014
Two one-half hour episodes of "Pawnography" have aired on the History Channel so far. It is one of the most complex game shows ever to air. This is how it works: In Round One, two contestants face Corey and Chumlee (from the show "Pawn Stars") in answering multiple-choice trivia questions worth $100 each. They also play for a item from the "personal collection" of Rick Harrison, star of "Pawn Stars". (Actually, they don't win these items or dollars, they bank them, hoping to win them later.) Some questions may be related to the item they are battling for. If a contestant wins this round, he banks the collectible item. If the "Pawn Stars" duo wins this round, the item goes back to Rick.

In between Rounds One and Two, the two contestants get a shot to bank $150 by correctly answering a multiple-choice trivia question.

In Round Two, the contestants square off against Rick for $200 per question and a shot at another collectible item. At the end of this round, the contestant with the lower score is dismissed.

The remaining contestant faces all three Pawn Stars for all the cash he has banked plus the collectibles he has banked plus another collectible item. One item they played for was an early pinball game valued at $7,000.

In Round Three, the three Pawn Stars wait in a soundproof booth while the contestant tries to answer ten questions in 60 seconds. Viewers can see how many are answered correctly, but the contestant is not told. Then Rick and his two minions try to answer the same questions while the contestant is in the booth.

Before the players are told how they scored, the host (Christopher Titus) lets them negotiate with each other. Rick, based upon how well he thinks he did and how well he thinks the contestant did, offers the contestant a dollar amount to walk away from the banked items. I should mention that Rick is a formidable opponent when it comes to trivia, especially when it relates to history or collectibles. He is not Mark Labbett ("The Beast" on the gameshow "The Chase"), but he should not be underestimated. If he feels he outscored the contestant, he will offer a small amount. The contestant will, like all negotiators, try to bluff and ask for amounts closer to what the collectible items are actually worth. If an agreed price is negotiated, that is the amount the contestant wins. If an agreed price is not negotiated, the actual scores for Round Three are revealed and winner takes all. (Yes, the contestant may walk away without any winnings.) If there is a tie, the contestant prevails.

As you can see, this is a traditional trivia game show mixed with an element of negotiation--a staple on the "Pawn Stars" show. The show is punctuated with humor from the host and from the Pawn Stars, usually in the form of zingers.

If you like trivia or the personalities of the Pawn Stars guys, you may like this show. You might also learn some history or pick up some knowledge about collectibles.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
enough already
haroldhecuba24 May 2020
As if their obnoxious lowballing antics aren't enough on one show,rick has become so far king unbearable & clueless coreys not far behind.It's obviously rigged so the scabby mutton heads win.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
they'd rob beggers cups
cantstandya1317 June 2020
These guys are so incredibly scabby & unlikable this show just rubs the salt in,p rick & big loss are so boorish & pighheaded,then there's chum I'd suggest he's had a lobotomy but there's a certain organ necessary to start with.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
History buffs beware...
nitz_041 August 2014
I consider myself a clever fellow. I have studied history for over 10 years. And it is sad that when I watch this show it means jack squat.

The rules are straight forward. The questions are simple but complex.

If you were ever a fan of Titus? This show is up your alley. The host is quick witted and he knows his stuff too. There was a few references to his break through performance "Norman Rockwell is bleeding" but it was very subtle in the questions of a few episodes.

Rick, Corey, Chumlee work well in this scenario. Also it's fun seeing Rick's face when they are losing. Some of the items have more sentimental value than cash value and too me that makes this show interesting.

If you like history? Artifacts? Fun questions? This show is for you.

Great to see diversity from the History Channel.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hard to watch but hilarious.
dsendgraff076 November 2014
This show mocks the stupidity of the American public. It's a comedy show with Rick Harrison and gang keeping their reputation on unfair terms. The ironic genius of the show lies in the fact that the headphones aren't a means to silence but, to pass information. Will the Pawnstars ever go first in the final stage? It's also fun to realize what you know based on the absurdity of the question and what you truly know; throwing the 25% possibility aside. Can you walk home with a civil war musket in your shorts? The host is hilarious and is promoting a product Corey definitely isn't sold on because he feels as if it's humbling his father and therefore tarnishing a brand. This is a new perspective on someone selling their soul for money. Well done. Corey go to law school.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed